Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

What do you think about Bush( the 2nd).

 
Total votes: 0

JJM
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:49 pm
Gender: Male
Location: North Dakota

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by JJM »

oaktown wrote:
JJM wrote:Lack of Intellegences around the world belived they had weapons of mass destruction.
Fixed. ;)
You think I was making that up?
User avatar
captain.crazy
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by captain.crazy »

JJM wrote:Intellegences around the world belived they had weapons of mass destruction.
Actually, the fact that "other intelligences" around the world did NOT believe that there were weapons of mass destruction is what lead the US to unilaterally attack Iraq. We went in there alone, and it wasn't until after the war initiative was complete that we gained peace keeping support from other countries in the nation building effort. Sorry, but you are just wrong on this. He was a shitty president.
wake up. This is the end game.

Join our conspiracy clan!
JJM
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:49 pm
Gender: Male
Location: North Dakota

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by JJM »

captain.crazy wrote:
JJM wrote:Intellegences around the world belived they had weapons of mass destruction.
Actually, the fact that "other intelligences" around the world did NOT believe that there were weapons of mass destruction is what lead the US to unilaterally attack Iraq. We went in there alone, and it wasn't until after the war initiative was complete that we gained peace keeping support from other countries in the nation building effort. Sorry, but you are just wrong on this. He was a shitty president.
He freed millions from terrerisim. You can't tell me that that didn't matter.
User avatar
StiffMittens
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 11:25 am

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by StiffMittens »

JJM wrote:Bush did not Intensionally lie.
Here's documentation of 55 lies George W. Bush told with respect to Iraq and WMDs:

http://oversight.house.gov/IraqOnTheRec ... ge+W.+Bush
Image
User avatar
InkL0sed
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Gender: Male
Location: underwater
Contact:

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by InkL0sed »

JJM, what do you have to say about this thread:

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... =8&t=86146

Saving millions from terrorism my ass. How in the world does a President who had 9/11 happen on his watch get credit for keeping us safe?
JJM
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:49 pm
Gender: Male
Location: North Dakota

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by JJM »

StiffMittens wrote:
JJM wrote:Bush did not Intensionally lie.
Here's documentation of 55 lies George W. Bush told with respect to Iraq and WMDs:

http://oversight.house.gov/IraqOnTheRec ... ge+W.+Bush
Ok ask me about anyone of those and I will give you an answer.
User avatar
captain.crazy
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by captain.crazy »

JJM wrote:
captain.crazy wrote:
JJM wrote:Intellegences around the world belived they had weapons of mass destruction.
Actually, the fact that "other intelligences" around the world did NOT believe that there were weapons of mass destruction is what lead the US to unilaterally attack Iraq. We went in there alone, and it wasn't until after the war initiative was complete that we gained peace keeping support from other countries in the nation building effort. Sorry, but you are just wrong on this. He was a shitty president.
He freed millions from terrerisim. You can't tell me that that didn't matter.
Not sure what terrerisim is, but those that perpetrated 9-11 were not in Iraq. He had no WMD's and so the argument that WMD's were going to be used there to terrorize people are bunk. In fact, over half a million civilian deaths are blamed for our invasion in Iraq, so in reality, he made US responsible for those deaths. Operation Iraqi Freedom is a funny name for people that didn't even asked to be free, nor were they interested in fighting for their own freedom.

No, There were ulterior motives for getting us into Iraq. Since no good has come from It that I can see, I am left with the impression that the Illuminati simply wanted instability in the region to foster terrorist agendas, to further the stripping of American Liberties which are necessary for a global government.
wake up. This is the end game.

Join our conspiracy clan!
JJM
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:49 pm
Gender: Male
Location: North Dakota

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by JJM »

captain.crazy wrote:
JJM wrote:
captain.crazy wrote:
JJM wrote:Intellegences around the world belived they had weapons of mass destruction.
Actually, the fact that "other intelligences" around the world did NOT believe that there were weapons of mass destruction is what lead the US to unilaterally attack Iraq. We went in there alone, and it wasn't until after the war initiative was complete that we gained peace keeping support from other countries in the nation building effort. Sorry, but you are just wrong on this. He was a shitty president.
He freed millions from terrerisim. You can't tell me that that didn't matter.
Not sure what terrerisim is, but those that perpetrated 9-11 were not in Iraq. He had no WMD's and so the argument that WMD's were going to be used there to terrorize people are bunk. In fact, over half a million civilian deaths are blamed for our invasion in Iraq, so in reality, he made US responsible for those deaths. Operation Iraqi Freedom is a funny name for people that didn't even asked to be free, nor were they interested in fighting for their own freedom.

