Moderator: Community Team
What? I don't think you understand what I'm proposing.freezie wrote:So you would give homosexuals absolutly no chances? Since church is too homophobe to let them live their lifes.
No. Just no.
That is what confused me. Can you please clarify that.btownmeggy wrote:There should be no civil marriage. Then, we wouldn't have to worry about gay marriage, civil unions, or such nonsense. Churches could choose to marry whom they please. Individuals could choose to marry whom they please. Fundamentalists wouldn't have to worry about the sanctity of marriage being tarnished, because no marriages between gays would be sanctified by the state nor the fundamentalist's own Pentacostal, holy-rolling, queer-hating church.

The nonsense I'm referring to is the debate, scandalizing, and hatred spurred by the question of gay marriage.hecter wrote:That is what confused me. Can you please clarify that.btownmeggy wrote:There should be no civil marriage. Then, we wouldn't have to worry about gay marriage, civil unions, or such nonsense. Churches could choose to marry whom they please. Individuals could choose to marry whom they please. Fundamentalists wouldn't have to worry about the sanctity of marriage being tarnished, because no marriages between gays would be sanctified by the state nor the fundamentalist's own Pentacostal, holy-rolling, queer-hating church.
Amen, sister!btownmeggy wrote:No legal marriages. There can be marriages, but the government should have nothing to do with them: before, during, or after the fact.Anarkistsdream wrote:She's saying there should be no marriages... PERIOD!
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
btownmeggy wrote:What? I don't think you understand what I'm proposing.freezie wrote:So you would give homosexuals absolutly no chances? Since church is too homophobe to let them live their lifes.
No. Just no.
Plenty of churches support gay marriage. Who says marriage even has to be ordained by a church? My gay friend officiates weddings, for Pete's sake.

In Canada, mon ami? 'Fraid not. For example, Canada has... Unitarian-Universalists? Nearly all accept gay marriage. Methodists? A great many Methodist ministers perform gay weddings. Reform Jewish? The same boat as the Methodists.freezie wrote: Well...Here Church is offcially against gay marriage. Every. Probably not from the same country, so maybe it would work for you. Not here.
Sorry.
Kid, you still aren't getting this... She says that straights and gays, neither one, should be bound by any sort of government union... If you want to be married, fine, but there are no laws, benefits, or anything else with it...freezie wrote:btownmeggy wrote:What? I don't think you understand what I'm proposing.freezie wrote:So you would give homosexuals absolutly no chances? Since church is too homophobe to let them live their lifes.
No. Just no.
Plenty of churches support gay marriage. Who says marriage even has to be ordained by a church? My gay friend officiates weddings, for Pete's sake.
Well...Here Church is offcially against gay marriage. Every. Probably not from the same country, so maybe it would work for you. Not here.
Sorry.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
btownmeggy wrote:In Canada, mon ami? 'Fraid not. For example, Canada has... Unitarian-Universalists? Nearly all accept gay marriage. Methodists? A great many Methodist ministers perform gay weddings. Reform Jewish? The same boat as the Methodists.freezie wrote: Well...Here Church is offcially against gay marriage. Every. Probably not from the same country, so maybe it would work for you. Not here.
Sorry.
Sorry.

Anarkistsdream wrote:Kid, you still aren't getting this... She says that straights and gays, neither one, should be bound by any sort of government union... If you want to be married, fine, but there are no laws, benefits, or anything else with it...freezie wrote:btownmeggy wrote:What? I don't think you understand what I'm proposing.freezie wrote:So you would give homosexuals absolutly no chances? Since church is too homophobe to let them live their lifes.
No. Just no.
Plenty of churches support gay marriage. Who says marriage even has to be ordained by a church? My gay friend officiates weddings, for Pete's sake.
Well...Here Church is offcially against gay marriage. Every. Probably not from the same country, so maybe it would work for you. Not here.
Sorry.
Do you not get the point?

You think they are going to report every gay marriage on the news? You are only going to hear about how the homophobic church is refusing rights, because that's what makes good television/reading.freezie wrote:btownmeggy wrote:In Canada, mon ami? 'Fraid not. For example, Canada has... Unitarian-Universalists? Nearly all accept gay marriage. Methodists? A great many Methodist ministers perform gay weddings. Reform Jewish? The same boat as the Methodists.freezie wrote: Well...Here Church is offcially against gay marriage. Every. Probably not from the same country, so maybe it would work for you. Not here.
Sorry.
Sorry.
Quebec...There has been some gay marriage, but most I heard was they were refused. At least before..havent heard anything since.
Quebec isn't the same as the rest of Canada, I am afraid.

Unitarian-Universalist representin'!btownmeggy wrote:In Canada, mon ami? 'Fraid not. For example, Canada has... Unitarian-Universalists? Nearly all accept gay marriage. Methodists? A great many Methodist ministers perform gay weddings. Reform Jewish? The same boat as the Methodists.freezie wrote: Well...Here Church is offcially against gay marriage. Every. Probably not from the same country, so maybe it would work for you. Not here.
Sorry.
Sorry.
viperbitex wrote: what the f*ck were the dinosaurs all about?? Did G-Dog wear his silly pants one day 10 million years ago and make them??
You don't have to 'prove' you are the husband/wife, though...unriggable wrote:But there are some rights that let husbands and wives be in more contact, for example the whole money issue, and how they can visit each other in hospitals.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Was that in response to btownmeggy, or me, or someone else? If it was in response to her, I think I agree. Although you're a bit vague. Be less vague.unriggable wrote:But there are some rights that let husbands and wives be in more contact, for example the whole money issue, and how they can visit each other in hospitals.
If you can jsut say 'I'm family' then people could do whatever they wanted. Imagine if somebody wanted to kill you, all they had to do is say 'I'm family'. Besides, right now you have a certificate to prove that you are indeed marriedAnarkistsdream wrote:You don't have to 'prove' you are the husband/wife, though...unriggable wrote:But there are some rights that let husbands and wives be in more contact, for example the whole money issue, and how they can visit each other in hospitals.
You just say, "I'm family."
What about the people who do not take each others surname?
I mean, it really isn't necessary.