Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team


It wouldn't affect the tournament, the foe list doesn't work on tournaments.. not sure about foe and move on, could affect the tournament...

not going to happen. it has never happened before and it won't happen for a single game. was that written into the tournament rules? didn't see it. foe and move on. that is all you can do... not going to be noted. not going to be warned. did nothing wrong. good luck with this.-Jésus noirnolefan5311 wrote:All I was hoping for was a warning or it to be noted.

Are you a mod? That's a legitimate question because you seem to have a lot of conviction in what you're saying.owenshooter wrote:not going to happen. it has never happened before and it won't happen for a single game. was that written into the tournament rules? didn't see it. foe and move on. that is all you can do... not going to be noted. not going to be warned. did nothing wrong. good luck with this.-Jésus noirnolefan5311 wrote:All I was hoping for was a warning or it to be noted.
yeah, i'm confident. you obviously don't read posts. there has been a precedent set and that precedent is routinely enforced. what you are asking for has never happened before and it won't happen for a single game. so, yes, i say it with conviction. go search this forum and look at the multiple closed cases with the same accusation, they are not noted, they are not warned, they are not busted. OP's are told to foe and move on, accordingly... sorry, but you aren't going to get anything out of this other than what i have told you. i don't have to be a mod to know what is going to happen in this case, THERE IS A PRECEDENT. good luck in the future... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noirnolefan5311 wrote:Are you a mod? That's a legitimate question because you seem to have a lot of conviction in what you're saying.owenshooter wrote:not going to happen. it has never happened before and it won't happen for a single game. was that written into the tournament rules? didn't see it. foe and move on. that is all you can do... not going to be noted. not going to be warned. did nothing wrong. good luck with this.-Jésus noirnolefan5311 wrote:All I was hoping for was a warning or it to be noted.
And whether or not anything is officially done, pulling a stunt like that because of hurt feelings IS wrong.

Well, maybe this thread will set a new precedent. If not, oh well.owenshooter wrote:yeah, i'm confident. you obviously don't read posts. there has been a precedent set and that precedent is routinely enforced. what you are asking for has never happened before and it won't happen for a single game. so, yes, i say it with conviction. go search this forum and look at the multiple closed cases with the same accusation, they are not noted, they are not warned, they are not busted. OP's are told to foe and move on, accordingly... sorry, but you aren't going to get anything out of this other than what i have told you. i don't have to be a mod to know what is going to happen in this case, THERE IS A PRECEDENT. good luck in the future... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noirnolefan5311 wrote:Are you a mod? That's a legitimate question because you seem to have a lot of conviction in what you're saying.owenshooter wrote:not going to happen. it has never happened before and it won't happen for a single game. was that written into the tournament rules? didn't see it. foe and move on. that is all you can do... not going to be noted. not going to be warned. did nothing wrong. good luck with this.-Jésus noirnolefan5311 wrote:All I was hoping for was a warning or it to be noted.
And whether or not anything is officially done, pulling a stunt like that because of hurt feelings IS wrong.
p.s.-ask the mods, the black jesus is never wrong...
wait, let me translate.nolefan5311 wrote:Well, maybe this thread will set a new precedent. If not, oh well.owenshooter wrote:yeah, i'm confident. you obviously don't read posts. there has been a precedent set and that precedent is routinely enforced. what you are asking for has never happened before and it won't happen for a single game. so, yes, i say it with conviction. go search this forum and look at the multiple closed cases with the same accusation, they are not noted, they are not warned, they are not busted. OP's are told to foe and move on, accordingly... sorry, but you aren't going to get anything out of this other than what i have told you. i don't have to be a mod to know what is going to happen in this case, THERE IS A PRECEDENT. good luck in the future... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noirnolefan5311 wrote:Are you a mod? That's a legitimate question because you seem to have a lot of conviction in what you're saying.owenshooter wrote:not going to happen. it has never happened before and it won't happen for a single game. was that written into the tournament rules? didn't see it. foe and move on. that is all you can do... not going to be noted. not going to be warned. did nothing wrong. good luck with this.-Jésus noirnolefan5311 wrote:All I was hoping for was a warning or it to be noted.
And whether or not anything is officially done, pulling a stunt like that because of hurt feelings IS wrong.
p.s.-ask the mods, the black jesus is never wrong...

