I once played all the maps at the same time as six-player escalating unlimiteds. It was great fun and rather hectic. I think there are only 15 or so maps I haven't played yet.
My set is a bone coat-of-arms and chandelier! How cool is that?
Aerial Attack wrote:I think that the list should include people who have won ALL maps. If someone is missing Midkemia - they can be included but deserve an asterisk as they were afraid to try a new map or were just darn unlucky.
I don't know how often you should update the list. BUT, the list should always include ALL maps [give a grace period of 10-30? days] whenever a map is released. Someone who hasn't won on a map within 10-30 days after it's release for play, doesn't really want to be on the list of having conquered all the maps (or may have left the site ...). I think in much the way you had the first to reach 2000, 2500, and 3000. You should have the first to win 65, 75, 90, 100, 120, etc. maps. Heck, you can even start out people who have at least 50 maps won (3+ player singles) or 50 maps won (teams) or 50 maps won (1 v 1). Not combined - but each. I have 53 three + player singles and 44 heads up (only 16 teams *sigh*).
My vote is for a grace period of 30 days (mainly so that non-prems have a chance to play each map a few times, rather than rely on winning their first or second attempt). I originally liked 10 days because you can knock it out with 4 or 5 speed game attempts.
and let me know about midkemia, you need to have at least played it i think, but got taken away within a week, so hard to win on it, if it is not available anymore so i agree with aerial
I have rethought my position on Midkemia.
I think that if you have won ALL the maps other than Midkemia you deserve to be on the list. If you have played Midkemia - you deserve and asterisk or some other connotation. If you have WON Midkemia then you deserve a second asterisk or connotation.
I figure there will be fewer people with 2 asterisks than there will be those who don't have them. My reasoning is that if a new player were to join today, play all 64 maps and eventually win once on each. They would have a claim to all maps - but could never [well highly unlikely] get to even play (much less win) Midkemia. I am assuming that as time goes by - there will be more people in this boat than there will be who have won Midkemia.
Aerial Attack wrote:I think that the list should include people who have won ALL maps. If someone is missing Midkemia - they can be included but deserve an asterisk as they were afraid to try a new map or were just darn unlucky.
I don't know how often you should update the list. BUT, the list should always include ALL maps [give a grace period of 10-30? days] whenever a map is released. Someone who hasn't won on a map within 10-30 days after it's release for play, doesn't really want to be on the list of having conquered all the maps (or may have left the site ...). I think in much the way you had the first to reach 2000, 2500, and 3000. You should have the first to win 65, 75, 90, 100, 120, etc. maps. Heck, you can even start out people who have at least 50 maps won (3+ player singles) or 50 maps won (teams) or 50 maps won (1 v 1). Not combined - but each. I have 53 three + player singles and 44 heads up (only 16 teams *sigh*).
My vote is for a grace period of 30 days (mainly so that non-prems have a chance to play each map a few times, rather than rely on winning their first or second attempt). I originally liked 10 days because you can knock it out with 4 or 5 speed game attempts.
and let me know about midkemia, you need to have at least played it i think, but got taken away within a week, so hard to win on it, if it is not available anymore so i agree with aerial
I have rethought my position on Midkemia.
I think that if you have won ALL the maps other than Midkemia you deserve to be on the list. If you have played Midkemia - you deserve and asterisk or some other connotation. If you have WON Midkemia then you deserve a second asterisk or connotation.
I figure there will be fewer people with 2 asterisks than there will be those who don't have them. My reasoning is that if a new player were to join today, play all 64 maps and eventually win once on each. They would have a claim to all maps - but could never [well highly unlikely] get to even play (much less win) Midkemia. I am assuming that as time goes by - there will be more people in this boat than there will be who have won Midkemia.
im currently in active games on all the new maps (and midekemia 2 is now live)
Don't now why people on here don't like being cooks, remember under siege: A former SEAL, now cook, is the only person who can stop a gang of terrorists when they sieze control of a US Navy battleship.
i stopped it at the pac man or conquer man map, because of all the new maps, so many coming out lately, but if you want to continue this thread, we can and i can update it
Aww, Blitz, get my name off that list. I played through all the maps that existed about six months ago. There have been like twenty new maps since then.
My set is a bone coat-of-arms and chandelier! How cool is that?