Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Dude, he's like, proving he's not just a 7 year old girl., and that he's smart., and that he's like, a doctor., or a accountant.! or something.; that would know whatever it is.!, he posted.,!?;:.,.!vtmarik wrote:Translation: The fact that Supreme Court Justices can write opinions in Court decisions that have nothing to do with the case at hand or any law is bad.SolidWolf34 wrote:Unexplained Rulings Threaten Rule of Law
In 1972-73, with the stated rationale being the pressing caseload in the federal court of appeals, the Board of the Federal Judicial Center moved to make it permissible to not publish opinions that were routine or had no significant precedential value. At that time, all court rulings always had an opinion written with it explaining the law as it applied to the decision made by the court and detailing the reasons upon which the judgment was based.
The new rule that limited what was published did not discuss eliminating the opinion that went with a ruling. It simply said that written opinions would not be published or assumed to be cited as precedent in the future.
But quickly, once rulings were not published, a much more insidious practice emerged - a practice which has the potential to completely undermine the rule of law and the liberty and justice it protects in America. The practice is that of the issuance by federal appeals courts of unpublished rulings that DO NOT STATE THE LEGAL RATIONALE FOR THEIR DECISION. These types of rulings with no reasoning are called nonopinions. Those nonopinions that are unpublished (the vast majority) are called unpublished nonopinions or unexplained decisions. Depending on the circuit, a nonopinion is called affirmance without opinion, summary order, summary disposition, summary opinion, unpublished order, disposition without opinion, abbreviated disposition, summary affirmance, judgment opinion, or simply, an order. Some states call the practice per curiam affirmance.
[/i]
Relevance: Who the f*ck knows?
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Iliad wrote:I will third that.Neutrino wrote:I second that motion.Anarkistsdream wrote:...............................
Uhmmmm.....
Okay.
What, exactly, does that large paragraph have to do with anything?
I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.freezie wrote:Iliad wrote:I will third that.Neutrino wrote:I second that motion.Anarkistsdream wrote:...............................
Uhmmmm.....
Okay.
What, exactly, does that large paragraph have to do with anything?
Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
Actually, that paragraph talks about irrelevant opinions written into case decisions made by the US Supreme Court and what other courts refer to them as.freezie wrote:Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying othersvbomb21 wrote:I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.freezie wrote:Iliad wrote:I will third that.Neutrino wrote:I second that motion.Anarkistsdream wrote:...............................
Uhmmmm.....
Okay.
What, exactly, does that large paragraph have to do with anything?
Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
This is what you're sixthing...At least the fact we don't care.firth4eva wrote: ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying others
SolidWolf34 wrote:Unexplained Rulings Threaten Rule of Law
In 1972-73, with the stated rationale being the pressing caseload in the federal court of appeals, the Board of the Federal Judicial Center moved to make it permissible to not publish opinions that were routine or had no significant precedential value. At that time, all court rulings always had an opinion written with it explaining the law as it applied to the decision made by the court and detailing the reasons upon which the judgment was based.
The new rule that limited what was published did not discuss eliminating the opinion that went with a ruling. It simply said that written opinions would not be published or assumed to be cited as precedent in the future.
But quickly, once rulings were not published, a much more insidious practice emerged - a practice which has the potential to completely undermine the rule of law and the liberty and justice it protects in America. The practice is that of the issuance by federal appeals courts of unpublished rulings that DO NOT STATE THE LEGAL RATIONALE FOR THEIR DECISION. These types of rulings with no reasoning are called nonopinions. Those nonopinions that are unpublished (the vast majority) are called unpublished nonopinions or unexplained decisions. Depending on the circuit, a nonopinion is called affirmance without opinion, summary order, summary disposition, summary opinion, unpublished order, disposition without opinion, abbreviated disposition, summary affirmance, judgment opinion, or simply, an order. Some states call the practice per curiam affirmance.
[/i]
The motion is seventhedfirth4eva wrote:ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying othersvbomb21 wrote:I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.freezie wrote:Iliad wrote:I will third that.Neutrino wrote:I second that motion.Anarkistsdream wrote:...............................
Uhmmmm.....
Okay.
What, exactly, does that large paragraph have to do with anything?
Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
pancakemix wrote:The motion is seventhedfirth4eva wrote:ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying othersvbomb21 wrote:I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.freezie wrote:Iliad wrote:I will third that.Neutrino wrote: I second that motion.
What, exactly, does that large paragraph have to do with anything?
Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
lol...i'll 8th it...freezie wrote:pancakemix wrote:The motion is seventhedfirth4eva wrote:ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying othersvbomb21 wrote:I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.freezie wrote:Iliad wrote: I will third that.
Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
A kiss ( or hug..your choice ) to whoever eight it.
wow thats a funny line. what was he thinking!?!?!?! and solid you said he HAS been reported, what have they done about it so far? did they laugh at you as well?SolidWolf34 wrote:Shut the hell up!! You have been reported to my Local Police Office, I will make sure something is done about what you just said!!Anarkistsdream wrote:Why don't I come say that to your face....? Was that a question? If so, use a question mark...SolidWolf34 wrote:shut the hell up man. why don't u come say it to my face.. all you know what to do is cut squid and take them to bed with you.. so WATCH ITAnarkistsdream wrote:We alreayd all know Solidwolf is a dildo... Why is this even important...
Oh... yeah... I'ts NOT!
And PM me your address, I'll make sure you get something nice in the mail.
number nine number nine number nine number nine . . .s.xkitten wrote:lol...i'll 8th it...freezie wrote:pancakemix wrote:The motion is seventhedfirth4eva wrote:ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying othersvbomb21 wrote:I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.freezie wrote:
Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
A kiss ( or hug..your choice ) to whoever eight it.