lmieszek and Bagulho [cleared]

Leonidas10 · Post by **Leonidas10** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:31 am

These are suspected Secret Alliance

Suspect users: lmieszek and Bagulho

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1374669

Comments: Yellow and Green have rarely attacked each other and when they do it is not in important places (see game log). They have had chances to break up undefened continents but didn't. They left ajacent borders undefended. It is not like they are across the map from each other they are right next to each other. See game log for evidence.

FunkyB · Post by **FunkyB** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:34 pm

I'm in this game, and I must say Leonidas stated that if anyone does not attack an undefended border, he will assume they are cheating.

While he is free to make any assumptions he wishes, it doesn't in any way mean that they are accurate. There are several reasons why someone would not attack an undefended border, I would think he would know this.

I think he justs need to relax, stop jumping to conclusions, and try and treat other people with a little more respect.

edit: je->he

FiveThreeEight · Post by **FiveThreeEight** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:37 pm

I've left undefended bonuses unharmed before. Sometimes you need to in the hope that a person with a bonus can break the strongest player.

sully800 · Post by **sully800** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:46 pm

FiveThreeEight wrote:I've left undefended bonuses unharmed before. Sometimes you need to in the hope that a person with a bonus can break the strongest player.

Agreed, there are definitely times when not breaking a border makes the most sense, even if its undefended.

Without more evidence from multiple games, lmieszek and Bagulho are cleared

Leonidas10 · Post by **Leonidas10** » Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:06 pm

I probably didn't make this clear but I am just saying that their behavior is suspicious not that they are guilty. Also it is not so suspicious that they aren't attacking each other but that they are leaving their borrders undefended.

Herakilla · Post by **Herakilla** » Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:10 pm

Leonidas10 wrote:I probably didn't make this clear but I am just saying that their behavior is suspicious not that they are guilty. Also it is not so suspicious that they aren't attacking each other but that they are leaving their borrders undefended.

its a strategy, ive done it before and it almost always pays off for me. you ignore that player in hopes of either they attack some1 else who is likely stronger or some1 else breaks them and not you