Moderator: Community Team
muahahahacairnswk wrote:yeh! tournie of the 5 fighting the 6 on the keypad...and the 6 won in this instance.DiM wrote:was there a tourney on it??Gozar wrote:Wow! Look at Crossword go!
no, but you're welcome to add that dissection if you like...Wwoody123 wrote:Great work... really cool info to know.
Have you considered ranking them by percentage increase instead of raw increase?
e.g. BeNeLux going from 124 to 129 is better than North America going from 203 to 208.

I like how it is now. It's a 'what have you done for me lately' look at the maps.Wwoody123 wrote:Great work... really cool info to know.
Have you considered ranking them by percentage increase instead of raw increase?
e.g. BeNeLux going from 124 to 129 is better than North America going from 203 to 208.
I like a lot of those maps. Wide appeal or not, some people like them. Also, there are plenty of popular new maps as well.hulmey wrote:its quite sad that alot of new maps are right at the bottom of the chart
hehehehe LOL you can't get out of that quickly Woody123....i've never used not having something as an excuse....Wwoody123 wrote:Haha... I don't have the raw spreadsheet data or else I might.

go ed...edbeard wrote:I like a lot of those maps. Wide appeal or not, some people like them. Also, there are plenty of popular new maps as well.hulmey wrote:its quite sad that alot of new maps are right at the bottom of the chart
You could actually participate in the process instead of always talking about how the new map suck.

Dear Ed,edbeard wrote:I like a lot of those maps. Wide appeal or not, some people like them. Also, there are plenty of popular new maps as well.hulmey wrote:its quite sad that alot of new maps are right at the bottom of the chart
You could actually participate in the process instead of always talking about how the new map suck.

