Moderator: Cartographers
oaktown wrote:To begin with, if you live in the bay area but you're off the area of the old map, I feel sorry for you.![]()
But seriously, if you're going to make another San Francisco bar area map, you should go an entirely different direction with the graphics. The last thing we need is two maps of the same area that look identical.
Freyja wrote:oaktown wrote:To begin with, if you live in the bay area but you're off the area of the old map, I feel sorry for you.![]()
But seriously, if you're going to make another San Francisco bar area map, you should go an entirely different direction with the graphics. The last thing we need is two maps of the same area that look identical.
No offense, but that really wasn't very helpful. What direction should I go in? What should I change? What do you want me to make look different?
ZeakCytho wrote:I think what he's saying is that both the current SF map and this one use a satellite image as a background with some color layers on top. Try making this one NOT like that. The style is really up to you, but try using a different one than the style being used for the SF map, since the regions are so similar.
oaktown wrote:To begin with, if you live in the bay area but you're off the area of the old map, I feel sorry for you.![]()
Bones2484 wrote:While I can understand you wanting your city to be on a map, is it necessary to have another map that is so close to the San Francisco map? I realize you are including more cities, but none of them (that aren't included on San Fran map) are cities that anyone outside of those that live there care/know about.
