how many people on this site are here because they love the idea of war? How many are here because they simply like the idea of strategy and out witting people?
There seems to be a few people who love the war factor - let me know so i can put you on my ignore list.
Yeah, it's got to be the strategy. If I loved war, I'd buy Halo or some other 1st person shooter. But Risk is not only the strategy, it's often a good dose of psychology in the chat. You can't win all the time, but sometimes you can psyche out your opponents even when you don't deserve to win.
AAFitz wrote:There will always be cheaters, abusive players, terrible players, and worse. But we have every right to crush them.
MeDeFe wrote:This is a forum on the internet, what do you expect?
MR. Nate wrote:Yeah, it's got to be the strategy. If I loved war, I'd buy Halo or some other 1st person shooter. But Risk is not only the strategy, it's often a good dose of psychology in the chat. You can't win all the time, but sometimes you can psyche out your opponents even when you don't deserve to win.
Long-time player of strategic games. PnP games, small (and not-so-small) piles of little cardboard counters, computer games, cards, figs...
Some of my favorites:
ANYTHING computerized... (turn-based, never liked RT strategy, too much clicking)
STARFIRE 3rd Ed or later
EMPIRE deluxe
CATAN Settlers, Starfarers, Seafarers, whatever...
ROBORALLY
EMPIRE BUILDER
AXIS and ALLIES (the original. spinoffs need not apply)
DIPLOMACY and SUPREMACY, although either can turn into a flamewar with unreasonable amounts of hurt feelings, depending on the players...
Strategy-hound here.... always loved chess and draughts when i was growing - loved Risk, too...
get pretty bored of the most of the so-called RTS on computers - they're not strategy, they're "outbuild and wipeout", and not particularly challenging...
that said - Civ and Total War are both kicka$$ series...
and loving all these on-line strategy games on the internet now - great to play against a brain rather than a set of algorithms
My main reason for playing is to pretend I'm a visionary leader who spreads socialism all over the world, defeating evil capitalists and fascist pigs on the way, and brings peace and harmony to the human race. Which is why I only play games that I start, as then I'm always red.
Strategy all the way, here! Chess, Risk, Axis and Allies, and (now) Conquer Club.
I am here because playing against the human players is so much more challenging that some computer program that you eventually figure out how to beat every time.
Stopper wrote:My main reason for playing is to pretend I'm a visionary leader who spreads socialism all over the world, defeating evil capitalists and fascist pigs on the way, and brings peace and harmony to the human race. Which is why I only play games that I start, as then I'm always red.
I don't particularly like the idea of a war, but I am a pretty good strategist. I like to outwit my opponents if I can't overpower them, and if I can overpower them, I do both.