Stargate Mafia end game...french people are evil..

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:43 am

Time to do a summary of the Cena thing

Original thought that started the case:

ga7 wrote:
cena-rules wrote:vote nag

for 4 reasons

1) being a jerk
2) reacting badly to people trying ohter approaches (hiding domething
3) for having diddle compare himself to you
4) he should always die night 1

ok 2 is the oinly real reason but whatever.
Seeing as I just read the whole thing, I now find your reason particularly bogus: it wasn't about people trying other approaches at all. It looks to me that your mind was decided already on the vote and you just 'filled in the blank' with something that sounded credible. So far this is the scummiest thing in my eyes, so while it's not much, it deserves an Unvote Vote Cena

cena-rules wrote:SEEMS FAIR. Yeah I was always going to vote nag coz in my eyes he was the scummiest on day 1 other than the noobs but they dont know better

So here Cena admits it was bogus, but then when people question him further he backtracks:

cena-rules (talking about Nag) wrote:I meant that when Clive tried to do something he had a go at clive.

Thats it really

But that's bogus too...
First he gives "BS that looks like a good reason" with his vote, then basically admits he was trying to fool people, then acts like it made perfect sense.
All in all I'm not sure where this will lead us but since Cena & Clive seem a bit linked in their behavior (could be a coincidence but still), I think we might hit gold. Though I'm a bit worried that this seems like the only half-decent case we have today, the day practically passed with very few discussions, thus restricting our options... That ain't good

Roger Dodger · Post by **Roger Dodger** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:17 am

maybe Cena is an antagonizer??

VOTE= CENA

sorry buddy.

spurgistan · Post by **spurgistan** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:08 am

Unvote: Vote Clive Somehow, I get bad vibes from you. I don't want to lynch cena today.

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:12 am

ga7 wrote:Time to do a summary of the Cena thing
Original thought that started the case:
ga7 wrote:
cena-rules wrote:vote nag

for 4 reasons

1) being a jerk
2) reacting badly to people trying ohter approaches (hiding domething
3) for having diddle compare himself to you
4) he should always die night 1

ok 2 is the oinly real reason but whatever.
Seeing as I just read the whole thing, I now find your reason particularly bogus: it wasn't about people trying other approaches at all. It looks to me that your mind was decided already on the vote and you just 'filled in the blank' with something that sounded credible. So far this is the scummiest thing in my eyes, so while it's not much, it deserves an Unvote Vote Cena

cena-rules wrote:SEEMS FAIR. Yeah I was always going to vote nag coz in my eyes he was the scummiest on day 1 other than the noobs but they dont know better
So here Cena admits it was bogus, but then when people question him further he backtracks:
cena-rules (talking about Nag) wrote:I meant that when Clive tried to do something he had a go at clive.

Thats it really
But that's bogus too...
First he gives "BS that looks like a good reason" with his vote, then basically admits he was trying to fool people, then acts like it made perfect sense.
All in all I'm not sure where this will lead us but since Cena & Clive seem a bit linked in their behavior (could be a coincidence but still), I think we might hit gold. Though I'm a bit worried that this seems like the only half-decent case we have today, the day practically passed with very few discussions, thus restricting our options... That ain't good

This has gotta be the first case anybody has put togther in a CC mafia in a long time. Unfortunately, I highly doubt we'll get a reasonable defence from Cena, but what the hell, unvote vote Cena

firth4eva · Post by **firth4eva** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:16 am

meh unvote vote cena

lord voldemort · Post by **lord voldemort** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:20 am

yay a vc!!

nag (2) cena, clive
French (4) minister masket, skoffin, kwan
cena ( 8 ) - french, illy, lsu, crab, spiesr, firth, rd, diddle
clive (2) - nag, spurg
LSU (1) Leaibame
MM10 (2) Neut, shady
M.M (1) firc

15 to lynch

deadline will actually be 19 hours from this post cause i have baseball tomorrow

Roger Dodger · Post by **Roger Dodger** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:22 am

unvote vote cena

okay then, who could possibly be the real bad guy. Clive? Nag? MM?

now i have to make an effort & think.

and, what's the scoop with frenchie?

kwanton · Post by **kwanton** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:49 am

unvote
vote cena

cena-rules · Post by **cena-rules** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:33 pm

l-5. I dont claim til l-4 ever

muy_thaiguy · Post by **muy_thaiguy** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:42 pm

vote cena

cena-rules · Post by **cena-rules** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:44 pm

I am Colonel Sam Carter (jack of all trades)

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:52 pm

cena-rules wrote:I am Colonel Sam Carter (jack of all trades)

I'm guessing you haven't yet used an ability, as you'd probably use that to back up your claim.

cena-rules · Post by **cena-rules** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:53 pm

oh I did . Thought I put that in

meh investigated rebel. Hes town

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:53 pm

Hmm ok. Could anyone enlighten me and the poor folks who don't know shit about Stargate whether this char claim sounds legit?

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:55 pm

ga7 wrote:Hmm ok. Could anyone enlighten me and the poor folks who don't know shit about Stargate whether this char claim sounds legit?

Yeah, pretty legit, he's an important character, so JOAT would be a good role.

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:01 pm

Alright then, I'll buy it. Good thing you used your investigation night 1, I always see JOATs dying before they could tell anything useful.
Unvote
Any idea to avoid no lynch?

muy_thaiguy · Post by **muy_thaiguy** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:02 pm

*sigh*, now I'm starting to wish I had seen at least some of the series. Unvote.

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:06 pm

My vote stays until Cena makes another post.

CrabNebula · Post by **CrabNebula** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:25 pm

unvote before I go to sleep...

cena-rules · Post by **cena-rules** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:30 pm

diddle wrote:My vote stays until Cena makes another post.

to say what?

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:48 pm

cena-rules wrote:
diddle wrote:My vote stays until Cena makes another post.
to say what?

Do you notice anything about this?

diddle wrote:Yeah, pretty legit, he's an important character, so JOAT would be a good role.

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:49 pm

MEh, I semi-believe Cena's claim. While I know nothing about Stargate, I do know some things. First of all that JoaT is a terrible role. I'd never EVER EVER EVER!!!! put a main character as a JoaT. I would only use that terrible role as a filler role if I'm that stuck. (Note to all people in my future games) Anyway, that's why I disbelieve about Cena's claim, and I don't think LV was here for the stupid JoaT fest.

cena-rules · Post by **cena-rules** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:50 pm

diddle wrote:
cena-rules wrote:
diddle wrote:My vote stays until Cena makes another post.
to say what?
Do you notice anything about this?
diddle wrote:Yeah, pretty legit, he's an important character, so JOAT would be a good role.

yeah wot about it?

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:50 pm

diddle wrote:
ga7 wrote:Hmm ok. Could anyone enlighten me and the poor folks who don't know shit about Stargate whether this char claim sounds legit?
Yeah, pretty legit, he's an important character, so JOAT would be a good role.

NO!

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:57 pm

cena-rules wrote:
diddle wrote:
cena-rules wrote:
diddle wrote:My vote stays until Cena makes another post.
to say what?
Do you notice anything about this?
diddle wrote:Yeah, pretty legit, he's an important character, so JOAT would be a good role.
yeah wot about it?

You don't notice any mistakes?