Your Pope Strikes Again!

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Johnny Rockets
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 9:58 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Contact:

Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by Johnny Rockets »

The more I hear the ramblings of this out of touch archaic moron, the more respect I loose for anything remotely Catholic. This turd is killing more Africans through his ancient stands on birth contol then colonialism.

Read the comments below the article at this link. Does anyone think Pope Sith is fit to lead?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/ma ... ndoms-aids

This faith is starting to smell of pious extreemism in the worst....


JRock

Code: Select all

http://www.growingyourbaby.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/North-Carolina-Prevention-Project-ad-300x208.jpg
User avatar
jonesthecurl
Posts: 4625
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Gender: Male
Location: disused action figure warehouse
Contact:

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by jonesthecurl »

It is of great concern that the fabric of African life, its very source of hope and stability, is threatened by divorce, abortion, prostitution, human trafficking and a contraception mentality," he added.

Yeah, all those problems are about equivalent. Having sex is just like trafficking in people.
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
User avatar
Frigidus
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by Frigidus »

jonesthecurl wrote:It is of great concern that the fabric of African life, its very source of hope and stability, is threatened by divorce, abortion, prostitution, human trafficking and a contraception mentality," he added.

Yeah, all those problems are about equivalent. Having sex is just like trafficking in people.
Not to mention that a good deal of "African life" is far removed from hope and stability.
User avatar
b.k. barunt
Posts: 1270
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by b.k. barunt »

A quick study of history will show you that the Catholic church has given us far worse than they are able to give now. If they've been rendered powerless enough that all they can do is waggle fingers at the immoral, i can live with that. Better by far than an inquisition or a crusade. Is the present pope fit to lead? Hell, considering the plethora of altar boy diddlers they had to choose from . . .


Morde Manubrium Meum
Honibaz
User avatar
Johnny Rockets
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 9:58 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Contact:

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by Johnny Rockets »

It's fucking disgusting. They are in a position where they could help so Much!

Grrrrrrrr

J
User avatar
oVo
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: Your Pope Pokes Again!

Post by oVo »

Not my pope.
User avatar
jonesthecurl
Posts: 4625
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Gender: Male
Location: disused action figure warehouse
Contact:

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by jonesthecurl »

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7967173.stm

For what the Lancet has to say about the Pope's stance.
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
Zeppflyer
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 7:34 pm

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by Zeppflyer »

Johnny Rockets wrote:It's fucking disgusting. They are in a position where they could help so Much!

Grrrrrrrr

J
And they do. The Catholic church in particular and Christian churches in general have tens of thousands of missionaries in Africa running schools, refugee camps, hospitals, orphanages, etc. Every year, first world Christians send hundreds of millions of dollars to aid the third world.

I don't mean to imply that other groups do not, just to point out that the Church does do a great deal of good there. Let's not forget that.
User avatar
2dimes
Posts: 13142
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by 2dimes »

Johnny Rocket, welcome to the eleventh century.
User avatar
targetman377
Posts: 2223
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:52 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by targetman377 »

question what works 100% of the time to make the diesase not spread? while aka i think its what the pope said. oh yeah it is ABSTANICE is the one thing that will make aids go away for good :D . Condoms do help prevent the spread of hiv but do not work 100%. so my question is if you were dieing form somthing would you want the cure that works 100% or would you obt for one that works less then 100% of the time? :-s
User avatar
Bovver boy
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 7:18 am
Location: The wrong side of 1900AD

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by Bovver boy »

Johnny Rockets wrote: This turd is killing more Africans through his ancient stands on birth contol then colonialism.
Whats the problem?

They only kill themselves in the long run anyway - maybe the pope is helping speed the process

efficiency.
User avatar
Bovver boy
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 7:18 am
Location: The wrong side of 1900AD

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by Bovver boy »

And it is spelt 'stance', not 'stands'
User avatar
Neoteny
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by Neoteny »

jonesthecurl wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7967173.stm

For what the Lancet has to say about the Pope's stance.
That was applause-worthy.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by PLAYER57832 »

targetman377 wrote:question what works 100% of the time to make the diesase not spread? while aka i think its what the pope said. oh yeah it is ABSTANICE is the one thing that will make aids go away for good :D . Condoms do help prevent the spread of hiv but do not work 100%. so my question is if you were dieing form somthing would you want the cure that works 100% or would you obt for one that works less then 100% of the time? :-s
Nice, if you live in a country with "western" sensibilities.

