Moderator: Community Team
If I link to a video that links to a video that links to a video that links to a video that links to child porn, could I be banned?TA1LGUNN3R wrote:reported for posting child porn.
-TG
That's some sick shit.Army of GOD wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mg4hbOa9klQ&feature=related
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Did it get worse? Because I couldn't go any further than about 22 secs...MeDeFe wrote:That's some sick shit.Army of GOD wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mg4hbOa9klQ&feature=related
Yes. Because I would know the whole time that was your intent.Army of GOD wrote:If I link to a video that links to a video that links to a video that links to a video that links to child porn, could I be banned?TA1LGUNN3R wrote:reported for posting child porn.
-TG
It definitely didn't get any better. The same obnoxious music, new obnoxious music after 4 minutes, the same socially sanctioned child abuse, new clothes, new poses, a constant stream of seizure-inducing colours and patterns. The same frozen grin on her face, like a tortured soul forced to work in hell's PR department, insisting that everything is fine and dandy while they are having live ferrets anally inserted and people are being raped and mutilated around them.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Did it get worse? Because I couldn't go any further than about 22 secs...MeDeFe wrote:That's some sick shit.Army of GOD wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mg4hbOa9klQ&feature=related
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
My first concern is how you knew this. Based on that I'd say you're equally sick as them.Army of GOD wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mg4hbOa9 ... re=related
This video is most popular with:
Gender Age
Female 13-17
Male 45-54
Male 55-64
Sick motherfuckers
Yes because youtube are known for their great variety of childporn videosTA1LGUNN3R wrote:reported for posting child porn.
-TG
We don't need anymore Behring Breivik in this world so number 1 please.legendkiller717 wrote:i wasn't sure whether to vomit or go on a menopausal mother killing spree at the next one of these pageants...
The point of this thread, though, isn't to point out the creepiness of the actual video (it's creepy, though) but to point out that it's most popular with MEN IN THEIR FIFTIES.MeDeFe wrote:It definitely didn't get any better. The same obnoxious music, new obnoxious music after 4 minutes, the same socially sanctioned child abuse, new clothes, new poses, a constant stream of seizure-inducing colours and patterns. The same frozen grin on her face, like a tortured soul forced to work in hell's PR department, insisting that everything is fine and dandy while they are having live ferrets anally inserted and people are being raped and mutilated around them.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Did it get worse? Because I couldn't go any further than about 22 secs...MeDeFe wrote:That's some sick shit.Army of GOD wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mg4hbOa9klQ&feature=related
It makes me sad that 98 people have officially liked that video, and that the vast majority of the comments are positive in some way, saying she's cute or beautiful and treating those pageants like they're a good thing. I can't even tell what she looks like under all the paint and glitter.
Shouldn't you just list that as Male 45-64 seeming as 54 and 55 are adjacent numbers?This video is most popular with:
Gender Age
Female 13-17
Male 45-54
Male 55-64