To see the movie review, CLICK HERE!

Moderator: Community Team

Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
I heard he was good at ice cream.oss spy wrote:I'm picking Napoleon. The man created the largest contiguous land empire in Europe in two decades; he's good at something.
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
I heard he got beat by wellington's beef.CreepersWiener wrote:I heard he was good at ice cream.oss spy wrote:I'm picking Napoleon. The man created the largest contiguous land empire in Europe in two decades; he's good at something.

What original for the Hobbit? the Book or the animated movie? The animated movie was fine yes...as a kid's movie.Funkyterrance wrote:I voted Gandalf, I mean, come on...
But honesty these two movies have something important in common: They're shameless rehashes of brilliant originals. Hollywood has turned to shit imho.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
The book, ffs!strike wolf wrote:What original for the Hobbit? the Book or the animated movie? The animated movie was fine yes...as a kid's movie.Funkyterrance wrote:I voted Gandalf, I mean, come on...
But honesty these two movies have something important in common: They're shameless rehashes of brilliant originals. Hollywood has turned to shit imho.

In that case, Hollywood turning books into movies is about as old as well...Hollywood movies.Funkyterrance wrote:The book, ffs!strike wolf wrote:What original for the Hobbit? the Book or the animated movie? The animated movie was fine yes...as a kid's movie.Funkyterrance wrote:I voted Gandalf, I mean, come on...
But honesty these two movies have something important in common: They're shameless rehashes of brilliant originals. Hollywood has turned to shit imho.![]()
I've seen the animated movie and it's pretty neat in it's own right but it's the extremely abridged version of the book is it not?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Yes, but now it's done in such a "cheap" way that even those people who always wanted to see their favorite books on the big screen are, in their heart of hearts, disappointed. Movies are getting less and less artistic and more and more accessible(in a bad way) to the point where the need to please the demographic overshadows any love that could be put into a film. These remakes/rehashes are way too glitzy and "Hollywood" to have any real depth.strike wolf wrote: In that case, Hollywood turning books into movies is about as old as well...Hollywood movies.
