Moderator: Community Team

im a whiner. your a fukin hyprocrite!! you got pissed coz someone DARED ask you to take your turn and told all the CC community about it..owenshooter wrote:you are a whiner, negative feedback was not warranted in the situation... big deal, you don't like how they played. if "bad play" or "made a dumb move" were legit reasons for neg feedback, we would all have more negs than positives!!!-0
white moose didnt do it to help him win, he done it coz he has shit tactics and instead of growing a back bone and attacking the clearly more dominat player, he attacked me and gave the game to sir.ricco, who clearly won the game with ease!!happy2seeyou wrote:Was White Moose doing it on purpose to help Sir. Ricco win?
Quite right wicked, you have a habit of taking things off topic owen, can't you see hulmey has issues. Calling someone a whiner is, after all, one of those particularly mean and subtle double insults....one change to the letters and position and he would be a winner.wicked wrote:Understand you're upset and were provoked hulmey, but it's easier to discuss things if you remain calm and I don't have to nag you about flaming.
Owen, let's not call people names here eh? It only serves to provoke. If you want to do that, go to FW.
CAN WE KEEP THIS ON TOPIC FRUITFruitcake wrote:Quite right wicked, you have a habit of taking things off topic owen, can't you see hulmey has issues. Calling someone a whiner is, after all, one of those particularly mean and subtle double insults....one change to the letters and position and he would be a winner.wicked wrote:Understand you're upset and were provoked hulmey, but it's easier to discuss things if you remain calm and I don't have to nag you about flaming.
Owen, let's not call people names here eh? It only serves to provoke. If you want to do that, go to FW.

Yeah. There's serious complaining that needs to be done here, and the last thing this thread needs is anyone trying to discuss anything else. Keep your comments about spelling, and owen's flames away from here.hulmey wrote:CAN WE KEEP THIS ON TOPIC FRUIT
well what is the point in leaving feedback if it isnt about the game concerned. I want players to know that the concerned player makes stupid moves and threw the game to the other player!!!Timminz wrote:Yeah. There's serious complaining that needs to be done here, and the last thing this thread needs is anyone trying to discuss anything else. Keep your comments about spelling, and owen's flames away from here.hulmey wrote:CAN WE KEEP THIS ON TOPIC FRUIT
Back on topic:
It has been shown time, and time again that leaving negative feedback based on someone's strategy (or lack thereof) alone is not acceptable. If it gets challenged, it will be deleted. If that's not good enough for you, just wait a little while. When the feedback system is switched over, it won't matter anymore. It's been quite apparent in the discussion of the new system, that feedback is NOT meant to rate a player's skill. That's what points and win percentages are for.
owenshooter wrote:you are a whiner, negative feedback was not warranted in the situation... big deal, you don't like how they played. if "bad play" or "made a dumb move" were legit reasons for neg feedback, we would all have more negs than positives!!!-0
wicked wrote:You can withdraw your own feedback left at any time.
Since ur around wicked, can you explain how u can state a player is good but u cant state he is bad!!!!hulmey wrote:wicked wrote:You can withdraw your own feedback left at any time.
haha...i know that...im making a point!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SHIT, i tried to give him a positive and it wouldnt let mehulmey wrote:Since ur around wicked, can you explain how u can state a player is good but u cant state he is bad!!!!hulmey wrote:wicked wrote:You can withdraw your own feedback left at any time.
haha...i know that...im making a point!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Actually i'll give him a good feedback now
I know I'm not wicked, but it seems pretty obvious why that's the case. Have you ever submitted a positive feedback for deletion? Do you expect the mods to spend their time reading every feedback ever left? Negs get deleted, Positives do not. If you'd like to go check on everyone's feedback to make sure they aren't being rated well due to their skill, go ahead. I'm sure the mods would love all the extra work to track down, and delete all those positive feedbacks that were based on someone's skill, or even, god forbid, retaliatory positives.hulmey wrote:Since ur around wicked, can you explain how u can state a player is good but u cant state he is bad!!!!
Of course. But those are submitted for moderation. My point is that, unless someone has a problem with the feedback they've been left, it won't be deleted, or even looked at, because the mods have a lot of better ways to spend their time.hahaha3hahaha wrote:Yes positives get deleted more often than you think, when people give a negative feedback submitted as a positive its deleted...
its just bullshit....what does feedback mean? thats what i was doing! the repoert from the mods said it wasnt factual. f*ck thAT, after knocking me out, the other player won in 2 turns!!!!Timminz wrote:Of course. But those are submitted for moderation. My point is that, unless someone has a problem with the feedback they've been left, it won't be deleted, or even looked at, because the mods have a lot of better ways to spend their time.hahaha3hahaha wrote:Yes positives get deleted more often than you think, when people give a negative feedback submitted as a positive its deleted...
The guidelines also state feedback is meant to be an indication of a persons reputation on CC. This is (or was meant to be) mainly a gaming site, where people play a game, how are their gaming skills, whether good or bad, then not relevant for their reputation?Feedback Guidelines
* Leave only fair and factual comments that relate to a specific game.
* Do not leave feedback for trivial things like missing an occasional turn.
* Do not use foul language.
* Do not fish for feedback (i.e. leave positive feedback to get positive feedback in return).
* Do not leave retaliatory feedback (i.e. leave negative feedback in revenge of negative feedback).
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.