Moderator: Community Team
That's certainly one way of putting it.unriggable wrote:Chain reaction. Parents look to the gov't to make difficult decisions (spanking) for their kids and become more lazy, more decisions are made by the gov't to protect kids on seemingly easy issues.
WORK THE f*ck OUT, YOU FAT FUCKS.
... Hey, is that avatar the guy from ... what was it?.. "Red Dead Revolver"?muy_thaiguy wrote:That's certainly one way of putting it.unriggable wrote:Chain reaction. Parents look to the gov't to make difficult decisions (spanking) for their kids and become more lazy, more decisions are made by the gov't to protect kids on seemingly easy issues.
WORK THE f*ck OUT, YOU FAT FUCKS.
Better believe it.Nobunaga wrote:... Hey, is that avatar the guy from ... what was it?.. "Red Dead Revolver"?muy_thaiguy wrote:That's certainly one way of putting it.unriggable wrote:Chain reaction. Parents look to the gov't to make difficult decisions (spanking) for their kids and become more lazy, more decisions are made by the gov't to protect kids on seemingly easy issues.
WORK THE f*ck OUT, YOU FAT FUCKS.
...
You sound like you are surprised by this or it is something new? Government's allow things as long as they are not a threat. It just may well be that the obesity problem in the states is such a threat (to maybe future enlistments for army recruitments? they don't want fat soldiers, or maybe even just the general population because a fat workforce would be less productive) that they have had to bring in a measure to counter it.Nobunaga wrote: Every time I read the news I see a story about the Feds banning this, or offerring that. It's frightening, really. How much control do they want?
...
... Well, Radio, perhaps I wasn't paying so much attention when I took off ten years ago. But new or old, it is still much too much.radiojake wrote:Well at least it's an attempt to level out the fact that junk food companies spend millions a year on advertising that brainwashes kids into being stupid fat morons.
You sound like you are surprised by this or it is something new? Government's allow things as long as they are not a threat. It just may well be that the obesity problem in the states is such a threat (to maybe future enlistments for army recruitments? they don't want fat soldiers, or maybe even just the general population because a fat workforce would be less productive) that they have had to bring in a measure to counter it.Nobunaga wrote: Every time I read the news I see a story about the Feds banning this, or offerring that. It's frightening, really. How much control do they want?
...
It's been like this forever. Why do you think some places 'allow' peaceful protest. Because it is no threat.
They didn't care about candy at school because it wasn't a threat, maybe it now is. Seems like how government has always worked to me
Nobunaga wrote: As for fat kids, that's the parents' fault and failed responsibility. Anybody who sees it as otherwise has serious problems.
...
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

... I understand your thinking and I agree that a lot of kids probably do indeed have deadbeat parents. But to follow the course the Feds decide is best for our kids is very dangerous.radiojake wrote:True, but why should a kid have to have the unfortunate burden of having dead beat parents who let the kid become a tubby poomba?
... The problem is, somwhere, some place, this began with encroachment of Federal powers on our daily lives. And the practice has obviously increased to the point where "drawing the line" is increasingly difficult, as this manner of thing is so predominant now it's considered "normal".radiojake wrote: Of all the cases of 'big government' i don't see why this one is bothering you more, or the case that you chose to highlight. (though it seems to me that this is a case of the 'straw that broke camels back' kind of scenario)
When the Feds decide...Nobunaga wrote: ... I understand your thinking and I agree that a lot of kids probably do indeed have deadbeat parents. But to follow the course the Feds decide is best for our kids is very dangerous.
(from the above article)jm_jazzman wrote:When the Feds decide...Nobunaga wrote: ... I understand your thinking and I agree that a lot of kids probably do indeed have deadbeat parents. But to follow the course the Feds decide is best for our kids is very dangerous.
This just reminded me of a story from England I read a while back.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6396457.stm
i dont necessarily disagree with some of the ideas in this post but i have a few questions....CoffeeCream wrote:I don't know why anyone is surprised at this. If the government is going to pay for your health care then it is just a natural further step that they're going to demand that those they are taking care of live lifestyles that will not cost the system too much.
Our educational system is terrible as well. The government has done a fantastic job of screwing that up for us. Europeans think we're a joke. Why would we want the government involved in dictating our healthcare to us as well?
My fear is that if there is a national healthcare system that is forced down our throats, that the elderly will be told it is their duty to die in order to keep costs from rising.
Competition in the healthcare marketplace will drive down costs and force doctors to compete for patients by providing higher quality services.