Moderator: Community Team
tempest-n-a-tcup wrote:I'd be interested in seeing from whence most of your data comes as well.
The classical period of witchhunts in Europe and North America falls into the Early Modern period or about 1480 to 1700, spanning the upheavals of the Reformation and the Thirty Years' War, resulting in an estimated 40,000 to 100,000 executions.[1]
Witch-hunts sponsored by the Roman Catholic Inquisition begin only in the Late Middle Ages. Although it has been proposed that the witch-hunt developed in Europe from the early 14th century, after the Cathars and the Templar Knights were exterminated, and the Inquisition had to turn to persecution of witches to remain active, this hypothesis has been rejected independently by two historians (Cohn 1975; Kieckhefer 1976). They showed that the Inquisition witch hunts originated amongst common people in Switzerland and in Croatia, who pressed the civil courts to support them. Pope John XXII had authorized the Inquisition to prosecute sorcerors in 1320,[10] but inquisitorial courts became systematically involved in witch-hunts only in the 15th century. In the case of the Madonna Oriente, the Inquisition of Milan was not sure what to do with two women who in 1384 and in 1390 confessed to have participated in a type of white magic. In 1484 Pope Innocent VIII issued Summis desiderantes affectibus, a Papal bull authorizing two inquisitors, Kramer and Sprenger, to systemize the persecution of witches.
tempest-n-a-tcup wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote: In fact, immigration is the ONLY reason the Roman Catholic church numbers have not dropped more. The numbers of those brought up Roman Catholic in the US who continue with the church are dropping. (Washington time showed a .59% drop in 2007)
Unless you mean to tell me that an organization is dwindling even though it's outpacing world population growth; I fail to see your point.
tempest-n-a-tcup wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote: Actually, this is not entirely true, either. When those figures are cited, they are based on what people declare themselves to be. A Roman Catholic who has not set foot in church for 20 years is more likely to still label himself as a "Catholic" than most Protestants. (I don't know about other religions in that regard) Also, in many places where Roman Catholicism dominates, there still just aren't other Christian options, not really. You are a Christian, you are Catholic.. pretty much "period". Not so in the US and Europe (and many other places).
You're introducing another standard into the mix? If someone declares themselves to be a Catholic, I'll not dispute them. If you do, then it's between you and them.
tempest-n-a-tcup wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote: You HAD to bring up missionaries, did you. Even in recent times, the Roman Catholic idea of "missionarism" has more to do with replacing culture and "westernizing" societies than spreading Christ's word. There are exceptions (certainly there are wonderul people who are Roman Catholic.. I thought a lot of Mother Teresa, for example) and sometimes a real message gets through in spite of human failings, but the fact is that some of the greatest harm in Christianity was perpetrated through Roman Catholic "missionaries". California has plenty of evidence of that!
What I said was that you do not need a college degree to decide for yourself whether someone is coming to help or to hinder. Johnny Rockets said that Churh growth in the world might have something to do with poor education. I said it could also have to do with people having a favorable opinion of an institution that showed up and tried to help. Both are possible. I made no claim that all missionaries were doing a great job that'd be silly. I doubt you could find any vocation where everybody did a great job.
PLAYER57832 wrote: Unless you mean to tell me that an organization is dwindling even though it's outpacing world population growth; I fail to see your point.
The point is that kids growing up in the church are leaving more than they are staying.
PLAYER57832 wrote:No, its that if you want to brag about your church's success, you have to accept that much of that stated "success" is really not success by the church's own definitions. You want to brag about the moral good the church is doing, but go ahead and count people who throw those morals in the trash.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Actually the growth DOES have to do with poor education. In many areas, the only way to get your child educated is to send them to Roman Catholic Institutions. However, before you start pointing to that as "altruism", you have to look at how and why the Roman Catholic church got there as the sole educational provider.
nietzsche wrote:wait, I easily found a source: Wikipedia. Go ahead and flame wikipedia.
2dimes wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:"Your planet?"
No, but neither you nor I witnessed a person posting that, either. So are you saying THAT did not happen?

tempest-n-a-tcup wrote:Look guys, hey! Go ahead and hate Catholics and the Catholic Church. This stage of the conversation has basically turned into an attempt to overpower through the simple will to keep typing rather than have a dialogue.
Johnny Rockets wrote:tempest-n-a-tcup wrote:Look guys, hey! Go ahead and hate Catholics and the Catholic Church. This stage of the conversation has basically turned into an attempt to overpower through the simple will to keep typing rather than have a dialogue.
I don't hate Catholics. I don't respect those who don't push for reform, or don't acknowledge the wrongs or the need to right them, and prevent future ones.
I think the Catholic Church does good in the world, but has an awsome potential to to much much more if it didn't tie it's hands with ancient dogma.
I think the cardinals are an old boys club, and future popes will be chosen among the outdated thinking clique.
What would be really cool? A thirty year old Pope.
That would shake things up.
Johnny Rockets
2dimes wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:I'm sorry, what was the question?
I don't know, I couldn't crack the code.
BigBallinStalin wrote:2dimes wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:I'm sorry, what was the question?
I don't know, I couldn't crack the code.
I'll stop messing with ya!
When you said "Your Pope?" I heard Keanu Reeves saying "Your planet?" in The Day the Earth Stood Still
2dimes wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:2dimes wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:I'm sorry, what was the question?
I don't know, I couldn't crack the code.
I'll stop messing with ya!
When you said "Your Pope?" I heard Keanu Reeves saying "Your planet?" in The Day the Earth Stood Still
Now I must seek clip on youtube. I don't think I want to sit through and entire "Non Ted Theadore Logan" Keanu movie currently.
I'm still curious how Playa jumped to typing "my pope?" from me suggesting that she could not know the pope was a rapist, unless you were with him all the time to make sure.
2dimes wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:2dimes wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:I'm sorry, what was the question?
I don't know, I couldn't crack the code.
I'll stop messing with ya!
When you said "Your Pope?" I heard Keanu Reeves saying "Your planet?" in The Day the Earth Stood Still
Now I must seek clip on youtube. I don't think I want to sit through and entire "Non Ted Theadore Logan" Keanu movie currently.
I'm still curious how Playa jumped to typing "my pope?" from me suggesting that she could not know the pope was a rapist, unless you were with him all the time to make sure.
tempest-n-a-tcup wrote:Look guys, hey! Go ahead and hate Catholics and the Catholic Church. This stage of the conversation has basically turned into an attempt to overpower through the simple will to keep typing rather than have a dialogue.
2dimes wrote:That might not be as bad as you think, 30 year old tzor might not be all messed up yet.

tzor wrote:(Note: only someone from Key West would ever call Miami "north.")