Moderator: Community Team
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
No shit. The record has me voting for you.Epitaph1 wrote:Let the record show that Wing thinks I am the scummiest player in this game.
how big of extension?Marashu wrote:He has not yet replied to my prod. I am giving him until tomorrow morning - if there is no reply, I will be replacing him, and giving an extension.ptlowe wrote: 9.virus90 (8,9) Should be kicked for inactivity
1) Depends on how long it takes to find a replacement, but likely 24-48 hours, so that not only can they catch up over the weekend, but there will be enough time for some discussion with the replacement.benga wrote:how big of extension?
why just not kick him?
I will update that in the OP. Lack of majority will result in a no-lynch.HotShot53 wrote:Mod, just to be sure, if there is no majority by the deadline, is there a no-lynch or is there a plurality lynch? I just looked at the rules, and don't see it mentioned either way.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Thats sarcasm before Mitch votes me
Ok, everyone was assuming that, but figured it was best to make sure that's how you intended it.Marashu wrote:I will update that in the OP. Lack of majority will result in a no-lynch.HotShot53 wrote:Mod, just to be sure, if there is no majority by the deadline, is there a no-lynch or is there a plurality lynch? I just looked at the rules, and don't see it mentioned either way.
...HotShot53 wrote:Even Mitch and AoG have been making more reasoned arguments than their usual.
Still you but benga's push for night has me wondering about him and why the big rush .unless he has gifts or works better at night .possible scum thereEpitaph1 wrote:Mitch, who are you willing to lynch right now.
Me and who else?
Sorry, that probably came out not quite how I intended... I meant that everyone often thinks you are scum whether or not you are just because of your style of posting, but this game you do not sound scummy by default to me.Army of GOD wrote:...HotShot53 wrote:Even Mitch and AoG have been making more reasoned arguments than their usual.
well thank you, but by saying that you probably put a target on yourself,I hope notHotShot53 wrote:Sorry, that probably came out not quite how I intended... I meant that everyone often thinks you are scum whether or not you are just because of your style of posting, but this game you do not sound scummy by default to me.Army of GOD wrote:...HotShot53 wrote:Even Mitch and AoG have been making more reasoned arguments than their usual.
Haha I know, I'm kidding. I have a naturally scummy play styleHotShot53 wrote:Sorry, that probably came out not quite how I intended... I meant that everyone often thinks you are scum whether or not you are just because of your style of posting, but this game you do not sound scummy by default to me.Army of GOD wrote:...HotShot53 wrote:Even Mitch and AoG have been making more reasoned arguments than their usual.
I severly doubt that mets would say this unless it was his honest opinion and he was town. He knows if AoG flips scum at any point this post will be a pretty big strike against him,and i dont think he would even chance it if he were scum.Metsfanmax wrote:I feel the need to vouch for AOG. As he says, this playstyle really isn't unusual for him. He strikes me as much more town-aligned this game than he has in other games, if anything.
Especially since he asked about the no lynch rule,then here he says noone is a strong enough case to lynch,which kinda implies that we ought to go no lynch.I still think HS is scum,but its going to have to wait for tomorrow unless we get the extension.HotShot53 wrote: As to who I'd vote to lynch other than wing... right now I don't see any of the cases as strong enough to lynch someone off of really, and no-one has been pressured enough to even get close to L-2 (although somehow we have 3 claims anyway lol). Even Mitch and AoG have been making more reasoned arguments than their usual.
lol mitch, you really are madmadmitch wrote:Still you but benga's push for night has me wondering about him and why the big rush .unless he has gifts or works better at night .possible scum thereEpitaph1 wrote:Mitch, who are you willing to lynch right now.
Me and who else?
So Hotshot, how experienced are you?HotShot53 wrote: Honestly, what scum would suggest no-lynching day 1? A newbie, maybe... but anyone who is experienced knows that the words "No-lynch" are almost immediately followed up by "lynch him!" I wondered how long it would take someone to jump on the easy case of "lynch anyone who mentions no-lynch", and it looks like you took the bait. To me, that's a negative for you.
That's what I've been trying to determine by asking everyone for their lists, but not enough people are cooperating. I tried.*Pixar* wrote:so all of us not being on the same page is suggesting a no lynch Day1, that will give scum a huge advantage, is anyone willing to switch their vote to another member who has 3+ votes on them who you think is scum. So we can at least get a claim out of someone besides pt's rushed claim
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this