[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Despite receiving a warning last week, today Paulatpeace has picked up from where he left off. New pm's and invites sent out shortly after his return from a weeks ban for a separate offence.
Greetings My Friend,
I see you have played Antarctica before. I would very much appreciate the opportunity to play a few games with you. I have invited you to a Best of 5. If you win only 1 or 2 games you will likely come out ahead on points.
If I have invited you before, please accept my apology. I can't remember if I did or not and am looking for players I have never played before. If you do not wish to play the Best of 5 then please do not accept any of the invites. I wish you the best in any case.
Thank you for considering and I hope to see you on the field.
Sincerely,
Paul
Promises of training and joining his clan have now been removed but the targeting of fresh 'Cannon Fodder' continues. Despite the small tweaks to his PM this targeting of inexperienced players is still ranching. If playing new players was his goal, that would easily be achieved by making public games.
josko.ri wrote:Game 17196720 has wrond link, it links to Feudal war game.
Thanks for bringing this up, my hope he will be punished by not learning from the first offense and give to Conqueror slot to someone deserving it.
What about the monthly leaderboard, should he be removed there too or not?
Given that he didnt get removed from it with his last offence, I doubt he'd get removed this time if the accused is found guilty.
hmm, this would be his second warning for the same crime right? doesn't that have consequences?
Yes, from warning to 1 month ban. But I think he shouldve been removed for first offence or not in general. Xroads also didnt get removed from monthly, even though he got 1 month ban.
12druid has only played Antarctica 6 times, never on Poly with Paul's settings.
Keefie, I have played Antarctica 4 times only and never with Paul's preferred settings. If he had sent me the invite to best of five would that have been ok for you?
If not, then who can he invite?
If yes, then is it so that the conquerer can only invite generals and above to play with him?
12druid has only played Antarctica 6 times, never on Poly with Paul's settings.
Keefie, I have played Antarctica 4 times only and never with Paul's preferred settings. If he had sent me the invite to best of five would that have been ok for you?
If not, then who can he invite?
If yes, then is it so that the conquerer can only invite generals and above to play with him?
This manhunt is ridiculous. Please stop it.
If you consider quads and poly to be the same, then twice on his preferred settings if I'm not mistaken. Game 15009000. You probably wouldve been a free pass because you're friends and clanmates. If I myself had been asked to play, I wouldve been slghtly offended knowing the details around it. And yes, I'm currently no general but have also achieved a score of 4700, so I think we can forego that detail.
Extreme Ways wrote:
If you consider quads and poly to be the same, then twice on his preferred settings if I'm not mistaken. Game 15009000. You probably wouldve been a free pass because you're friends and clanmates. If I myself had been asked to play, I wouldve been slghtly offended knowing the details around it. And yes, I'm currently no general but have also achieved a score of 4700, so I think we can forego that detail.
1 game was quad the 3 others were standard. If we would consider poly and quad to be the same then we would probably appoint Paul with poly Antarctica to take care of some of the clan war quads. But we don't consider the two the same.
So you are saying that Paul could invite only his friends to his games? But others can invite whoever? You don't think that's a bit discriminating?
12druid has only played Antarctica 6 times, never on Poly with Paul's settings.
Keefie, I have played Antarctica 4 times only and never with Paul's preferred settings. If he had sent me the invite to best of five would that have been ok for you?
If not, then who can he invite?
If yes, then is it so that the conquerer can only invite generals and above to play with him?
This manhunt is ridiculous. Please stop it.
Lex Usi wrote:
Extreme Ways wrote:
If you consider quads and poly to be the same, then twice on his preferred settings if I'm not mistaken. Game 15009000. You probably wouldve been a free pass because you're friends and clanmates. If I myself had been asked to play, I wouldve been slghtly offended knowing the details around it. And yes, I'm currently no general but have also achieved a score of 4700, so I think we can forego that detail.
1 game was quad the 3 others were standard. If we would consider poly and quad to be the same then we would probably appoint Paul with poly Antarctica to take care of some of the clan war quads. But we don't consider the two the same.
So you are saying that Paul could invite only his friends to his games? But others can invite whoever? You don't think that's a bit discriminating?
You generalise my answer to a specific question. Not only that, you further seem to think I only have this opinion when I'm talking about PaP. I don't know whether you intend to use silly rhetorics to get the public opinion on your side, whether it's my English that is failing, whether it's your English that is failing (we're both non-native speakers), or whether you just dont understand what I mean.
Poly and quads aren't the same. That is why I think Jabajabba also couldve been included: he has played antartica quads a few times, but not poly. In quads you can follow a leader, in quads you have to fend for yourself.
