
Version 1
Moderator: Cartographers


Are you kidding? Of course.MrBenn wrote:I've had the idea of a Battle of Hastings map floating in my head for a little while.
The idea is to have the general area of the South-East of England with Norman boats coming across the English Channel, and an inset of the battle-ground
Does this idea have any merit?
Hope this diagram helps towards your final product.English
Commanders" KKing Harold and his brothers Gyrth and Leofwine
Numbers: 2000 housecards, 5000 fyrdmen
Normans
Commander: William of Normandy
Left Wing: Count Alan of Brittany
Centre: William Normandy
Right Wing: Eustace of Boulogne
Numbers: 8000 archers, infantry and cavalry

I think you mean unreasonably knowledgeable, by the sound of it...Incandenza wrote:Okay, I just squealed like a little girl when I saw the thread title...
So, yes, please do make a Hastings map. But I would vote for a battle map, rather than your first image, which appears to be more of a campaign map.
Graphically, you can't go wrong using the Bayeux Tapestry as some sort of backdrop/flourish.
And just to warn you, I'm reasonably knowledgeable about the battle (and the surrounding circumstances), so I'll prolly be a pain in the butt.
Should I be afraid?Incandenza wrote:Okay, I just squealed like a little girl...
In my head I've got a bit of both going on... setting the scene with Saxon troops caught up North, Norman armies coming over the channel, and then the melee on the Senlac plain...Incandenza wrote:So, yes, please do make a Hastings map. But I would vote for a battle map, rather than your first image, which appears to be more of a campaign map.
I've seen pictures, but am tempted to actually go and have a look at itIncandenza wrote:Graphically, you can't go wrong using the Bayeux Tapestry as some sort of backdrop/flourish.

Seems tricky, if for no other reason a campaign map might end up being little different from a basic map of England from York southward...MrBenn wrote:In my head I've got a bit of both going on... setting the scene with Saxon troops caught up North, Norman armies coming over the channel, and then the melee on the Senlac plain... Hopefully I'll be able to get a combination of the whole campaign, and the actual battle.
I saw it back when I was in high school. It's incredible, I highly recommend nipping across the channel next time you get the chance. Might give you some good ideas.MrBenn wrote:I've seen pictures, but am tempted to actually go and have a look at itIncandenza wrote:Graphically, you can't go wrong using the Bayeux Tapestry as some sort of backdrop/flourish.
This is the sort of thing I've had going on in my head, along with archer bombardments, possible 'capital' bonusses for holding the Kings (of which there would be 3 or 4: William, Harold, Tostig & Harald?) - or even an objective of holding all the kings and calling peace in the land? (ha ha)Incandenza wrote:Another idea would be to have two maps, one a basic england map with a dozen or so terits, and then insets for Hastings and/or the Channel crossing and/or Stamford Bridge, which would be more complicated.



Most definitely...Incandenza wrote:Okay, I just squealed like a little girl when I saw the thread title...

Well, you've already sorta got it set up so that it''s somewhat arms race style, i.e.the anglo-saxons have their terits and the normans have their terits and one can't attack the other except thru hastings... theoretically you'd make EVERYTHING in hastings neutral (mostly 1s or 2s, but maybe a couple higher for bonus purposes), and everyone gets dropped throughout england and normandy, so the goal is to consolidate your territory, then move into hastings for lucrative bonuses and move beyond to crush the opponent(s).MrBenn wrote:There must be some way to facilitate a more Saxon v Norman battle.... perhaps we could tinker with the XML a bit...



According to hearsay (not the pop group), 1066 is the most common PIN and alarm code in the UK...whitestazn88 wrote:what is the significance of this battle? i'm just wondering for my own purposes. it looks like a cool idea though
Wikipedia??Incandenza wrote:Wkipedia is your friend.
Thanks for the concern mibi. Clarity will be crucial, and will be easier to get right once I've got the structure sorted (ie once I've defined territories etc.)mibi wrote:this map is going to get confusing real fast. try to keep it in check please.

Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
