b.k. barunt wrote:Well, a month ago i was in the Louisiana backwoods, which has somewhat less internet than a bomb shelter. Has the governor of Illinois been under indictment for a month? Same question though, if it's not too hard for you, what's the difference between what he did and what Ford and Bush did?
Honibaz
Technically, for those of us in Illinois, we knew about his corruptness even before his election. Hardly anyone I've ever talked to wanted him for our governer. If you're wondering why he was voted in, the other candidate was Judy Barr Topinka, who was an even worse option. At least as far as corruption goes. And yes, this investigation has been public for about a month. He lost his governorship like 3 weeks ago. Blago claims to have done nothing wrong, and that he's been set up.
Why would he be set up you ask? So that he could be replaced by Pat Quinn
who is for raising IL state income tax 50%, cigarette tax $1, and other taxes like property tax. All of which Blago was fighting hard to stop appearantly. Too late though, the taxes have already been raised.
And as far as Ford and Bush, I dunno. I think that you'd have to be more specific. Are you talking about supreme court, cabinate, or general government appointees? Perhaps it really is a set-up. Or the difference is the fact that he was caught saying that he wanted $$$ for the job.
But Blago is on tape saying that he isn't just going to give the senate seat away because it's too valuable. In fact his appointee has admitted to being asked to help raise campaign funds for Blago.
Then there's also the case of giving high paying government jobs to his family, and then raising the pay. Trying to take funding away from a childrens hospital that refused to donate money to his campaign, and trying to use his position to get his wife a high paying charity job. He's got an uphill battle let me tell ya.