In Africa, women marry young, often in arranged marriages and saying "no" just is not an option.
Furthermore, in many cases women have such poor medical care that they are likely to die (and their child, of course) or get a fistula or other problems.
User avatar
hecter
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor
Contact:

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by hecter »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
targetman377 wrote:question what works 100% of the time to make the diesase not spread? while aka i think its what the pope said. oh yeah it is ABSTANICE is the one thing that will make aids go away for good :D . Condoms do help prevent the spread of hiv but do not work 100%. so my question is if you were dieing form somthing would you want the cure that works 100% or would you obt for one that works less then 100% of the time? :-s
Nice, if you live in a country with "western" sensibilities.

In Africa, women marry young, often in arranged marriages and saying "no" just is not an option.
Furthermore, in many cases women have such poor medical care that they are likely to die (and their child, of course) or get a fistula or other problems.
Ya, you're talking about a country here where people think that if you have sex with a virgin that you'll be cured of AIDS. People will rape babies to do this. And look how well abstinence only education has worked in the US. I'm sure it'll do wonders for Africa...
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
joecoolfrog
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:29 pm
Gender: Male
Location: London ponds

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by joecoolfrog »

Zeppflyer wrote:
Johnny Rockets wrote:It's fucking disgusting. They are in a position where they could help so Much!

Grrrrrrrr

J
And they do. The Catholic church in particular and Christian churches in general have tens of thousands of missionaries in Africa running schools, refugee camps, hospitals, orphanages, etc. Every year, first world Christians send hundreds of millions of dollars to aid the third world.

I don't mean to imply that other groups do not, just to point out that the Church does do a great deal of good there. Let's not forget that.
This is very true but it does not disguise the fact that the Pope is putting dogma before human lives, he is in in a position to make things better but he is doing the opposite.....its an act of pure evil.
User avatar
captain.crazy
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by captain.crazy »

I have heard that talc, which is used on condoms, is suspected of being associated with cervical cancer.
http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/ovary/riskfactors/ wrote:A systematic review has been conducted to attempt to clarify the evidence regarding this potential risk factor. Sixteen papers contributed data to the meta-analysis (a total of 11,933 subjects from 15 case control studies and one cohort study). Overall results showed a statistically significant increased risk associated with talc use, RR = 1.33 (95%CI 1.16 to 1.45). However, further inspection of the data failed to show any clear relationship between dose and response, and therefore the authors of the review concluded that this association is likely to be spurious and due to uncontrolled confounding or selection biases13. Since then, a combined analysis of two case-control studies showed a RR of 1.36 (95%CI 1.14 to 1.63) for regular talc use, and a significant trend of increasing risk with more frequent use.37 A third case-control study reported an OR of 1.17 (95%CI 1.01 to 1.36) for ovarian cancer for women who reported perineal use of talcum powder and a significant trend with years of use.49
Just saying... maybe God told Pope that condoms were actually bad for women.
joecoolfrog
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:29 pm
Gender: Male
Location: London ponds

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by joecoolfrog »

targetman377 wrote:question what works 100% of the time to make the diesase not spread? while aka i think its what the pope said. oh yeah it is ABSTANICE is the one thing that will make aids go away for good :D . Condoms do help prevent the spread of hiv but do not work 100%. so my question is if you were dieing form somthing would you want the cure that works 100% or would you obt for one that works less then 100% of the time? :-s
Yes well perhaps if the local priests set an example....
In 2001 The Vatican acknowledged ( after 3 years of denial ) that certain African priests, because of the fear of HIV amongst the local girls, had targeted nuns for their sexual activities. Reported cases involved wholesale pregnancies ( 27 in one convent alone ) rape, abortion and forcing nuns to take the contraceptive pill. When asked why the nuns did not resist it was pointed out that in many African cultures it was extremely difficult to refuse a man, especially an elder man and even more so if that man happened to be a priest.
The point is that abstinance is not natural and difficult at the best of times, in Africa it is totaly unfeasible, if priests and nuns cannot resist then what chance have ordinary people.
The Pope is well aware that what he says is not practical , he is taking what he sees as a moral stance in the full knowledge that he is condemning very many people to an early death. Ironically if a certain pope had not met ( some might say very suspiciously ) with sudden demise 30 years ago then we would not have this debate, he wished to loosen the churches stance on contraception but did not get the chance :roll:
User avatar
Neoteny
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by Neoteny »

