You think I was making that up?oaktown wrote:Fixed.JJM wrote:Lack of Intellegences around the world belived they had weapons of mass destruction.
Moderator: Community Team
You think I was making that up?oaktown wrote:Fixed.JJM wrote:Lack of Intellegences around the world belived they had weapons of mass destruction.
Actually, the fact that "other intelligences" around the world did NOT believe that there were weapons of mass destruction is what lead the US to unilaterally attack Iraq. We went in there alone, and it wasn't until after the war initiative was complete that we gained peace keeping support from other countries in the nation building effort. Sorry, but you are just wrong on this. He was a shitty president.JJM wrote:Intellegences around the world belived they had weapons of mass destruction.
He freed millions from terrerisim. You can't tell me that that didn't matter.captain.crazy wrote:Actually, the fact that "other intelligences" around the world did NOT believe that there were weapons of mass destruction is what lead the US to unilaterally attack Iraq. We went in there alone, and it wasn't until after the war initiative was complete that we gained peace keeping support from other countries in the nation building effort. Sorry, but you are just wrong on this. He was a shitty president.JJM wrote:Intellegences around the world belived they had weapons of mass destruction.
Here's documentation of 55 lies George W. Bush told with respect to Iraq and WMDs:JJM wrote:Bush did not Intensionally lie.

Ok ask me about anyone of those and I will give you an answer.StiffMittens wrote:Here's documentation of 55 lies George W. Bush told with respect to Iraq and WMDs:JJM wrote:Bush did not Intensionally lie.
http://oversight.house.gov/IraqOnTheRec ... ge+W.+Bush
Not sure what terrerisim is, but those that perpetrated 9-11 were not in Iraq. He had no WMD's and so the argument that WMD's were going to be used there to terrorize people are bunk. In fact, over half a million civilian deaths are blamed for our invasion in Iraq, so in reality, he made US responsible for those deaths. Operation Iraqi Freedom is a funny name for people that didn't even asked to be free, nor were they interested in fighting for their own freedom.JJM wrote:He freed millions from terrerisim. You can't tell me that that didn't matter.captain.crazy wrote:Actually, the fact that "other intelligences" around the world did NOT believe that there were weapons of mass destruction is what lead the US to unilaterally attack Iraq. We went in there alone, and it wasn't until after the war initiative was complete that we gained peace keeping support from other countries in the nation building effort. Sorry, but you are just wrong on this. He was a shitty president.JJM wrote:Intellegences around the world belived they had weapons of mass destruction.
You mean you have never heard of Terrerism.captain.crazy wrote:Not sure what terrerisim is, but those that perpetrated 9-11 were not in Iraq. He had no WMD's and so the argument that WMD's were going to be used there to terrorize people are bunk. In fact, over half a million civilian deaths are blamed for our invasion in Iraq, so in reality, he made US responsible for those deaths. Operation Iraqi Freedom is a funny name for people that didn't even asked to be free, nor were they interested in fighting for their own freedom.JJM wrote:He freed millions from terrerisim. You can't tell me that that didn't matter.captain.crazy wrote:Actually, the fact that "other intelligences" around the world did NOT believe that there were weapons of mass destruction is what lead the US to unilaterally attack Iraq. We went in there alone, and it wasn't until after the war initiative was complete that we gained peace keeping support from other countries in the nation building effort. Sorry, but you are just wrong on this. He was a shitty president.JJM wrote:Intellegences around the world belived they had weapons of mass destruction.
No, There were ulterior motives for getting us into Iraq. Since no good has come from It that I can see, I am left with the impression that the Illuminati simply wanted instability in the region to foster terrorist agendas, to further the stripping of American Liberties which are necessary for a global government.
I'm sorry... I am making fun of your misspelling of the word terrorism...JJM wrote:You mean you have never heard of Terrerism.captain.crazy wrote:Not sure what terrerisim is, but those that perpetrated 9-11 were not in Iraq. He had no WMD's and so the argument that WMD's were going to be used there to terrorize people are bunk. In fact, over half a million civilian deaths are blamed for our invasion in Iraq, so in reality, he made US responsible for those deaths. Operation Iraqi Freedom is a funny name for people that didn't even asked to be free, nor were they interested in fighting for their own freedom.JJM wrote:He freed millions from terrerisim. You can't tell me that that didn't matter.captain.crazy wrote:Actually, the fact that "other intelligences" around the world did NOT believe that there were weapons of mass destruction is what lead the US to unilaterally attack Iraq. We went in there alone, and it wasn't until after the war initiative was complete that we gained peace keeping support from other countries in the nation building effort. Sorry, but you are just wrong on this. He was a shitty president.JJM wrote:Intellegences around the world belived they had weapons of mass destruction.
