Playing a game and losing is one thing but he lost almost every game in the last 100 he played not counting the team tournament games which he can't control. I can see losing one game because of bad dice but dropping over 2k points with 0 wins? He real times the games he lost but waits until the last minute in my game or misses turns when he clearly won the game after 2 rounds.eddie2 wrote:so did i just played him 2 days ago. in the game I played him he looked like he was trying to win but had a bad dice streak. I am also in a seriously bad streak of dice just now. losing things like 30 v 8 etc. or using 20 troups to take 4.
Jr24 I know you are better than this one min you are saying he is point dumping, next you are saying he is not finishing the games he has won until the last min. So he is winning the games just choosing not to finish them straight away. I hate to say it but there have been similar players do this with a ruling of we can't tell them when to play and when not to. It don't count as dead beating because he finishes the games. Also it don't count as holding hostage because cc cannot tell him to play as he has 24 hours to play his shot.is it a nasty play style yes it is. But like the cases before yours they are playing within the rules unless cc finally decided to use manipulation of the leaderboards or making the game less enjoyable rule. Because he was high ranked when he started the game and this play style is gonna make players lose triple the points.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Playing a game and losing is one thing but he lost almost every game in the last 100 he played not counting the team tournament games which he can't control. I can see losing one game because of bad dice but dropping over 2k points with 0 wins? He real times the games he lost but waits until the last minute in my game or misses turns when he clearly won the game after 2 rounds.eddie2 wrote:so did i just played him 2 days ago. in the game I played him he looked like he was trying to win but had a bad dice streak. I am also in a seriously bad streak of dice just now. losing things like 30 v 8 etc. or using 20 troups to take 4.
Guilty, both on the receiving and giving end. Not intentionally, but I do notice the difference.xroads wrote: It is also surprising the difference in the level of respect you get from other players when you are ranked lower.
For fucks sake.KraphtOne wrote:The real question is how do you prove that someone is losing on purpose... I mean, it's a tough game...
https://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=17080345KraphtOne wrote:The real question is how do you prove that someone is losing on purpose... I mean, it's a tough game...
Lost every roll for 5 straight rounds... My dice are legendary. Dude even missed 2 turns and won easilybobdakota wrote:https://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=17080345KraphtOne wrote:The real question is how do you prove that someone is losing on purpose... I mean, it's a tough game...
Green is losing on purpose because he doesn't attack. Notice in the game log how green only attacks a couple times. 4 rounds green deploys and ends in 10 seconds. That is not enough time to have bad dice.
Check the log. It took you 10 seconds for you turn. You didn't have time to roll. Plus dumping troops on Santa Fe when you already took Flagstaff is a poor move if you want to win.KraphtOne wrote:Lost every roll for 5 straight rounds... My dice are legendary. Dude even missed 2 turns and won easilybobdakota wrote:https://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=17080345KraphtOne wrote:The real question is how do you prove that someone is losing on purpose... I mean, it's a tough game...
Green is losing on purpose because he doesn't attack. Notice in the game log how green only attacks a couple times. 4 rounds green deploys and ends in 10 seconds. That is not enough time to have bad dice.
Edit: and i mean, it's a tough game...
