Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
bradleybadly
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:53 pm
Location: Yes

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by bradleybadly »

Army of GOD wrote:I hope all Celtics fan aren't this bitchy.
No kidding

But he does have a point about that one particular play when Wallace got fouled out of the game. That was horrible. However, if you look back it's not like Gasol didn't get hammered by Garnett/Davis/Wallace time after time with basically no call. Kobe was also pulled down to the ground earlier (I think it was by Pierce but I can't recall) with not whistle. Bad and good calls tend to even out.

The great thing about this series is that it started in Game #1 and ended in Game #7 with another confrontation between Pierce and Artest. Wouldn't it be great if these two threw down next year against each other. Bring back Laimbeer and Barkley while we're at it!
Lootifer wrote:I earn well above average income for my area, i'm educated and I support left wing politics.
jbrettlip wrote:You live in New Zealand. We will call you when we need to make another Hobbit movie.
User avatar
CreepersWiener
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:22 pm

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by CreepersWiener »

Hey! Way to go Celtics! WOOOHOOO! Way to blow the friggin' lead! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
Army of GOD
Posts: 7192
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by Army of GOD »

Well, if we really want to talk about fixing games...

If the refs weren't getting paid off, the Raptors would've made the playoffs and swept the other team in each round. =D
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
ViperOverLord
Posts: 2489
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: California

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by ViperOverLord »

Army of GOD wrote:Well, if we really want to talk about fixing games...

If the refs weren't getting paid off, the Raptors would've made the playoffs and swept the other team in each round. =D
You truly are not part of reality. The Raptors were not that good with or without Bosh was injured and out for the season/playoffs. And they would have played the Cavs in the first round. The Cavs beat a Bulls team that was better than the Raptors.
High Score: #76 3053
User avatar
ViperOverLord
Posts: 2489
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: California

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by ViperOverLord »

CreepersWiener wrote:Hey! Way to go Celtics! WOOOHOOO! Way to blow the friggin' lead! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Your name matches your character as well as your mental capacity.
High Score: #76 3053
User avatar
ViperOverLord
Posts: 2489
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: California

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by ViperOverLord »

Here's a little something for you. There are no Game 7 highlights on youtube. Within minutes all of the other games had highlights. Here we are almost 48 hours later and there are no Game 7 highlights. Undoubtedly the league preemptively enforced 'copyright infringements claims.' Yet you can see the trophy presentation, Laker highlights only (controversial plays and/or replays excluded). You can see Ron Artest make a fool of himself in his press conference. But you can not watch the highlights of the bad calls and missed calls. The NBA only wants the homers and bandwagoners to be drunk on bliss.

Even if you are a Lakers fan you should be offended by that. But most of you care about a number more than fairness. 16 championships for the Lakers. 5 for Bryant right? You don't have to care about whether its on the level as long as it's accomplished. It's that idiot mentality that has you mobbing your own town after a victory.

'Those Who Would Sacrifice Liberty for Security Deserve Neither' - B Frank.

'Those Who Would Sacrifice Fairness For Glory Deserve Neither' - VOL
Army of GOD
Posts: 7192
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by Army of GOD »

If it really were about the money, then why wouldn't they fix the games so that either Cleavland (with Lebron, obviously) or New York (biggest market in the U.S.) get to the finals?

Please, discontinue spewing your bulls***, Incandenza is becoming fat from the wonderful taste of it and I'm worried about his health.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
CreepersWiener
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:22 pm

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by CreepersWiener »

ViperOverLord wrote:
CreepersWiener wrote:Hey! Way to go Celtics! WOOOHOOO! Way to blow the friggin' lead! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Your name matches your character as well as your mental capacity.
:lol: :lol: :lol: LAKERS WIN! :lol: :lol: :lol: =D>
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
User avatar
ViperOverLord
Posts: 2489
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: California

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by ViperOverLord »

Army of GOD wrote:If it really were about the money, then why wouldn't they fix the games so that either Cleavland (with Lebron, obviously) or New York (biggest market in the U.S.) get to the finals?

Please, discontinue spewing your bulls***, Incandenza is becoming fat from the wonderful taste of it and I'm worried about his health.
You really think its not about the money? Because if it is not then there are some serious irregularities that serve no purpose. Irregularities like waiting to announce refs until game day. And of course the league wanted LBJ vs Kobe. But the league does not always get what they want. They influence to a significant point. The Celtics still almost overcame the worst officiated series in league history but the league got what they wanted this time.

As for NY, well the Knicks suck and if you were a real fan you would not even ask that question.
High Score: #76 3053
User avatar
ViperOverLord
Posts: 2489
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: California

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by ViperOverLord »

ViperOverLord wrote:Here's a little something for you. There are no Game 7 highlights on youtube. Within minutes all of the other games had highlights. Here we are almost 48 hours later and there are no Game 7 highlights. Undoubtedly the league preemptively enforced 'copyright infringements claims.' Yet you can see the trophy presentation, Laker highlights only (controversial plays and/or replays excluded). You can see Ron Artest make a fool of himself in his press conference. But you can not watch the highlights of the bad calls and missed calls. The NBA only wants the homers and bandwagoners to be drunk on bliss.