I would also note that abstinence is not 100% effective at preventing the spread of disease. And saying silly things like that only hurt the cause.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
pimpdave
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Gender: Male
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters
Contact:

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by pimpdave »

Neoteny wrote:I would also note that abstinence is not 100% effective at preventing the spread of disease. And saying silly things like that only hurt the cause.
Neoteny is absolutely right. AIDS is spread through needle sharing as well (plus other methods), but aside from that (since one could argue that abstinence means to abstain from all behaviors that could lead to HIV infection), one needs look no farther than the tragic genocide that took place in Rwanda in 1994 for an example.

Rape and mass rape were used as weapons by the Hutus against the Tutsis. Many thousands of women have contracted AIDS as a result and often passed the disease on to the progeny that sprung forth from those marauding rapists.

It's absolutely horrible.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by PLAYER57832 »

captain.crazy wrote:I have heard that talc, which is used on condoms, is suspected of being associated with cervical cancer.
http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/ovary/riskfactors/ wrote:A systematic review has been conducted to attempt to clarify the evidence regarding this potential risk factor. Sixteen papers contributed data to the meta-analysis (a total of 11,933 subjects from 15 case control studies and one cohort study). Overall results showed a statistically significant increased risk associated with talc use, RR = 1.33 (95%CI 1.16 to 1.45). However, further inspection of the data failed to show any clear relationship between dose and response, and therefore the authors of the review concluded that this association is likely to be spurious and due to uncontrolled confounding or selection biases13. Since then, a combined analysis of two case-control studies showed a RR of 1.36 (95%CI 1.14 to 1.63) for regular talc use, and a significant trend of increasing risk with more frequent use.37 A third case-control study reported an OR of 1.17 (95%CI 1.01 to 1.36) for ovarian cancer for women who reported perineal use of talcum powder and a significant trend with years of use.49
Just saying... maybe God told Pope that condoms were actually bad for women.


Except a lot of condoms DON'T use talc...

(and if you read through your synopsis even, you see the main point is that most of the studies were biased and the 2 recent ones show only a slight increase for women who use talc all the time... )


I suppose you believe the poppycock that AIDS was created to eradicate homosexuals, too.?

You know, it wasn't so long ago that Tuberculosis was "shameful" and "the result of poor morality associated with poverty".
User avatar
captain.crazy
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by captain.crazy »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
captain.crazy wrote:I have heard that talc, which is used on condoms, is suspected of being associated with cervical cancer.
http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/ovary/riskfactors/ wrote:A systematic review has been conducted to attempt to clarify the evidence regarding this potential risk factor. Sixteen papers contributed data to the meta-analysis (a total of 11,933 subjects from 15 case control studies and one cohort study). Overall results showed a statistically significant increased risk associated with talc use, RR = 1.33 (95%CI 1.16 to 1.45). However, further inspection of the data failed to show any clear relationship between dose and response, and therefore the authors of the review concluded that this association is likely to be spurious and due to uncontrolled confounding or selection biases13. Since then, a combined analysis of two case-control studies showed a RR of 1.36 (95%CI 1.14 to 1.63) for regular talc use, and a significant trend of increasing risk with more frequent use.37 A third case-control study reported an OR of 1.17 (95%CI 1.01 to 1.36) for ovarian cancer for women who reported perineal use of talcum powder and a significant trend with years of use.49
Just saying... maybe God told Pope that condoms were actually bad for women.