This thread has devolved into you trying to convince me that I have wasted my time. That in and of itself seems like a waste of time. The mods will look at it or they won't and they'll warn him or they won't. Honestly, it's not that important to me either way. I just wanted it on the record. Maybe you think that's a waste of time. I don't really care.owenshooter wrote:wait, let me translate.nolefan5311 wrote:Well, maybe this thread will set a new precedent. If not, oh well.owenshooter wrote:yeah, i'm confident. you obviously don't read posts. there has been a precedent set and that precedent is routinely enforced. what you are asking for has never happened before and it won't happen for a single game. so, yes, i say it with conviction. go search this forum and look at the multiple closed cases with the same accusation, they are not noted, they are not warned, they are not busted. OP's are told to foe and move on, accordingly... sorry, but you aren't going to get anything out of this other than what i have told you. i don't have to be a mod to know what is going to happen in this case, THERE IS A PRECEDENT. good luck in the future... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noirnolefan5311 wrote:Are you a mod? That's a legitimate question because you seem to have a lot of conviction in what you're saying.owenshooter wrote:not going to happen. it has never happened before and it won't happen for a single game. was that written into the tournament rules? didn't see it. foe and move on. that is all you can do... not going to be noted. not going to be warned. did nothing wrong. good luck with this.-Jésus noirnolefan5311 wrote:All I was hoping for was a warning or it to be noted.
And whether or not anything is officially done, pulling a stunt like that because of hurt feelings IS wrong.
p.s.-ask the mods, the black jesus is never wrong...
yes, you are going to be the one, despite your lack of any convincing evidence that surpasses all the other complaints, that gets the precedent changed...
*eyes rolling out of my black jesus skull*... good luck... shoot me a PM when they ban IamCaffeine, for life...-Jésus noir
p.s.-throw in the fact that former moderators NEVER get busted or warned, and one has to question why you brought this against him...

Wrong... With your logic you should have eliminated the weaker player... Why? You made stronger player your direct competition, so if you get points as much as the stronger player, you will not pass anyone in the rankings table. So what was your motive, to go up in the rankings table or something else? If I understand correctly the score is restarted in round 6.iAmCaffeine wrote:Incorrect unfortunately. It does help my chances in the overall tournament.
Before this game ended nolefan5311 and the other player both had one win in eight games. I remain on zero. Working on the basis that nolefan is better than the other player, I decided my chances of moving up the scoreboard were better if the lesser player had two wins. Since we're not yet at elimination stages I have time to improve my current position, helped more by the fact that someone less likely to win games has more points than somebody who I do expect to win games.
I hope this makes sense.
The question is... If foe list doesn't work, and players are not warned for unfair play how can a player protect himself from unwanted risk?Donelladan wrote:It wouldn't affect the tournament, the foe list doesn't work on tournaments.. not sure about foe and move on, could affect the tournament...
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis




If you report the PM's then King A can see themnolefan5311 wrote:Just FYI, there are also pms to me from the accused in which he states he felt bad about taking that game away from me, then offered to somehow make it up to me (maybe by throwing another game in the tourney which is still ongoing). I will try to figure out how to post screenshots from my phone.

This is true, but doesn't change the situation. I had to take the game from you to put myself in the best situation, as already explained.nolefan5311 wrote:Just FYI, there are also pms to me from the accused in which he states he felt bad about taking that game away from me, then offered to somehow make it up to me (maybe by throwing another game in the tourney which is still ongoing). I will try to figure out how to post screenshots from my phone.

