captain.crazy wrote:I have heard that talc, which is used on condoms, is suspected of being associated with cervical cancer.
http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/ovary/riskfactors/ wrote:A systematic review has been conducted to attempt to clarify the evidence regarding this potential risk factor. Sixteen papers contributed data to the meta-analysis (a total of 11,933 subjects from 15 case control studies and one cohort study). Overall results showed a statistically significant increased risk associated with talc use, RR = 1.33 (95%CI 1.16 to 1.45). However, further inspection of the data failed to show any clear relationship between dose and response, and therefore the authors of the review concluded that this association is likely to be spurious and due to uncontrolled confounding or selection biases13. Since then, a combined analysis of two case-control studies showed a RR of 1.36 (95%CI 1.14 to 1.63) for regular talc use, and a significant trend of increasing risk with more frequent use.37 A third case-control study reported an OR of 1.17 (95%CI 1.01 to 1.36) for ovarian cancer for women who reported perineal use of talcum powder and a significant trend with years of use.49
Just saying... maybe God told Pope that condoms were actually bad for women.
Ah, another reason to never use condoms! Woooo!
"Bare" in mind, though, that this only applied to latex condoms. Lambskin condoms don't count.
captain.crazy wrote:I have heard that talc, which is used on condoms, is suspected of being associated with cervical cancer.
http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/ovary/riskfactors/ wrote:A systematic review has been conducted to attempt to clarify the evidence regarding this potential risk factor. Sixteen papers contributed data to the meta-analysis (a total of 11,933 subjects from 15 case control studies and one cohort study). Overall results showed a statistically significant increased risk associated with talc use, RR = 1.33 (95%CI 1.16 to 1.45). However, further inspection of the data failed to show any clear relationship between dose and response, and therefore the authors of the review concluded that this association is likely to be spurious and due to uncontrolled confounding or selection biases13. Since then, a combined analysis of two case-control studies showed a RR of 1.36 (95%CI 1.14 to 1.63) for regular talc use, and a significant trend of increasing risk with more frequent use.37 A third case-control study reported an OR of 1.17 (95%CI 1.01 to 1.36) for ovarian cancer for women who reported perineal use of talcum powder and a significant trend with years of use.49
Just saying... maybe God told Pope that condoms were actually bad for women.
Ah, another reason to never use condoms! Woooo!
"Bare" in mind, though, that this only applied to latex condoms. Lambskin condoms don't count.
You mean lamb-intestine condoms, right?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
captain.crazy wrote:I have heard that talc, which is used on condoms, is suspected of being associated with cervical cancer.
http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/ovary/riskfactors/ wrote:A systematic review has been conducted to attempt to clarify the evidence regarding this potential risk factor. Sixteen papers contributed data to the meta-analysis (a total of 11,933 subjects from 15 case control studies and one cohort study). Overall results showed a statistically significant increased risk associated with talc use, RR = 1.33 (95%CI 1.16 to 1.45). However, further inspection of the data failed to show any clear relationship between dose and response, and therefore the authors of the review concluded that this association is likely to be spurious and due to uncontrolled confounding or selection biases13. Since then, a combined analysis of two case-control studies showed a RR of 1.36 (95%CI 1.14 to 1.63) for regular talc use, and a significant trend of increasing risk with more frequent use.37 A third case-control study reported an OR of 1.17 (95%CI 1.01 to 1.36) for ovarian cancer for women who reported perineal use of talcum powder and a significant trend with years of use.49
Just saying... maybe God told Pope that condoms were actually bad for women.
Ah, another reason to never use condoms! Woooo!
"Bare" in mind, though, that this only applied to latex condoms. Lambskin condoms don't count.
Napoleon Ier wrote:Of course, it never occurred to any of you clueless imbeciles that if you're going to fornicate/rape/adulterate, you might as well use a condom because you're going to be in mortal sin anyway?
Except in Africa, this is largely about MARRIED people.
Napoleon Ier wrote:No, Of course it didn't, you'd all rather feel really fucking intellectual by criticizing the Catholic Church. That works, doesn't it, anyone who hates the Pope must one enlightened motherfucker! I bet you think you're Voltaire himself come again to destroy the non-condom using and hence exponentially multiplying Legions of Rome.
The only idiot here is the one going on a rant without even half-way reading the thread... OR knowing much about the subject, either!