Except a lot of condoms DON'T use talc...

(and if you read through your synopsis even, you see the main point is that most of the studies were biased and the 2 recent ones show only a slight increase for women who use talc all the time... )


I suppose you believe the poppycock that AIDS was created to eradicate homosexuals, too.?

You know, it wasn't so long ago that Tuberculosis was "shameful" and "the result of poor morality associated with poverty".
Sorry that you seem to have taken offense, but I said that "I heard" that talk causes cervical cancer. But the last sentence of my citation tells me that there is likely a trend towards correlation of cervical cancer and talk powder.

I definitely do not believe that AIDS was manufactured to eradicate homosexuals, I believe that it has always been around, only became more wide spread as global travels became more prevalent. I also don't believe that the pope did not take his opinion on condom use based on any science, rather, that abstinence is the preferred method of birth control. To be sure, I think that, for several reasons, he is right about that. Condoms are not 100% safe against STD's nor do they claim to be 100% effective against pregnancy. Also, if you are having sex with lots of people, then you are exposing yourself to all kinds of social and potentially life threatening dangers.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by PLAYER57832 »

captain.crazy wrote: I definitely do not believe that AIDS was manufactured to eradicate homosexuals, I believe that it has always been around, only became more wide spread as global travels became more prevalent. I also don't believe that the pope did not take his opinion on condom use based on any science, rather, that abstinence is the preferred method of birth control. To be sure, I think that, for several reasons, he is right about that. Condoms are not 100% safe against STD's nor do they claim to be 100% effective against pregnancy. Also, if you are having sex with lots of people, then you are exposing yourself to all kinds of social and potentially life threatening dangers.
The problem is that the Pope is not just making a scientific, and yes, factual statement that "abstinence is better". He is making a moralistic pronouncement. Further, not even a light one ... he compares condoms and even divorce to prostitution and human trafficking ... THOSE comparisons put his talk well beyond a simple pronouncement that "abstinence is best"

It is of great concern that the fabric of African life, its very source of hope and stability, is threatened by divorce, abortion, prostitution, human trafficking and a contraception mentality," he added.
Furthermore, the church has the power and is USING that power to prevent instruction in any non-abstinence method of birth control for even adult, married women.

Its like saying that firemen passing out fire extinguishers and smoke alarms is wrong because it gives people the idea that its OK to be careless with fire.
User avatar
captain.crazy
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by captain.crazy »

PLAYER57832 wrote:Its like saying that firemen passing out fire extinguishers and smoke alarms is wrong because it gives people the idea that its OK to be careless with fire.
I do see what you are saying, and I mostly agree with you. In actually I was half kidding about my initial post, but I do think that condom use should be considered only secondary to the preferred abstinence.

Your analogy is not very sound, because fire can occur without the misuse of fire... it can occur due to chemical mishap as well as electrical failure. I hardly can think of a way that a person can accidentally misuse his penis. Sex is an intentional thing.
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: Your Pope Strikes Again!

Post by Snorri1234 »

captain.crazy wrote:I have heard that talc, which is used on condoms, is suspected of being associated with cervical cancer.
http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/ovary/riskfactors/ wrote:A systematic review has been conducted to attempt to clarify the evidence regarding this potential risk factor. Sixteen papers contributed data to the meta-analysis (a total of 11,933 subjects from 15 case control studies and one cohort study). Overall results showed a statistically significant increased risk associated with talc use, RR = 1.33 (95%CI 1.16 to 1.45). However, further inspection of the data failed to show any clear relationship between dose and response, and therefore the authors of the review concluded that this association is likely to be spurious and due to uncontrolled confounding or selection biases13. Since then, a combined analysis of two case-control studies showed a RR of 1.36 (95%CI 1.14 to 1.63) for regular talc use, and a significant trend of increasing risk with more frequent use.37 A third case-control study reported an OR of 1.17 (95%CI 1.01 to 1.36) for ovarian cancer for women who reported perineal use of talcum powder and a significant trend with years of use.49
Just saying... maybe God told Pope that condoms were actually bad for women.
Ah, another reason to never use condoms! Woooo!
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”