No, There were ulterior motives for getting us into Iraq. Since no good has come from It that I can see, I am left with the impression that the Illuminati simply wanted instability in the region to foster terrorist agendas, to further the stripping of American Liberties which are necessary for a global government.
You mean you have never heard of Terrerism.
User avatar
captain.crazy
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by captain.crazy »

JJM wrote:
captain.crazy wrote:
JJM wrote:
captain.crazy wrote:
JJM wrote:Intellegences around the world belived they had weapons of mass destruction.
Actually, the fact that "other intelligences" around the world did NOT believe that there were weapons of mass destruction is what lead the US to unilaterally attack Iraq. We went in there alone, and it wasn't until after the war initiative was complete that we gained peace keeping support from other countries in the nation building effort. Sorry, but you are just wrong on this. He was a shitty president.
He freed millions from terrerisim. You can't tell me that that didn't matter.
Not sure what terrerisim is, but those that perpetrated 9-11 were not in Iraq. He had no WMD's and so the argument that WMD's were going to be used there to terrorize people are bunk. In fact, over half a million civilian deaths are blamed for our invasion in Iraq, so in reality, he made US responsible for those deaths. Operation Iraqi Freedom is a funny name for people that didn't even asked to be free, nor were they interested in fighting for their own freedom.

No, There were ulterior motives for getting us into Iraq. Since no good has come from It that I can see, I am left with the impression that the Illuminati simply wanted instability in the region to foster terrorist agendas, to further the stripping of American Liberties which are necessary for a global government.
You mean you have never heard of Terrerism.
I'm sorry... I am making fun of your misspelling of the word terrorism...
wake up. This is the end game.

Join our conspiracy clan!
JJM
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:49 pm
Gender: Male
Location: North Dakota

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by JJM »

Ok.
User avatar
StiffMittens
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 11:25 am

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by StiffMittens »

JJM wrote:
StiffMittens wrote:
JJM wrote:Bush did not Intensionally lie.
Here's documentation of 55 lies George W. Bush told with respect to Iraq and WMDs:

http://oversight.house.gov/IraqOnTheRec ... ge+W.+Bush
Ok ask me about anyone of those and I will give you an answer.
No, you read them and then provide a rebuttal for each of the report's findings. Be sure to include sources and documentation to back up your statements, and check your spelling before submitting your answers. You have one hour to complete the examination. Begin.
Image
JJM
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:49 pm
Gender: Male
Location: North Dakota

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by JJM »

StiffMittens wrote:
JJM wrote:
StiffMittens wrote:
JJM wrote:Bush did not Intensionally lie.
Here's documentation of 55 lies George W. Bush told with respect to Iraq and WMDs:

http://oversight.house.gov/IraqOnTheRec ... ge+W.+Bush
Ok ask me about anyone of those and I will give you an answer.
No, you read them and then provide a rebuttal for each of the report's findings. Be sure to include sources and documentation to back up your statements, and check your spelling before submitting your answers. You have one hour to complete the examination. Begin.
:roll:
EvilPurpleMonkey
Posts: 492
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 6:48 pm

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by EvilPurpleMonkey »

I think Bush was an ok person, and had good intentions.

He was just quite incompetent, rather weak, and surrouded by machiavellian's with there stock portfolio's best interests at heart.

To be fair though, it WAS the American people who elected him, and even when you take into account all the ireggularities, close to 49% of Americans did support him both times.
mpjh
Posts: 6714
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:32 am
Location: gone

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by mpjh »

JJM wrote:
captain.crazy wrote:
JJM wrote:
captain.crazy wrote:I believe that he never won an election, that the electronic results were tampered with. I also believe that we were destined to go to war with Iraq the moment that he was sworn in, and that 9-11 was an inside job that was used to fuel tyrannical abuses of our liberties with the patriot act, and was used as a footing to go to war in Iraq, compounded with a lot of trumped up lies about WMD's.
Thats all a bunch of lies. I garrente it.
If only you could spell guarantee. But seriously, how can you disprove my allegations?
It was Collin Peterson who lied to Bush. Bush did not intensionaly lie. He ended up fireing Peterson to.

I just mixed up a new batch of kool-aide for you.
User avatar
captain.crazy
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by captain.crazy »

EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:I think Bush was an ok person, and had good intentions.

He was just quite incompetent, rather weak, and surrouded by machiavellian's with there stock portfolio's best interests at heart.

