Moderator: Community Team

saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
magiccarpet wrote:well, there are too many idiots asking questions like this and spoiling the forums
you don't HAVE to play every map you know
this is actually a very good thread. so chill out and stop calling names. i like the variety, and the medals are now making you try more maps that you would never venture onto before... however, i feel that too many maps are rushed out of the foundry without being ready; das schloss, pacific northwest, battle for australia, all come to mind... i love the variety and options of the maps. and if you only want to play something in the "original spirit" stick to classic and world...-0magiccarpet wrote:well, there are too many idiots asking questions like this and spoiling the forums
you don't HAVE to play every map you know

<mod edit>lozzini wrote:magiccarpet wrote:well, there are too many idiots asking questions like this and spoiling the forums
you don't HAVE to play every map you know
you speak like you have vast experiance, yet yu are a new recruit with 4 posts


Or in order of popularity based on games played in last month perhaps ...Iliad wrote:I get what the OP was trying to say. Perhaps the maps need to be cleaned up(instead of them being in alphabetical order we could have them in gameplay, theme or some other grouping)

I have suggested this every time this or related topics come up. Nobody pays attention. Nobody cares. People who specialize in a map/have a couple of favs make the games... everybody else who prefers to shop for opponent quality joins rather than creates... thus you have little to no cross pollination.Iliad wrote:I get what the OP was trying to say. Perhaps the maps need to be cleaned up(instead of them being in alphabetical order we could have them in gameplay, theme or some other grouping)

I think a favorites page is a bad idea. See above re: lack of cross-pollination. Categorical organization is the way to go.RjBeals wrote:I think there was a map selection project that was taking place, but the coder quit. But it's a priority on lack's list of to-do's. Believe me, we're about to break the 100 maps mark, and there is a lot of stuff out there to pick from. I think whomever suggested a "favorites" page to organize only the maps you like was a grand idea.