Misquote of the Day - Negative opinions and such
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
-
Gen.LeeGettinhed
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:32 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (just south of El USA -- that's Spanish for The USA)
Misquote of the Day - Negative opinions and such
MIsquote of the day: "Negative Opinions are like a penis, its okay to have one, its okay to be proud of it. Just dont take it out in public, wave it around and try and shove it down peoples throats"
-
Mr Changsha
- Posts: 1662
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:42 am
- Gender: Male
Re: Misquote of the Day - Negative opinions and such
I take issue with 'shove'. Personally I prefer to finesse these things. Whether one should bare thrust in public is tricky; there have been moments in my life when I felt it honestly necessary to do it, and while others may have seen things differently I stand by my actions. I stand by my penis. But am I proud of my penis? Well, he has rarely let me down....in footballing terms he is the equivalent of the old-fashioned English centre forward like Steve Bull or dare I say it John Fashanu: not really put it about at the top level, but dependable on a wet weekend in Derby.Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:MIsquote of the day: "Negative Opinions are like a penis, its okay to have one, its okay to be proud of it. Just dont take it out in public, wave it around and try and shove it down peoples throats"
-
BigBallinStalin
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
- Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
- Contact:
Re: Misquote of the Day - Negative opinions and such
To build on Mr Changsha's point, we are missing something fundamental with the OP, and that is consent and mutually beneficial exchange.
With any exchange, there must be some clarification of consent before an exchange can occur. Furthermore, if one person is willing to supply a rousing spectacle in public and if the others have the demand, i.e. agree to this performance ex-ante, then there cannot be a problem with waving one's penis in public. This would be a mutually beneficial exchange.
Of course, the gray area of implied consent can be troublesome, and the exchange ex-post may reveal that the expected profits have failed to offset the opportunity costs for each interested party. Other problems are one of definition. "RE: shoving down throats, how deep will it be? What is the girth? When did you last bathe?"
These considerations should not be overlooked.
With any exchange, there must be some clarification of consent before an exchange can occur. Furthermore, if one person is willing to supply a rousing spectacle in public and if the others have the demand, i.e. agree to this performance ex-ante, then there cannot be a problem with waving one's penis in public. This would be a mutually beneficial exchange.
Of course, the gray area of implied consent can be troublesome, and the exchange ex-post may reveal that the expected profits have failed to offset the opportunity costs for each interested party. Other problems are one of definition. "RE: shoving down throats, how deep will it be? What is the girth? When did you last bathe?"
These considerations should not be overlooked.