Viceroy63 wrote:Only a narrow mind, lacking in understanding, could read into existence something that is not really there.
scientists and fantasy authors are narrow-minded. good to know.
Only if Tolkein really believed hobbitses existed - reading into fiction something that isnt really there is what fiction is all about
i guess i forgot to mention all the narrow-minded natural philosophers of antiquity
not to mention all the false things newton, galileo, darwin, and einstein thought were there
you've gotta be more perceptive than this if you're going to make large, sweeping statements like that. it may support your beliefs, but it's still wrong. sorry bro.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Viceroy63 wrote:Only a narrow mind, lacking in understanding, could read into existence something that is not really there.
scientists and fantasy authors are narrow-minded. good to know.
Only if Tolkein really believed hobbitses existed - reading into fiction something that isnt really there is what fiction is all about
i guess i forgot to mention all the narrow-minded natural philosophers of antiquity
not to mention all the false things newton, galileo, darwin, and einstein thought were there
you've gotta be more perceptive than this if you're going to make large, sweeping statements like that. it may support your beliefs, but it's still wrong. sorry bro.
That's a wole different discussion that could be had in a handful of other moderately recent threads without derailing this one with your religous.... oops I mean "totally non-religious honest guv" bullcrap.
john9blue wrote:
i guess i forgot to mention all the narrow-minded natural philosophers of antiquity
not to mention all the false things newton, galileo, darwin, and einstein thought were there
you've gotta be more perceptive than this if you're going to make large, sweeping statements like that. it may support your beliefs, but it's still wrong. sorry bro.
That's a wole different discussion that could be had in a handful of other moderately recent threads without derailing this one with your religous.... oops I mean "totally non-religious honest guv" bullcrap.
there's not really a discussion to be had... your statement was just incorrect.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:
i guess i forgot to mention all the narrow-minded natural philosophers of antiquity
not to mention all the false things newton, galileo, darwin, and einstein thought were there
you've gotta be more perceptive than this if you're going to make large, sweeping statements like that. it may support your beliefs, but it's still wrong. sorry bro.
That's a wole different discussion that could be had in a handful of other moderately recent threads without derailing this one with your religous.... oops I mean "totally non-religious honest guv" bullcrap.
there's not really a discussion to be had... your statement was just incorrect.