GoranZ wrote:Wrong... With your logic you should have eliminated the weaker player... Why? You made stronger player your direct competition, so if you get points as much as the stronger player, you will not pass anyone in the rankings table. So what was your motive, to go up in the rankings table or something else? If I understand correctly the score is restarted in round 6.iAmCaffeine wrote:Incorrect unfortunately. It does help my chances in the overall tournament.
Before this game ended nolefan5311 and the other player both had one win in eight games. I remain on zero. Working on the basis that nolefan is better than the other player, I decided my chances of moving up the scoreboard were better if the lesser player had two wins. Since we're not yet at elimination stages I have time to improve my current position, helped more by the fact that someone less likely to win games has more points than somebody who I do expect to win games.
I hope this makes sense.
In order for this to be clear: In the next 2 rounds(6 games) lets say weaker player gets 2 points, and both nole and cofeine take 3 points, who will be last on the ranking board? Caffeine 3 points, nole 4 points and weaker player 4 points.
The question is... If foe list doesn't work, and players are not warned for unfair play how can a player protect himself from unwanted risk?Donelladan wrote:It wouldn't affect the tournament, the foe list doesn't work on tournaments.. not sure about foe and move on, could affect the tournament...

Makes perfect sense you are playing the long game.iAmCaffeine wrote:Incorrect unfortunately. It does help my chances in the overall tournament.
Before this game ended nolefan5311 and the other player both had one win in eight games. I remain on zero. Working on the basis that nolefan is better than the other player, I decided my chances of moving up the scoreboard were better if the lesser player had two wins. Since we're not yet at elimination stages I have time to improve my current position, helped more by the fact that someone less likely to win games has more points than somebody who I do expect to win games.
I hope this makes sense.

I'm wrong because you say soiAmCaffeine wrote:@GoranZ
No, you're wrong, though as always you will never accept it. I'm pretty certain the weaker player will not get two wins in the next two rounds. I can realistically get two or three, and yes nolefan5311 might do the same, but he might not. From my perspective this is my best chance.
I also propose for the C/A team to bring decision after the tournament reaches round 6, so they can reevaluate the effects from iAmCaffeine actions based on what happen, and not what can happen.GoranZ wrote:Wrong... With your logic you should have eliminated the weaker player... Why? You made stronger player your direct competition, so if you get points as much as the stronger player, you will not pass anyone in the rankings table. So what was your motive, to go up in the rankings table or something else? If I understand correctly the score is restarted in round 6.iAmCaffeine wrote:Incorrect unfortunately. It does help my chances in the overall tournament.
Before this game ended nolefan5311 and the other player both had one win in eight games. I remain on zero. Working on the basis that nolefan is better than the other player, I decided my chances of moving up the scoreboard were better if the lesser player had two wins. Since we're not yet at elimination stages I have time to improve my current position, helped more by the fact that someone less likely to win games has more points than somebody who I do expect to win games.
I hope this makes sense.
In order for this to be clear: In the next 2 rounds(6 games) lets say weaker player gets 2 points, and both nole and cofeine take 3 points, who will be last on the ranking board? Caffeine 3 points, nole 4 points and weaker player 4 points.
The question is... If foe list doesn't work, and players are not warned for unfair play how can a player protect himself from unwanted risk?Donelladan wrote:It wouldn't affect the tournament, the foe list doesn't work on tournaments.. not sure about foe and move on, could affect the tournament...
that shouldn't be difficult, since no site rules were broken and not a single similar complaint has ever returned a verdict against the accused... however, i do like your "proposal" to the C&A mods... it is kind of cute, you can really tell you don't spend much time in the forums or C&A, for that matter... i'll try to go lightly on you when the accused is cleared... i am sure your intentions are well... to me, you just seem a little misguided. good luck!!! good luck sorting out this tough one, mods!!!-Jésus noirGoranZ wrote:I also propose for the C/A team to bring decision after the tournament reaches round 6, so they can reevaluate the effects from iAmCaffeine actions based on what happen, and not what can happen.