Even if you are a Lakers fan you should be offended by that. But most of you care about a number more than fairness. 16 championships for the Lakers. 5 for Bryant right? You don't have to care about whether its on the level as long as it's accomplished. It's that idiot mentality that has you mobbing your own town after a victory.

'Those Who Would Sacrifice Liberty for Security Deserve Neither' - B Frank.

'Those Who Would Sacrifice Fairness For Glory Deserve Neither' - VOL
Here's a little something for you. There are no Game 7 highlights on youtube. I guess your ability to overlook that shows your willingness to not keep things on the up and up as long as you get what you want. Tools.
High Score: #76 3053
User avatar
CreepersWiener
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:22 pm

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by CreepersWiener »

ViperOverLord wrote:
ViperOverLord wrote:Here's a little something for you. There are no Game 7 highlights on youtube. Within minutes all of the other games had highlights. Here we are almost 48 hours later and there are no Game 7 highlights. Undoubtedly the league preemptively enforced 'copyright infringements claims.' Yet you can see the trophy presentation, Laker highlights only (controversial plays and/or replays excluded). You can see Ron Artest make a fool of himself in his press conference. But you can not watch the highlights of the bad calls and missed calls. The NBA only wants the homers and bandwagoners to be drunk on bliss.

Even if you are a Lakers fan you should be offended by that. But most of you care about a number more than fairness. 16 championships for the Lakers. 5 for Bryant right? You don't have to care about whether its on the level as long as it's accomplished. It's that idiot mentality that has you mobbing your own town after a victory.

'Those Who Would Sacrifice Liberty for Security Deserve Neither' - B Frank.

'Those Who Would Sacrifice Fairness For Glory Deserve Neither' - VOL
Here's a little something for you. There are no Game 7 highlights on youtube. I guess your ability to overlook that shows your willingness to not keep things on the up and up as long as you get what you want. Tools.
:lol: :lol: :lol: LAKERS WIN, AND VIPERLORD IS SUBJECT TO HAVING TO COME UP WITH EXCUSES OF WHY THE CELTICS BLEW THE LEAD! :lol: :lol: :lol: HE EVEN HAS TO RESORT TO QUOTING HIS OWN POSTS! :lol: :lol: =D> PRICELESS!
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
User avatar
CreepersWiener
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:22 pm

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by CreepersWiener »

ViperOverLord wrote:Who's going to win the 2010 NBA Finals? Why?
rockfist wrote:I would predict the Lakers. For these reasons:

1) Kobe is the best most inspired player in the game now.
2) Gasol is playing better than he was two years ago.
3) The Celtic stars are all getting older.
4) The Lakers have home court.
5) Rondo's back will probably hurt worse in the next few days than it did during the Celtics' last game.
6) Paul Pierce needs to shave.

Rondo's back is the key to the whole series IMO. If he can play inspired ball and isn't hurt badly the Celtics have a good chance. If he isn't 100% I say Lakers in five or six, if he plays well it goes seven.
rockfist WINS! =D> =D> =D>
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
User avatar
ViperOverLord
Posts: 2489
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: California

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by ViperOverLord »

CreepersWiener wrote:
ViperOverLord wrote:
ViperOverLord wrote:Here's a little something for you. There are no Game 7 highlights on youtube. Within minutes all of the other games had highlights. Here we are almost 48 hours later and there are no Game 7 highlights. Undoubtedly the league preemptively enforced 'copyright infringements claims.' Yet you can see the trophy presentation, Laker highlights only (controversial plays and/or replays excluded). You can see Ron Artest make a fool of himself in his press conference. But you can not watch the highlights of the bad calls and missed calls. The NBA only wants the homers and bandwagoners to be drunk on bliss.

Even if you are a Lakers fan you should be offended by that. But most of you care about a number more than fairness. 16 championships for the Lakers. 5 for Bryant right? You don't have to care about whether its on the level as long as it's accomplished. It's that idiot mentality that has you mobbing your own town after a victory.

'Those Who Would Sacrifice Liberty for Security Deserve Neither' - B Frank.

'Those Who Would Sacrifice Fairness For Glory Deserve Neither' - VOL
Here's a little something for you. There are no Game 7 highlights on youtube. I guess your ability to overlook that shows your willingness to not keep things on the up and up as long as you get what you want. Tools.
:lol: :lol: :lol: LAKERS WIN, AND VIPERLORD IS SUBJECT TO HAVING TO COME UP WITH EXCUSES OF WHY THE CELTICS BLEW THE LEAD! :lol: :lol: :lol: HE EVEN HAS TO RESORT TO QUOTING HIS OWN POSTS! :lol: :lol: =D> PRICELESS!
You're a troll. I could care less about your antics. Now go away and let the grown-ups talk.
User avatar
jimboston
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by jimboston »

We lost. (Period)

Bitchin' about bad calls, or injuries, or anything else is just bad sportsmanship.

