Moderator: Community Team

As for step 2, is any user here a master of martial arts who lives in the sewers?TA1LGUNN3R wrote:hm. I count four turtles in that picture. And they've been exposed to some weird liquid.
Step 1 complete.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
I nominate Tails.MeDeFe wrote:As for step 2, is any user here a master of martial arts who lives in the sewers?TA1LGUNN3R wrote:hm. I count four turtles in that picture. And they've been exposed to some weird liquid.
Step 1 complete.
Is there anybody who is a master of martial arts who has a pet rat (which we will expose to the strange liquid)?MeDeFe wrote:As for step 2, is any user here a master of martial arts who lives in the sewers?TA1LGUNN3R wrote:hm. I count four turtles in that picture. And they've been exposed to some weird liquid.
Step 1 complete.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Whoever's selling those things didn't intend the critters to live very long. In fact, the faster they die the better, because then the kids will buy a new chain every week.mviola wrote:If these are aimed at kids, these would last less than a day. What if they have a bunch of books and then they throw their bag down on the keychain? This wasn't thought out very well.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
That's a truthful yet morbid way to look at this.MeDeFe wrote:Whoever's selling those things didn't intend the critters to live very long. In fact, the faster they die the better, because then the kids will buy a new chain every week.mviola wrote:If these are aimed at kids, these would last less than a day. What if they have a bunch of books and then they throw their bag down on the keychain? This wasn't thought out very well.
Capitalism!rdsrds2120 wrote:That's a truthful yet morbid way to look at this.MeDeFe wrote:Whoever's selling those things didn't intend the critters to live very long. In fact, the faster they die the better, because then the kids will buy a new chain every week.mviola wrote:If these are aimed at kids, these would last less than a day. What if they have a bunch of books and then they throw their bag down on the keychain? This wasn't thought out very well.
-rd
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
I was looking at this from the "killing animals" standpoint.pimpdave wrote:Capitalism!rdsrds2120 wrote:That's a truthful yet morbid way to look at this.MeDeFe wrote:Whoever's selling those things didn't intend the critters to live very long. In fact, the faster they die the better, because then the kids will buy a new chain every week.mviola wrote:If these are aimed at kids, these would last less than a day. What if they have a bunch of books and then they throw their bag down on the keychain? This wasn't thought out very well.
-rd
In this case, killing animals is good for consumption and drives demand.mviola wrote:I was looking at this from the "killing animals" standpoint.pimpdave wrote:Capitalism!rdsrds2120 wrote:That's a truthful yet morbid way to look at this.MeDeFe wrote:Whoever's selling those things didn't intend the critters to live very long. In fact, the faster they die the better, because then the kids will buy a new chain every week.mviola wrote:If these are aimed at kids, these would last less than a day. What if they have a bunch of books and then they throw their bag down on the keychain? This wasn't thought out very well.
-rd
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:In this case, killing animals is good for consumption and drives demand.mviola wrote:I was looking at this from the "killing animals" standpoint.pimpdave wrote:Capitalism!rdsrds2120 wrote:That's a truthful yet morbid way to look at this.MeDeFe wrote: Whoever's selling those things didn't intend the critters to live very long. In fact, the faster they die the better, because then the kids will buy a new chain every week.
-rd
Capitalism! Yay!
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
That(animals dying) would only be the case when you idiots didn't let them out of the bag after a week and keep em as pets.MeDeFe wrote:In this case, killing animals is good for consumption and drives demand.
Capitalism! Yay!