Moderator: Cartographers
No offense, but that really wasn't very helpful. What direction should I go in? What should I change? What do you want me to make look different?oaktown wrote:To begin with, if you live in the bay area but you're off the area of the old map, I feel sorry for you.![]()
But seriously, if you're going to make another San Francisco bar area map, you should go an entirely different direction with the graphics. The last thing we need is two maps of the same area that look identical.
I think what he's saying is that both the current SF map and this one use a satellite image as a background with some color layers on top. Try making this one NOT like that. The style is really up to you, but try using a different one than the style being used for the SF map, since the regions are so similar.Freyja wrote:No offense, but that really wasn't very helpful. What direction should I go in? What should I change? What do you want me to make look different?oaktown wrote:To begin with, if you live in the bay area but you're off the area of the old map, I feel sorry for you.![]()
But seriously, if you're going to make another San Francisco bar area map, you should go an entirely different direction with the graphics. The last thing we need is two maps of the same area that look identical.
Precisely my point. If looks as if somebody took the old bay area map and just made the area bigger - visually it's a knock-off of the old map. There are nearly 100 maps here at CC, and none use the same visual approach taken on johloh's San Francisco map - I suspect it's not a coincidence that your SF Bay map uses a satellite image with color overlays.ZeakCytho wrote:I think what he's saying is that both the current SF map and this one use a satellite image as a background with some color layers on top. Try making this one NOT like that. The style is really up to you, but try using a different one than the style being used for the SF map, since the regions are so similar.
you know you're jealous of the south bay and silicon valley. To call the other map a 'bay area' map is misleading because it leaves out quite a bit of what people consider the bay area. Which by the way includes everything from about Santa Rosa to Santa Cruz maybe eastwards to Modesto. So, the map does a good job, in my opinion, of at least capturing what the bay area really is.oaktown wrote:To begin with, if you live in the bay area but you're off the area of the old map, I feel sorry for you.![]()
I don't think this matters too much. There's precedent for at least developing two maps of about the same area. As long as graphics and gameplay take a different approach, it doesn't matter too much.Bones2484 wrote:While I can understand you wanting your city to be on a map, is it necessary to have another map that is so close to the San Francisco map? I realize you are including more cities, but none of them (that aren't included on San Fran map) are cities that anyone outside of those that live there care/know about.
