New Recruits & Team Game Change *Rejected*

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply
User avatar
AngryAnderson
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:09 am
Gender: Male
Location: Norfolk

New Recruits & Team Game Change *Rejected*

Post by AngryAnderson »

One of the most frustrating things I am finding at present is the no. of times a new player will join a multiples game then deadbeat without taking a turn.

How about not allowing players to join a multiples game until they have complete 5 singles games?

Not sure if it would be difficult to code in, but it would stop several multiples games from becoming farsicle from the start.

:twisted:
You want to make alliances? Play doubles/triples games and stay out of my single player games lame brain!
User avatar
HighBorn
Posts: 3013
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:22 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Kentucky

Post by HighBorn »

yes im sorry to say i have seen that happen to angry at least 4 seperate times /..
User avatar
AngryAnderson
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:09 am
Gender: Male
Location: Norfolk

Post by AngryAnderson »

Is this possible to implement?

Otherwise, experienced players will just switch to private games, as we see a lot of now, or simply drop a game if they get the chance, when they see they are to be paired with a player on their first game.
You want to make alliances? Play doubles/triples games and stay out of my single player games lame brain!
bryanbr
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 12:47 pm

Rename Doubles and Triples to Team Games

Post by bryanbr »

I recommend renaming Doubles and Triples to something more sensible:

Team Game (Two Players)
Team Game (Three Players)

That way newbies will know what is going on. Instead of attacking their allies as has happened numerous times with me and I've only played about 10 games.

This is how I'm doing it:

http://tidestone.sourceforge.net/grandstrategy_2.gif
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24919
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Post by AndyDufresne »

As for the last post...Doubles and Triples is pretty self explanatory. And they just sound classier too. ;)


--Andy
User avatar
TitusFinn
Posts: 510
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 7:37 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA USA

Post by TitusFinn »

I agree Angry. Very frustrating.
bryanbr
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 12:47 pm

Post by bryanbr »

AndyDufresne wrote:As for the last post...Doubles and Triples is pretty self explanatory. And they just sound classier too. ;)


--Andy
Doubles and Triples are in almost no way self explanatory.

Let's see: Doubles refers to three teams of two players. Um, that is no way self explanatory. I have never seen a multiplayer computer game where team play was referred to as "Doubles".

You can play doubles in tennis, but that is two sets of two players.

Now, the only common language (American English) use of the word Triples is a three base hit in American baseball.

The terms are confusing and non-sensical.

Continue to use them, and you will continue to see newbies attacking their Teamates in Team Games.
User avatar
AK_iceman
Posts: 5705
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:39 pm

Post by AK_iceman »

bryanbr wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:As for the last post...Doubles and Triples is pretty self explanatory. And they just sound classier too. ;)


--Andy
Doubles and Triples are in almost no way self explanatory.

Let's see: Doubles refers to three teams of two players. Um, that is no way self explanatory. I have never seen a multiplayer computer game where team play was referred to as "Doubles".

You can play doubles in tennis, but that is two sets of two players.

Now, the only common language (American English) use of the word Triples is a three base hit in American baseball.

The terms are confusing and non-sensical.

Continue to use them, and you will continue to see newbies attacking their Teamates in Team Games.
This makes no sense whatsoever. Unless you are 8 years old you should know what doubles and triples mean. The only reason newbs attack their partners is because they want to play now, so they join a game with only 1 player needed to start without looking at the game type. Then they just attack whoever is closest.
User avatar
gavin_sidhu
Posts: 1428
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 6:16 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by gavin_sidhu »

I totally agree. There should be a screening process for new players. Negative feedback does nothing if they are never going to play again. Im currently in two games (actually only one, because i just lost the second) where i have had new players as allies who have deadbeated. Im currently playing in game 34599 against two players because both my teamates and one on the opposite side have deadbeated.
User avatar
AK_iceman
Posts: 5705
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:39 pm

Post by AK_iceman »

this is just a statistic i read at the WAW website but it says that 4 out 6 new players join games and then never come back to play them. I think thats about right.
User avatar
terrafutan
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:56 pm

Post by terrafutan »

Find some partners AA and then you won't have this problem
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”