Libertarianism is stupid.

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post Reply
mpjh
Posts: 6714
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:32 am
Location: gone

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by mpjh »

Months before the end of the war, Japan's leaders recognized that defeat was inevitable. In April 1945 a new government headed by Kantaro Suzuki took office with the mission of ending the war. When Germany capitulated in early May, the Japanese understood that the British and Americans would now direct the full fury of their awesome military power exclusively against them.

American officials, having long since broken Japan's secret codes, knew from intercepted messages that the country's leaders were seeking to end the war on terms as favorable as possible. Details of these efforts were known from decoded secret communications between the Foreign Ministry in Tokyo and Japanese diplomats abroad.

In his 1965 study, Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam (pp. 107, 108), historian Gar Alperovitz writes:

Although Japanese peace feelers had been sent out as early as September 1944 (and [China's] Chiang Kai-shek had been approached regarding surrender possibilities in December 1944), the real effort to end the war began in the spring of 1945. This effort stressed the role of the Soviet Union ...

In mid-April [1945] the [US] Joint Intelligence Committee reported that Japanese leaders were looking for a way to modify the surrender terms to end the war. The State Department was convinced the Emperor was actively seeking a way to stop the fighting.

A Secret Memorandum

It was only after the war that the American public learned about Japan's efforts to bring the conflict to an end. Chicago Tribune reporter Walter Trohan, for example, was obliged by wartime censorship to withhold for seven months one of the most important stories of the war.

In an article that finally appeared August 19, 1945, on the front pages of the Chicago Tribune and the Washington Times-Herald, Trohan revealed that on January 20, 1945, two days prior to his departure for the Yalta meeting with Stalin and Churchill, President Roosevelt received a 40-page memorandum from General Douglas MacArthur outlining five separate surrender overtures from high-level Japanese officials. (The complete text of Trohan's article is in the Winter 1985-86 Journal, pp. 508-512.)

This memo showed that the Japanese were offering surrender terms virtually identical to the ones ultimately accepted by the Americans at the formal surrender ceremony on September 2 -- that is, complete surrender of everything but the person of the Emperor. Specifically, the terms of these peace overtures included:

* Complete surrender of all Japanese forces and arms, at home, on island possessions, and in occupied countries.
* Occupation of Japan and its possessions by Allied troops under American direction.
* Japanese relinquishment of all territory seized during the war, as well as Manchuria, Korea and Taiwan.
* Regulation of Japanese industry to halt production of any weapons and other tools of war.
* Release of all prisoners of war and internees.
* Surrender of designated war criminals.

Is this memorandum authentic? It was supposedly leaked to Trohan by Admiral William D. Leahy, presidential Chief of Staff. (See: M. Rothbard in A. Goddard, ed., Harry Elmer Barnes: Learned Crusader [1968], pp. 327f.) Historian Harry Elmer Barnes has related (in "Hiroshima: Assault on a Beaten Foe," National Review, May 10, 1958):

The authenticity of the Trohan article was never challenged by the White House or the State Department, and for very good reason. After General MacArthur returned from Korea in 1951, his neighbor in the Waldorf Towers, former President Herbert Hoover, took the Trohan article to General MacArthur and the latter confirmed its accuracy in every detail and without qualification.
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by muy_thaiguy »

Link please.

and http://www.goggle.com doesn't work.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
mpjh
Posts: 6714
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:32 am
Location: gone

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by mpjh »

Better work on your research skills or you will never get out of high school.
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by Juan_Bottom »

muy_thaiguy wrote:Link please.

and http://www.goggle.com doesn't work.

Don't mock him, this is the most interesting thing that I've read on here in a very long time... especially if it's authentic...

mpjh wrote:Better work on your research skills or you will never get out of high school.

I don't have the time now; I have to work soon so I'm going to take a shower and a nap... but I am definitly google-ing the hell out of this later.
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by muy_thaiguy »

mpjh wrote:Better work on your research skills or you will never get out of high school.

And you ought to learn on posting your resources once in awhile, as well as backing off of the petty insults, yes? Otherwise, like in threads before, it will be hard to take your claims even semi-seriously.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
mpjh
Posts: 6714
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:32 am
Location: gone

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by mpjh »

Look, you can whine all you want, but I post enough for you to find it if you don't believe me. If you don't want to do the work, don't read me.
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by muy_thaiguy »

mpjh wrote:Look, you can whine all you want, but I post enough for you to find it if you don't believe me. If you don't want to do the work, don't read me.

:lol: Whining. So now asking for a link that you obviously know so well and is so apparently easy for you to find and post it, yet stubbornly refusing to do your own work, now equates with whining.
Why should I have to do your work for you? If you can take the time to copy and paste such a long article from a website, then surely, it would be faster and easier for you, who already knows the website, to, you know, link it.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
mpjh
Posts: 6714
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:32 am
Location: gone

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by mpjh »

Yep, whine, that is what it is.
User avatar
F1fth
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:15 am
Gender: Male

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by F1fth »

Damnit, you both are annoying me. It's not hard to link it, nor is it hard to look it up.

Here: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v16/v16n3p-4_Weber.html
<>---------------------------<>
......Come play CC Mafia,
.....where happiness lies
<>----------[Link]----------<>

REMEMBER NORSE // REMEMBER DANCING MUSTARD
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by muy_thaiguy »

And upon further looking at IHF,
http://www.ihr.org/
which "argues against the Holocaust," has articles on the "Jewish-Zionist domination of the U.S. political system," "Hitler did not want a war with Poland. Had he wanted war, he would have demanded the return of the entire Polish Corridor taken from Germany in 1919. He wanted Danzig back and Poland as an ally in his anti-Comintern Pact."

