targetman377 wrote:i saw crazy heart its a good movie not the best but good acting and plot
*sorry lone wolf there is no special effects.
I don't like movies just for special effects. I just think that a few movies have spectacular special effects.
but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.
To prove that effects can't make a movie all on their own, you just have to see the final Indiana Jones movie...
targetman377 wrote:i saw crazy heart its a good movie not the best but good acting and plot
*sorry lone wolf there is no special effects.
I don't like movies just for special effects. I just think that a few movies have spectacular special effects.
but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.
To prove that effects can't make a movie all on their own, you just have to see the final Indiana Jones movie...
Truthfully i didn't even find the special effects in that movie to be that great.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
I found myself thinking "Jeez, if they'd spent as much thought on the plot as the effects, it'd be watchable." The effects weren't innovative, but they were spectacular.
strike wolf wrote:
I don't like movies just for special effects. I just think that a few movies have spectacular special effects.
but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.
To prove that effects can't make a movie all on their own, you just have to see the final Indiana Jones movie...
Truthfully i didn't even find the special effects in that movie to be that great.
i would agee i did not like that movie at all like the first 3 but not that one
targetman377 wrote:well i hope by the 100th time they redo a plot there exctuion of said plot gets better! but who cares about that
Maybe the fact that even the best plots if poorly executed make poor movies?
example star wars. yes but shity plot exctued great is still a worse movie then a great plot exctued baddly
We're gonna have to disagree there. Execution of said plot is just as important as teh plot itself so:
bad plot + great execution=at best a decent movie
Great plot + poor execution=at best a decent movie.
Again you're beef with Star Wars is only the acting. Bad acting alone should not make a movie's quality go down as much as you think it should. The actual plot and execution was good the acting subpar.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:
I don't like movies just for special effects. I just think that a few movies have spectacular special effects.
but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.
To prove that effects can't make a movie all on their own, you just have to see the final Indiana Jones movie...
Truthfully i didn't even find the special effects in that movie to be that great.
It's like a lot of action movies. Turn off your higher brain functions and you'll find it enjoyable...
i would agee i did not like that movie at all like the first 3 but not that one
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
targetman377 wrote:well i hope by the 100th time they redo a plot there exctuion of said plot gets better! but who cares about that
Maybe the fact that even the best plots if poorly executed make poor movies?
example star wars. yes but shity plot exctued great is still a worse movie then a great plot exctued baddly
We're gonna have to disagree there. Execution of said plot is just as important as teh plot itself so:
bad plot + great execution=at best a decent movie
Great plot + poor execution=at best a decent movie.
Again you're beef with Star Wars is only the acting. Bad acting alone should not make a movie's quality go down as much as you think it should. The actual plot and execution was good the acting subpar.
George locus is a horrible director his execution of the plot was crappy. it really did suck seeing how writing and acting go in to the execution of the plot. they are interconnected
targetman377 wrote:
To prove that effects can't make a movie all on their own, you just have to see the final Indiana Jones movie...
Truthfully i didn't even find the special effects in that movie to be that great.
It's like a lot of action movies. Turn off your higher brain functions and you'll find it enjoyable...
i would agee i did not like that movie at all like the first 3 but not that one
i find doing that is what makes our society so dumb. there should be standerders
targetman377 wrote:i saw crazy heart its a good movie not the best but good acting and plot
*sorry lone wolf there is no special effects.
I don't like movies just for special effects. I just think that a few movies have spectacular special effects.
but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.
He is to intelEegenT for youre speshal affeks.
[This signature saved as part of ancient history, dating back to 2010] <- img courtesy of Zoebear1
targetman377 wrote:i saw crazy heart its a good movie not the best but good acting and plot
*sorry lone wolf there is no special effects.
I don't like movies just for special effects. I just think that a few movies have spectacular special effects.
but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.
He is to intelEegenT for youre speshal affeks.
last time i checked the ability to spell is not a good measure of someone's intelligence. but if you feel that it is i am very sorry for you.
Last edited by targetman377 on Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
targetman377 wrote:well i hope by the 100th time they redo a plot there exctuion of said plot gets better! but who cares about that
Maybe the fact that even the best plots if poorly executed make poor movies?
example star wars. yes but shity plot exctued great is still a worse movie then a great plot exctued baddly
We're gonna have to disagree there. Execution of said plot is just as important as teh plot itself so:
bad plot + great execution=at best a decent movie
Great plot + poor execution=at best a decent movie.
Again you're beef with Star Wars is only the acting. Bad acting alone should not make a movie's quality go down as much as you think it should. The actual plot and execution was good the acting subpar.
George locus is a horrible director his execution of the plot was crappy. it really did suck seeing how writing and acting go in to the execution of the plot. they are interconnected
Oh, I thought you were talking about the original Star Wars by George LUCAS.
[This signature saved as part of ancient history, dating back to 2010] <- img courtesy of Zoebear1
targetman377 wrote:i saw crazy heart its a good movie not the best but good acting and plot
*sorry lone wolf there is no special effects.
I don't like movies just for special effects. I just think that a few movies have spectacular special effects.
but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.
He is to intelEegenT for youre speshal affeks.
last time i checked the ability to spell is a good measure of someone's intelligence. but if you feel that it is i am very sorry for you.
Wait... So, spelling ability is a good measure of someone's intelligence, but if I believe this to be true, then you feel sorry for me? You confuse me, my dear boy.
[This signature saved as part of ancient history, dating back to 2010] <- img courtesy of Zoebear1
strike wolf wrote:
I don't like movies just for special effects. I just think that a few movies have spectacular special effects.
but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.
He is to intelEegenT for youre speshal affeks.
last time i checked the ability to spell is not a good measure of someone's intelligence. but if you feel that it is i am very sorry for you.
Wait... So, spelling ability is a good measure of someone's intelligence, but if I believe this to be true, then you feel sorry for me? You confuse me, my dear boy.
targetman377 wrote:
but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.
He is to intelEegenT for youre speshal affeks.
last time i checked the ability to spell is not a good measure of someone's intelligence. but if you feel that it is i am very sorry for you.
Wait... So, spelling ability is a good measure of someone's intelligence, but if I believe this to be true, then you feel sorry for me? You confuse me, my dear boy.
ERROR 404 - NEW POST NOT FOUND
[This signature saved as part of ancient history, dating back to 2010] <- img courtesy of Zoebear1
I'll come back when I try to understand what the hell Target is saying...and anyways aren't we listening to someone's viewpoints about movies who claimed not to like the Godfather while admitting he had never actually seen the movie?
I also feel compelled to say the following:
Original Star Wars: Great movies
the New Star Wars: Crappy movies with various highlights such as Yoda fighting.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:I was over at the girlfriend's house last night...Before anyone gets excited nothing actually happened which kind of bugs me as I thought she was hinting at having sex and it didn't turn out that way, but no big deal.