No, There were ulterior motives for getting us into Iraq. Since no good has come from It that I can see, I am left with the impression that the Illuminati simply wanted instability in the region to foster terrorist agendas, to further the stripping of American Liberties which are necessary for a global government.
No, you read them and then provide a rebuttal for each of the report's findings. Be sure to include sources and documentation to back up your statements, and check your spelling before submitting your answers. You have one hour to complete the examination. Begin.JJM wrote:Ok ask me about anyone of those and I will give you an answer.StiffMittens wrote:Here's documentation of 55 lies George W. Bush told with respect to Iraq and WMDs:JJM wrote:Bush did not Intensionally lie.
http://oversight.house.gov/IraqOnTheRec ... ge+W.+Bush

StiffMittens wrote:No, you read them and then provide a rebuttal for each of the report's findings. Be sure to include sources and documentation to back up your statements, and check your spelling before submitting your answers. You have one hour to complete the examination. Begin.JJM wrote:Ok ask me about anyone of those and I will give you an answer.StiffMittens wrote:Here's documentation of 55 lies George W. Bush told with respect to Iraq and WMDs:JJM wrote:Bush did not Intensionally lie.
http://oversight.house.gov/IraqOnTheRec ... ge+W.+Bush
JJM wrote:It was Collin Peterson who lied to Bush. Bush did not intensionaly lie. He ended up fireing Peterson to.captain.crazy wrote:If only you could spell guarantee. But seriously, how can you disprove my allegations?JJM wrote:Thats all a bunch of lies. I garrente it.captain.crazy wrote:I believe that he never won an election, that the electronic results were tampered with. I also believe that we were destined to go to war with Iraq the moment that he was sworn in, and that 9-11 was an inside job that was used to fuel tyrannical abuses of our liberties with the patriot act, and was used as a footing to go to war in Iraq, compounded with a lot of trumped up lies about WMD's.
I do not accept that he ever won an election. Broad evidence exists that there was wide spread tampering with electronic voting methods.EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:I think Bush was an ok person, and had good intentions.
He was just quite incompetent, rather weak, and surrouded by machiavellian's with there stock portfolio's best interests at heart.
To be fair though, it WAS the American people who elected him, and even when you take into account all the ireggularities, close to 49% of Americans did support him both times.
There were significant ireggularities in both elections, but over all, they only accounted for a two percent increase in Bush's support. 49% of the US did vote for him, and it should be noted that he may not even have known or approved of such actions. He was never actually shown to be involved. It was mostly Jeb, the company that made the electronic voting machines, and a lot of lower level officials tampering with votes that caused it.captain.crazy wrote:I do not accept that he ever won an election. Broad evidence exists that there was wide spread tampering with electronic voting methods.EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:I think Bush was an ok person, and had good intentions.
He was just quite incompetent, rather weak, and surrouded by machiavellian's with there stock portfolio's best interests at heart.
To be fair though, it WAS the American people who elected him, and even when you take into account all the ireggularities, close to 49% of Americans did support him both times.
Which, to me, validates claims that he was fraudulently elected. It doesn't matter to me that he was personally involved or not, as I believe that he was really not "personally involved" with his presidency, as I have stated, he was just a puppet.EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:There were significant ireggularities in both elections, but over all, they only accounted for a two percent increase in Bush's support. 49% of the US did vote for him, and it should be noted that he may not even have known or approved of such actions. He was never actually shown to be involved. It was mostly Jeb, the company that made the electronic voting machines, and a lot of lower level officials tampering with votes that caused it.captain.crazy wrote:I do not accept that he ever won an election. Broad evidence exists that there was wide spread tampering with electronic voting methods.EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:I think Bush was an ok person, and had good intentions.
He was just quite incompetent, rather weak, and surrouded by machiavellian's with there stock portfolio's best interests at heart.
To be fair though, it WAS the American people who elected him, and even when you take into account all the ireggularities, close to 49% of Americans did support him both times.
captain.crazy wrote:Another treasonous dog that deserves the gallows pole. He was the pungent precursor to the disaster that we have in office now. I can't wait to see what comes next.