Yeah, alternative history is pretty well bogus.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Nobunaga
Posts: 1058
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:09 am
Location: West of Osaka

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by Nobunaga »

muy_thaiguy wrote:And upon further looking at IHF,
http://www.ihr.org/
which "argues against the Holocaust," has articles on the "Jewish-Zionist domination of the U.S. political system," "Hitler did not want a war with Poland. Had he wanted war, he would have demanded the return of the entire Polish Corridor taken from Germany in 1919. He wanted Danzig back and Poland as an ally in his anti-Comintern Pact."

Yeah, alternative history is pretty well bogus.


... CC Forums, Fair & Balanced.

... Sounded rather bogus. As Japanese history was my major back in the day the statement surprised me more than a little. But in truth, the surrender of Japan was a long time coming, inexplicably long in the western view, and it seemed reasonable to listen. University profs do not know / teach everything after all.

... What's the Libertarian view? (to stay on topic).

...
User avatar
jay_a2j
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by jay_a2j »

No, what's stupid is that people think there is a significant difference between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. There is not. What is stupid is that both major parties are in full agreement when it comes to ignoring/destroying the Constitution of the United States. And even more stupid is that the vast majority of Americans DON'T SEE IT! What's stupid is a two party system where no outside third party stands a chance because the media is in bed with the political machine in this country. Now, you can go back to debating Roe v. Wade or sell your SUV to be more green, none of it will matter when your freedom is gone. 8-[
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
thegreekdog
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by thegreekdog »

jay_a2j wrote:No, what's stupid is that people think there is a significant difference between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. There is not. What is stupid is that both major parties are in full agreement when it comes to ignoring/destroying the Constitution of the United States. And even more stupid is that the vast majority of Americans DON'T SEE IT! What's stupid is a two party system where no outside third party stands a chance because the media is in bed with the political machine in this country. Now, you can go back to debating Roe v. Wade or sell your SUV to be more green, none of it will matter when your freedom is gone. 8-[


Excellent! Keep voting third party, jay! Hopefully someday a Libertarian candidate will be invited to a major presidential debate.
User avatar
captain.crazy
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by captain.crazy »

thegreekdog wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:No, what's stupid is that people think there is a significant difference between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. There is not. What is stupid is that both major parties are in full agreement when it comes to ignoring/destroying the Constitution of the United States. And even more stupid is that the vast majority of Americans DON'T SEE IT! What's stupid is a two party system where no outside third party stands a chance because the media is in bed with the political machine in this country. Now, you can go back to debating Roe v. Wade or sell your SUV to be more green, none of it will matter when your freedom is gone. 8-[


Excellent! Keep voting third party, jay! Hopefully someday a Libertarian candidate will be invited to a major presidential debate.


Not until the people have taken this country back by force and slaughtered all puppet masters will there be a third party in office. The absolute power at the top is far too corrupt to even consider such a thing. Electronic voting is a sham!
wake up. This is the end game.

Join our conspiracy clan!
mpjh
Posts: 6714
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:32 am
Location: gone

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by mpjh »

And now we have heard from the crazy.
User avatar
thegreekdog
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by thegreekdog »

mpjh wrote:And now we have heard from the crazy.


Yeah, don't group me with the captain. His name is appropriate.
bbqpenguin
Posts: 226
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:11 am

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by bbqpenguin »

Libertarianism is smart.

do whatever you want to do, as long as you don't f*ck up someone else
mind your own business
take care of yourself, be independent
be responsible, live with the consequences of your actions
keep government small and taxes low to maximize individual liberty


what's stupid about that?
mpjh
Posts: 6714
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:32 am
Location: gone

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by mpjh »

It doesn't work.
bbqpenguin
Posts: 226
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:11 am

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by bbqpenguin »

it's never been tried
mpjh
Posts: 6714
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:32 am
Location: gone

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by mpjh »

Never will be either.
User avatar
thegreekdog
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by thegreekdog »

mpjh wrote:It doesn't work.


It doesn't work? Can you elaborate?
bbqpenguin
Posts: 226
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:11 am

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by bbqpenguin »

mpjh wrote:Never will be either.



only because there are too many voters unwilling to provide for themselves and not have the government take care of them
mpjh
Posts: 6714
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:32 am
Location: gone

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by mpjh »

Bull, only because most of us know that we must help each other and government is one of the most efficient ways to do that.

Libertarianism is only an extreme form of unregulated capitalism -- and we have seen where that gets us.
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by Snorri1234 »

thegreekdog wrote:
mpjh wrote:It doesn't work.


It doesn't work? Can you elaborate?



Because even the most die-hard capitalist will not refuse to help a poor old lady who is sick. Or for that matter, a little kid.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
bbqpenguin
Posts: 226
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:11 am

Re: Libertarianism is stupid.

Post by bbqpenguin »

mpjh wrote:Bull, only because most of us know that we must help each other and government is one of the most efficient ways to do that.

Libertarianism is only an extreme form of unregulated capitalism -- and we have seen where that gets us.



we wouldn't all have to help each other if we would just take care of ourselves
sorry I'm an aggressive Randian. and government isn't efficient at doing anything. seriously, name one thing the government is good at. maybe at blowing shit up, but other than that, not much.

also, unregulated capitalism has gotten us more than 200 years pretty well. sure there were some pretty substantial setbacks along the way, but you can't find any economic system that can go a couple centuries without a major recession or two. also, you could blame the government and the public as much if not more than "capitalistic greed" or whatever you want to call it for the current state of the economy
Last edited by bbqpenguin on Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”