MAP MOVEMENT STATS 21 SEP 08 & MAP FOUNDRY LINKS

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:02 pm

Is anyone else interested in these stats?

owenshooter · Post by **owenshooter** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:15 pm

i'll go to the map foundry for my nerd updates!!! you KNOW blitz is interested!!!-0

CubColtPacer · Post by **CubColtPacer** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:52 pm

I'm very interested in the stats. Thanks so much for posting them.

Coleman · Post by **Coleman** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:26 pm

Could you remove foundry news from the first topic?

Edit: Also, I check these at least once every week.

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 4:10 am

Lastest stats - 3 weekly summary.

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 8:17 am

nice work cairnswk

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 8:19 am

cairnswk wrote:Lastest stats - 3 weekly summary.

oh 3 week summary, not a month, kool

every 3 weeks now

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:13 pm

Blitzaholic wrote: oh 3 week summary, not a month, kool
every 3 weeks now

well, only when i don't do it every fortnight!

Gozar · Post by **Gozar** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:23 pm

Wow! Look at Crossword go!

DiM · Post by **DiM** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:31 pm

Gozar wrote:Wow! Look at Crossword go!

was there a tourney on it??

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:54 pm

DiM wrote:
Gozar wrote:Wow! Look at Crossword go!
was there a tourney on it??

yeh! tournie of the 5 fighting the 6 on the keypad...and the 6 won in this instance.

DiM · Post by **DiM** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:16 am

cairnswk wrote:
DiM wrote:
Gozar wrote:Wow! Look at Crossword go!
was there a tourney on it??
yeh! tournie of the 5 fighting the 6 on the keypad...and the 6 won in this instance.

muahahaha

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:51 pm

Stats 23 Mar 08

Wwoody123 · Post by **Wwoody123** » Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:09 pm

Great work... really cool info to know.

Have you considered ranking them by percentage increase instead of raw increase?

e.g. BeNeLux going from 124 to 129 is better than North America going from 203 to 208.

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:11 pm

Wwoody123 wrote:Great work... really cool info to know.

Have you considered ranking them by percentage increase instead of raw increase?

e.g. BeNeLux going from 124 to 129 is better than North America going from 203 to 208.

no, but you're welcome to add that dissection if you like...

Wwoody123 · Post by **Wwoody123** » Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:13 pm

Haha... I don't have the raw spreadsheet data or else I might.

edbeard · Post by **edbeard** » Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:19 pm

Wwoody123 wrote:Great work... really cool info to know.

Have you considered ranking them by percentage increase instead of raw increase?

e.g. BeNeLux going from 124 to 129 is better than North America going from 203 to 208.

I like how it is now. It's a 'what have you done for me lately' look at the maps.

hulmey · Post by **hulmey** » Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:25 am

its quite sad that alot of new maps are right at the bottom of the chart

edbeard · Post by **edbeard** » Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:35 am

hulmey wrote:its quite sad that alot of new maps are right at the bottom of the chart

I like a lot of those maps. Wide appeal or not, some people like them. Also, there are plenty of popular new maps as well.

You could actually participate in the process instead of always talking about how the new map suck.

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:36 am

Wwoody123 wrote:Haha... I don't have the raw spreadsheet data or else I might.

hehehehe LOL you can't get out of that quickly Woody123....i've never used not having something as an excuse....

http://h1.ripway.com/cairnswk/ZRATINGS230308.xls

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:37 am

edbeard wrote:
hulmey wrote:its quite sad that alot of new maps are right at the bottom of the chart
I like a lot of those maps. Wide appeal or not, some people like them. Also, there are plenty of popular new maps as well.

You could actually participate in the process instead of always talking about how the new map suck.

go ed...

hulmey · Post by **hulmey** » Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:15 am

edbeard wrote:
hulmey wrote:its quite sad that alot of new maps are right at the bottom of the chart
I like a lot of those maps. Wide appeal or not, some people like them. Also, there are plenty of popular new maps as well.

You could actually participate in the process instead of always talking about how the new map suck.

Dear Ed,

i know me and you dotn see eye to eye on most things. Take a look at the games im playing. There are only 3 games, and they are all on NEW maps!! This post by you again shows how map makers are cut off from the rest of the CC community. Just take a look at all the posts poping up, about how confusing maps are. anyways this aint the place to debate such things!

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:00 am

nice work cairnswk

TY

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:03 am

gdeangel · Post by **gdeangel** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:04 pm

Wow... that's eye openning. Why would anyone play classic? I don't get it... but I see where this is going.

There is definitely unwieldy map proliferation. I can barely even find the maps I like to play on the "Start Game" screen anymore. What I suggest - rather than mothballing great maps like WWII Iwa Jima (visually and historically excellent, even if play can be tough) or VOTK (super complex bonus structure that actually works well) - is that the map selection area be subdivided by category... here's a few possibly suggestions, by no means have I completely thought this through:

1) Geographic Reproduction Maps (this would be your classics, 2.1, Italy, Spain, Carribean, etc. - probably most of the maps)
2) Historical Maps (e.g., Alexander, Mongol, Prohibition, Waterloo)
3) War maps (would overlap with historical maps)
4) Fanasy Realm Maps (e.g., Middle Earth, Seige!, Draknor, Space, Solar System, CCU...)
5) CC Games (chinese checkers, conquer man, crossword)
6) Castle Based Realms (a sub-category of Fantasy Realms: AoR, Feudal,...)

They should certainly keep a "show all" option, but a way to filter maps by category would be nice.

MAP MOVEMENT STATS 21 SEP 08 & MAP FOUNDRY LINKS

Re: MAP MOVEMENT STATS 6 APRIL 08 & MAP FOUNDRY LINKS

Re: MAP MOVEMENT STATS 6 APRIL 08 & MAP FOUNDRY LINKS