The C's blew it.

I really don't care too much about the Celtics... but I did want to maintain the legacy, and leave CB with a tarnished rep... but that isn't how it played out.
User avatar
Incandenza
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:34 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Playing Eschaton with a bucket of old tennis balls

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by Incandenza »

ViperOverLord wrote:You're a troll. I could care less about your antics. Now go away and let the grown-ups talk.
Sounds like it's time to call the Whaaaaaambulance. Good thing the Bruins beat the Flyers after taking that 3-0 series lead, the Patriots had that 19-0 season, and the Red Sox beat the Angels in last year's ALDS... oh wait, none of those things happened. Maybe the proverbial chickens are coming home to roost after boston had an almost insane run of good fortune after the last decade.

Unfortunately, though, I've had to stop drinking your sweet sweet tears of despair, since I'm afraid that I'll contract whatever damaged your brain so.
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM

Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
User avatar
the.killing.44
Posts: 4724
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: now tell me what got two gums and knows how to spit rhymes
Contact:

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by the.killing.44 »

Meh, at least the Red Sox are in first.
Army of GOD
Posts: 7192
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by Army of GOD »

Incandenza wrote:
ViperOverLord wrote:You're a troll. I could care less about your antics. Now go away and let the grown-ups talk.
Sounds like it's time to call the Whaaaaaambulance. Good thing the Bruins beat the Flyers after taking that 3-0 series lead, the Patriots had that 19-0 season, and the Red Sox beat the Angels in last year's ALDS... oh wait, none of those things happened. Maybe the proverbial chickens are coming home to roost after boston had an almost insane run of good fortune after the last decade.

Unfortunately, though, I've had to stop drinking your sweet sweet tears of despair, since I'm afraid that I'll contract whatever damaged your brain so.
Woah woah woah woah woah

1. There is NO reason to bring the SAUX into this.
2. The Patriots' failed perfect season was a few years ago.
3. Other than the Lakers, when was the last time an L.A. team won a championship? (MLS doesn't count)
mrswdk is a ho
Army of GOD
Posts: 7192
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by Army of GOD »

the.killing.44 wrote:Meh, at least the Red Sox are in first.
Not really. Still one game back, but tied in wins.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
the.killing.44
Posts: 4724
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: now tell me what got two gums and knows how to spit rhymes
Contact:

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by the.killing.44 »

Army of GOD wrote:
the.killing.44 wrote:Meh, at least the Red Sox are in first.
Not really. Still one game back, but tied in wins.
I hope your first sentence is not for real, or we might have to give Cialis a whirl.

P.S. Both the Yanks and Rays look superior to the Sox thus far…
Army of GOD
Posts: 7192
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by Army of GOD »

Because the SAUX's pitching has been very shaky. Most runs scored though.

Hopefully the pitching staff picks their s*** up.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
the.killing.44
Posts: 4724
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: now tell me what got two gums and knows how to spit rhymes
Contact:

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by the.killing.44 »

Pitching and defense wins games.
Army of GOD
Posts: 7192
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by Army of GOD »

THIS THREAD IS NOW ABOUT THE AL EAST.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
the.killing.44
Posts: 4724
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: now tell me what got two gums and knows how to spit rhymes
Contact:

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by the.killing.44 »

I think we should get ONLY THE BEST MOD EVER JoshyBoy to split these UNNECESSARILY OFF-TOPIC COMMENTS into their own 2010 AL EAST THREAD.

Thanks !
User avatar
Incandenza
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:34 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Playing Eschaton with a bucket of old tennis balls

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by Incandenza »

Army of GOD wrote: Other than the Lakers, when was the last time an L.A. team won a championship? (MLS doesn't count)
So, you mean other than the most successful pro sports franchise of the last 25 years, when was the last time an LA team won the title? How about 2007, when the Ducks won the Stanley Cup? And before you say "the Ducks aren't an LA team!", ask yourself, exactly what city do the Patriots play in? Oh, a suburb of Boston? Hmmmm, I'm pretty confident that Anaheim is a suburb of LA.

Hell, our pro football team won a couple of titles this decade. ;)
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM

Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
Army of GOD
Posts: 7192
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Boston Celtics vs. Los Angeles Lakers

Post by Army of GOD »

Dammit, forgot about the Ducks.

And are we going to pick and choose years to go back when talking about the most successful franchises? They're not even the most successful franchise in their sport overall, while the Yankees and Canadians destroy them in overall championships.
mrswdk is a ho
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”