To be fair though, it WAS the American people who elected him, and even when you take into account all the ireggularities, close to 49% of Americans did support him both times.
I do not accept that he ever won an election. Broad evidence exists that there was wide spread tampering with electronic voting methods.
wake up. This is the end game.

Join our conspiracy clan!
EvilPurpleMonkey
Posts: 492
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 6:48 pm

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by EvilPurpleMonkey »

captain.crazy wrote:
EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:I think Bush was an ok person, and had good intentions.

He was just quite incompetent, rather weak, and surrouded by machiavellian's with there stock portfolio's best interests at heart.

To be fair though, it WAS the American people who elected him, and even when you take into account all the ireggularities, close to 49% of Americans did support him both times.
I do not accept that he ever won an election. Broad evidence exists that there was wide spread tampering with electronic voting methods.
There were significant ireggularities in both elections, but over all, they only accounted for a two percent increase in Bush's support. 49% of the US did vote for him, and it should be noted that he may not even have known or approved of such actions. He was never actually shown to be involved. It was mostly Jeb, the company that made the electronic voting machines, and a lot of lower level officials tampering with votes that caused it.
User avatar
captain.crazy
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by captain.crazy »

EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:
captain.crazy wrote:
EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:I think Bush was an ok person, and had good intentions.

He was just quite incompetent, rather weak, and surrouded by machiavellian's with there stock portfolio's best interests at heart.

To be fair though, it WAS the American people who elected him, and even when you take into account all the ireggularities, close to 49% of Americans did support him both times.
I do not accept that he ever won an election. Broad evidence exists that there was wide spread tampering with electronic voting methods.
There were significant ireggularities in both elections, but over all, they only accounted for a two percent increase in Bush's support. 49% of the US did vote for him, and it should be noted that he may not even have known or approved of such actions. He was never actually shown to be involved. It was mostly Jeb, the company that made the electronic voting machines, and a lot of lower level officials tampering with votes that caused it.
Which, to me, validates claims that he was fraudulently elected. It doesn't matter to me that he was personally involved or not, as I believe that he was really not "personally involved" with his presidency, as I have stated, he was just a puppet.
wake up. This is the end game.

Join our conspiracy clan!
User avatar
F1fth
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:15 am
Gender: Male

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by F1fth »

captain.crazy wrote:Another treasonous dog that deserves the gallows pole. He was the pungent precursor to the disaster that we have in office now. I can't wait to see what comes next.
captain.crazy wrote:I believe that he never won an election, that the electronic results were tampered with. I also believe that we were destined to go to war with Iraq the moment that he was sworn in, and that 9-11 was an inside job that was used to fuel tyrannical abuses of our liberties with the patriot act, and was used as a footing to go to war in Iraq, compounded with a lot of trumped up lies about WMD's.
Whoa, whoa, whoa. You believe that Bush, or at least people under him, perpetrated one of the largest attacks on American soil, one which killed thousands of innocent people in his own country, and which would be one of the most goddamn treasonous things I can think of? And you know that he took away some rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights with the Patriot Act (such as habeus corpus, a VERY important right)?

And you still think Obama is almost as bad as that!? HOW?

(Irrelevant to my point is that I don't believe that it was the American government was the cause of the 9/11 attacks, but that's another discussion, and one I'm not particularly interested in given that it's been had so many times in this forum).
Last edited by F1fth on Sun May 10, 2009 2:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
<>---------------------------<>
......Come play CC Mafia,
.....where happiness lies
<>----------[Link]----------<>

REMEMBER NORSE // REMEMBER DANCING MUSTARD
User avatar
captain.crazy
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by captain.crazy »

F1fth wrote:
captain.crazy wrote:Another treasonous dog that deserves the gallows pole. He was the pungent precursor to the disaster that we have in office now. I can't wait to see what comes next.
captain.crazy wrote:I believe that he never won an election, that the electronic results were tampered with. I also believe that we were destined to go to war with Iraq the moment that he was sworn in, and that 9-11 was an inside job that was used to fuel tyrannical abuses of our liberties with the patriot act, and was used as a footing to go to war in Iraq, compounded with a lot of trumped up lies about WMD's.
Whoa, whoa, whoa. You believe that Bush, or at least people under him, perpetrated one of the largest attacks on American soil, one which killed thousands of innocent people in his own country, and which would one of the most goddamn treasonous things I can think of? And you know that he took away some rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights with the Patriot Act (such as habeus corpus, a VERY important right)?

And you still think Obama is almost as bad as that!? HOW?

