Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team


dezzy26 wrote:sorry yes the game number doesnt need to be there ill remove that and correct the form a little more
the rest of the report is very serious the and is in no way meant to be vindictive


Snowgun wrote: What do you do when you play cards? Take out all the spades?

drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
*sigh*dezzy26 wrote:http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=coon

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coondezzy26 wrote:http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=coon
Raccoons HATE it when you call them coons.alex951 wrote: When I first read coon I thought about a racoon but I certainly didn't think that it was a racial slur.




Don't know if you saw how this report was originally filed: Linked to a game with no chat that the suspect in question was winning, all sorts of formatting errors, other accusations such as multi, PM abuse, secret diplomacy (2 player game? WTF?).king sam wrote:coon used in the context of what your suggesting can be racial in form. However their is nothing present to back up that this was the intention of this username so this case will be Cleared.
To be clear on what a spurious report is, cause it was mentioned I have listed an explanation below.
Yes its one that wastes our time, but that statement is geared towards claims that are:Obviously there is more that could go in the list above, but I think you get the hint. Although a little research would have shown that in the past we don't usually resort to punishment in usernames that are like this one (as mentioned "Third Reich") the complainant had a viable question.
- completely ridiculous and hold no merit to what the accusation is
- created for spite or vindication because of an altercation of some sort
- continually created on a user in hopes that eventually you will get them for a violation
- continually created by a user that lack evidence "this player is too good" explanation
- created that have the sole intention of flaming a user or his gameplay
KS

what do you think?firth4eva wrote:So we can call people a coon without punishment now?
Cause I have to say it again. NO. you use that word in the context or near the context that you are implying and you will receive punishmentking sam wrote:coon used in the context of what your suggesting can be racial in form. However their is nothing present to back up that this was the intention of this username so this case will be Cleared.
Although a little research would have shown that in the past we don't usually resort to punishment in usernames that are like this one (as mentioned "Third Reich") the complainant had a viable question.

I didn't see the initial post in which this occurred, nor did anyone quote it for later but even with all those errors unless it was completely obvious the form was made in lieu of trying to do anything to get the OP in trouble then it wouldn't have been considered spurious.Snowgun wrote: Don't know if you saw how this report was originally filed: Linked to a game with no chat that the suspect in question was winning, all sorts of formatting errors, other accusations such as multi, PM abuse, secret diplomacy (2 player game? WTF?).
That is why I called it a spurious report initially. However Dezzy fixed it correctly after my post.![]()
Oh, and firth is effin foed.
