Mr_Adams wrote:Vegan, you don't eat meat or ANY animal products. I.E. no milk, eggs, butter. also no animal products like leather or sheep's wool. trust me, this pertains to the subject.
Bullshit! I think it would be better to do that, but I say do whatever the f*ck you want! I can't live without meat!
what a Hypocracy!!!(not a real word) You are a hypocrite, because human emissions (cars, factories ect.) acount for .08% of green house gases, where as live stock accounts for 26%. There for any non-vegan environmentalist- green house gas B.S. thrower is a hypocrite. (the other 73.02% of green house gases are from wild animals and things like volcanic eruptions.)
Care to give a source for those numbers?
I seem to have misplaced it, but the book was Glen Beck's "An inconvinient book". If I had the book I'd giove you a page number...
Yeah...but Glen Beck presumably takes his information from somewhere else, as I doubt he finds time to research the effects of CO2 on our atmosphere in the last couple hundred years while having a popular show on CNN.
Edit: Appereantly Amazon-reviewers say he doesn't actually cite any of his sources....
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."
Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
I'd extend that order somewhat, think big so to speak... in other words, I'd have my armed forces round up large numbers of buff ginger/red-haired women, and then deliver them to my presidential suite for several weeks of boning related fun.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
mtg....that type of government or idea might work if we were living in the world of wyoming, meaning there was a large amount of natural resources, including available land and at best an industrial economy. Or if it was a recolonized world or something i guess. However, the world we live in, pretty much cant be wyoming extrapolated on a world wide scale.
got tonkaed wrote:mtg....that type of government or idea might work if we were living in the world of wyoming, meaning there was a large amount of natural resources, including available land and at best an industrial economy. Or if it was a recolonized world or something i guess. However, the world we live in, pretty much cant be wyoming extrapolated on a world wide scale.
I was merely saying how I would run the world if that ever came to be. Basically leaving things as is, except if military forces are called upon from certain countries, those countries would send troops. Not the UN that tends to pussyfoot around a lot, and where US forces make up the vast majority of the troops, but where nations will provide military forces when called upon, thus taking alot of the burden off of the US's shoulders and distribbuting it around the world to each nation's capacity to do so. And if a nation tries to usurp that balance, then the punishment would be to execute or punish in another way, the leaders. I don't quite follow how you would relate it to Wyoming.
Well, I like her soft, ivory skin...bright blue eyes, I could stare into for days, discovering her depth and beauty of soul...feminine structure, so dear and sweet
But mostly I like the fact that she is a young little slut, that probably hasnt been given the deep, reaming thrusts that I have in store for her.
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
Well, I like her soft, ivory skin...bright blue eyes, I could stare into for days, discovering her depth and beauty of soul...feminine structure, so dear and sweet
But mostly I like the fact that she is a young little slut, that probably hasnt been given the deep, reaming thrusts that I have in store for her.
wow.... that was a little graphic... but i mean, sounds like a good plan to me lol