(Irrelevant to my point is that I don't believe that it was the American government was the cause of the 9/11 attacks, but that's another discussion, and one I'm not particularly interested in given that it's been had so many times in this forum).
I believe it because we actually have yet to see what Obama is going to do to this country. 9-11 was 8 months into into Bush's presidency. My gut tells me that Obama will have his own 9-11 to contend with. I believe that it will be of a much larger scale.

To further this, he is breaking the bank of our country with his ridiculous spending, which will destroy our economy and put hundreds of millions of people in jeopardy. Be patient, the carnage will begin soon. Get out of your cities asap. You will not want to be in a city when they are all reduced to martial law similar to the fiasco that was New Orleans in the wake of Katrina.
wake up. This is the end game.

Join our conspiracy clan!
User avatar
F1fth
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:15 am
Gender: Male

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by F1fth »

captain.crazy wrote:
F1fth wrote:
captain.crazy wrote:Another treasonous dog that deserves the gallows pole. He was the pungent precursor to the disaster that we have in office now. I can't wait to see what comes next.
captain.crazy wrote:I believe that he never won an election, that the electronic results were tampered with. I also believe that we were destined to go to war with Iraq the moment that he was sworn in, and that 9-11 was an inside job that was used to fuel tyrannical abuses of our liberties with the patriot act, and was used as a footing to go to war in Iraq, compounded with a lot of trumped up lies about WMD's.
Whoa, whoa, whoa. You believe that Bush, or at least people under him, perpetrated one of the largest attacks on American soil, one which killed thousands of innocent people in his own country, and which would one of the most goddamn treasonous things I can think of? And you know that he took away some rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights with the Patriot Act (such as habeus corpus, a VERY important right)?

And you still think Obama is almost as bad as that!? HOW?

(Irrelevant to my point is that I don't believe that it was the American government was the cause of the 9/11 attacks, but that's another discussion, and one I'm not particularly interested in given that it's been had so many times in this forum).
I believe it because we actually have yet to see what Obama is going to do to this country. 9-11 was 8 months into into Bush's presidency. My gut tells me that Obama will have his own 9-11 to contend with. I believe that it will be of a much larger scale.

To further this, he is breaking the bank of our country with his ridiculous spending, which will destroy our economy and put hundreds of millions of people in jeopardy. Be patient, the carnage will begin soon. Get out of your cities asap. You will not want to be in a city when they are all reduced to martial law similar to the fiasco that was New Orleans in the wake of Katrina.
But it's still just speculation, isn't it? Well, besides the economy stuffs.
<>---------------------------<>
......Come play CC Mafia,
.....where happiness lies
<>----------[Link]----------<>

REMEMBER NORSE // REMEMBER DANCING MUSTARD
neanderpaul14
Posts: 1216
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:52 pm
Location: "Always mystify, mislead and surprise the enemy if possible." - Thomas J. Jackson

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by neanderpaul14 »

George W. is a complete and utter moron. My cat has a higher I.Q. than him.
Image
High score: 2724
/#163 on scoreboard/COLONEL
JJM
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:49 pm
Gender: Male
Location: North Dakota

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by JJM »

neanderpaul14 wrote:George W. is a complete and utter moron. My cat has a higher I.Q. than him.
Bush is smarter than people give him credit for.
neanderpaul14
Posts: 1216
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:52 pm
Location: "Always mystify, mislead and surprise the enemy if possible." - Thomas J. Jackson

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by neanderpaul14 »

JJM wrote:
neanderpaul14 wrote:George W. is a complete and utter moron. My cat has a higher I.Q. than him.
Bush is smarter than people give him credit for.
No he wasn't. Every time he stood up to speak in public his speech writers could be seen cringing in the background wondering what he was going to screw up this time.
Image
High score: 2724
/#163 on scoreboard/COLONEL
User avatar
InkL0sed
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Gender: Male
Location: underwater
Contact:

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by InkL0sed »

InkL0sed wrote:JJM, what do you have to say about this thread:

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... =8&t=86146

Saving millions from terrorism my ass. How in the world does a President who had 9/11 happen on his watch get credit for keeping us safe?
And, of course, no response. Because what Bush did here was indefensible.
JJM
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:49 pm
Gender: Male
Location: North Dakota

Re: Opinions on Bush(the 2nd).

Post by JJM »

InkL0sed wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:JJM, what do you have to say about this thread:

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... =8&t=86146

Saving millions from terrorism my ass. How in the world does a President who had 9/11 happen on his watch get credit for keeping us safe?
And, of course, no response. Because what Bush did here was indefensible.
I didn't hear them mention any of the good things that came out of the decission like how many people were freed from Terrorism.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”