Whoa, whoa, whoa. You believe that Bush, or at least people under him, perpetrated one of the largest attacks on American soil, one which killed thousands of innocent people in his own country, and which would be one of the most goddamn treasonous things I can think of? And you know that he took away some rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights with the Patriot Act (such as habeus corpus, a VERY important right)?captain.crazy wrote:I believe that he never won an election, that the electronic results were tampered with. I also believe that we were destined to go to war with Iraq the moment that he was sworn in, and that 9-11 was an inside job that was used to fuel tyrannical abuses of our liberties with the patriot act, and was used as a footing to go to war in Iraq, compounded with a lot of trumped up lies about WMD's.
I believe it because we actually have yet to see what Obama is going to do to this country. 9-11 was 8 months into into Bush's presidency. My gut tells me that Obama will have his own 9-11 to contend with. I believe that it will be of a much larger scale.F1fth wrote:captain.crazy wrote:Another treasonous dog that deserves the gallows pole. He was the pungent precursor to the disaster that we have in office now. I can't wait to see what comes next.Whoa, whoa, whoa. You believe that Bush, or at least people under him, perpetrated one of the largest attacks on American soil, one which killed thousands of innocent people in his own country, and which would one of the most goddamn treasonous things I can think of? And you know that he took away some rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights with the Patriot Act (such as habeus corpus, a VERY important right)?captain.crazy wrote:I believe that he never won an election, that the electronic results were tampered with. I also believe that we were destined to go to war with Iraq the moment that he was sworn in, and that 9-11 was an inside job that was used to fuel tyrannical abuses of our liberties with the patriot act, and was used as a footing to go to war in Iraq, compounded with a lot of trumped up lies about WMD's.
And you still think Obama is almost as bad as that!? HOW?
(Irrelevant to my point is that I don't believe that it was the American government was the cause of the 9/11 attacks, but that's another discussion, and one I'm not particularly interested in given that it's been had so many times in this forum).
But it's still just speculation, isn't it? Well, besides the economy stuffs.captain.crazy wrote:I believe it because we actually have yet to see what Obama is going to do to this country. 9-11 was 8 months into into Bush's presidency. My gut tells me that Obama will have his own 9-11 to contend with. I believe that it will be of a much larger scale.F1fth wrote:captain.crazy wrote:Another treasonous dog that deserves the gallows pole. He was the pungent precursor to the disaster that we have in office now. I can't wait to see what comes next.Whoa, whoa, whoa. You believe that Bush, or at least people under him, perpetrated one of the largest attacks on American soil, one which killed thousands of innocent people in his own country, and which would one of the most goddamn treasonous things I can think of? And you know that he took away some rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights with the Patriot Act (such as habeus corpus, a VERY important right)?captain.crazy wrote:I believe that he never won an election, that the electronic results were tampered with. I also believe that we were destined to go to war with Iraq the moment that he was sworn in, and that 9-11 was an inside job that was used to fuel tyrannical abuses of our liberties with the patriot act, and was used as a footing to go to war in Iraq, compounded with a lot of trumped up lies about WMD's.
And you still think Obama is almost as bad as that!? HOW?
(Irrelevant to my point is that I don't believe that it was the American government was the cause of the 9/11 attacks, but that's another discussion, and one I'm not particularly interested in given that it's been had so many times in this forum).
To further this, he is breaking the bank of our country with his ridiculous spending, which will destroy our economy and put hundreds of millions of people in jeopardy. Be patient, the carnage will begin soon. Get out of your cities asap. You will not want to be in a city when they are all reduced to martial law similar to the fiasco that was New Orleans in the wake of Katrina.

Bush is smarter than people give him credit for.neanderpaul14 wrote:George W. is a complete and utter moron. My cat has a higher I.Q. than him.
No he wasn't. Every time he stood up to speak in public his speech writers could be seen cringing in the background wondering what he was going to screw up this time.JJM wrote:Bush is smarter than people give him credit for.neanderpaul14 wrote:George W. is a complete and utter moron. My cat has a higher I.Q. than him.

And, of course, no response. Because what Bush did here was indefensible.InkL0sed wrote:JJM, what do you have to say about this thread:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... =8&t=86146
Saving millions from terrorism my ass. How in the world does a President who had 9/11 happen on his watch get credit for keeping us safe?
I didn't hear them mention any of the good things that came out of the decission like how many people were freed from Terrorism.InkL0sed wrote:And, of course, no response. Because what Bush did here was indefensible.InkL0sed wrote:JJM, what do you have to say about this thread:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... =8&t=86146
Saving millions from terrorism my ass. How in the world does a President who had 9/11 happen on his watch get credit for keeping us safe?