flowery elucidations
Moderator: Community Team
Only if Tolkein really believed hobbitses existed - reading into fiction something that isnt really there is what fiction is all aboutjohn9blue wrote:scientists and fantasy authors are narrow-minded. good to know.crispybits wrote:Viceroy63 wrote:Only a narrow mind, lacking in understanding, could read into existence something that is not really there.
i guess i forgot to mention all the narrow-minded natural philosophers of antiquitycrispybits wrote:Only if Tolkein really believed hobbitses existed - reading into fiction something that isnt really there is what fiction is all aboutjohn9blue wrote:scientists and fantasy authors are narrow-minded. good to know.crispybits wrote:Viceroy63 wrote:Only a narrow mind, lacking in understanding, could read into existence something that is not really there.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
That's a wole different discussion that could be had in a handful of other moderately recent threads without derailing this one with your religous.... oops I mean "totally non-religious honest guv" bullcrap.john9blue wrote:i guess i forgot to mention all the narrow-minded natural philosophers of antiquitycrispybits wrote:Only if Tolkein really believed hobbitses existed - reading into fiction something that isnt really there is what fiction is all aboutjohn9blue wrote:scientists and fantasy authors are narrow-minded. good to know.crispybits wrote:Viceroy63 wrote:Only a narrow mind, lacking in understanding, could read into existence something that is not really there.
not to mention all the false things newton, galileo, darwin, and einstein thought were there
you've gotta be more perceptive than this if you're going to make large, sweeping statements like that. it may support your beliefs, but it's still wrong. sorry bro.
there's not really a discussion to be had... your statement was just incorrect.crispybits wrote:That's a wole different discussion that could be had in a handful of other moderately recent threads without derailing this one with your religous.... oops I mean "totally non-religious honest guv" bullcrap.john9blue wrote: i guess i forgot to mention all the narrow-minded natural philosophers of antiquity
not to mention all the false things newton, galileo, darwin, and einstein thought were there
you've gotta be more perceptive than this if you're going to make large, sweeping statements like that. it may support your beliefs, but it's still wrong. sorry bro.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Are you filling in for Woodruff?john9blue wrote:there's not really a discussion to be had... your statement was just incorrect.crispybits wrote:That's a wole different discussion that could be had in a handful of other moderately recent threads without derailing this one with your religous.... oops I mean "totally non-religious honest guv" bullcrap.john9blue wrote: i guess i forgot to mention all the narrow-minded natural philosophers of antiquity
not to mention all the false things newton, galileo, darwin, and einstein thought were there
you've gotta be more perceptive than this if you're going to make large, sweeping statements like that. it may support your beliefs, but it's still wrong. sorry bro.
no, since i'm correct.BigBallinStalin wrote:Are you filling in for Woodruff?john9blue wrote: there's not really a discussion to be had... your statement was just incorrect.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Nice double team on the poor guy who's not even here to defend himself. I'll have to admit it's much easier to defend him when he's not around though.john9blue wrote:no, since i'm correct.BigBallinStalin wrote:Are you filling in for Woodruff?john9blue wrote: there's not really a discussion to be had... your statement was just incorrect.

Funkyterrance wrote:Nice double team on the poor guy who's not even here to defend himself. I'll have to admit it's much easier to defend him when he's not around though.john9blue wrote:no, since i'm correct.BigBallinStalin wrote:Are you filling in for Woodruff?john9blue wrote: there's not really a discussion to be had... your statement was just incorrect.

Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote: We all had tons of men..
Lolz.kentington wrote: Brought to you by Woodruff. I am sure he would have posted it.


Wood you say :Funkyterrance wrote:Lolz.kentington wrote: Brought to you by Woodruff. I am sure he would have posted it.
I'd be lying if I said I didn't miss the big lug.
????thegreekdog wrote: I greatly enjoy any kind of car bomb.
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote: We all had tons of men..
**Munches on a potato**AndyDufresne wrote: On the Bright side, I own half of Ireland.
**Munches on a banana**
--Andy

pancakemix wrote:Quirk, you are a bastard. That is all.
xeno wrote:Why don't y'all cry my a river that you were picked last for kickball and pelted in the face by dodge balls in grammar school
john9blue wrote:i almost never discuss politics or religion
warmonger said:
I done use spell check first of all
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Targetman was the shit, especially in LC. That guy could get on a roll in LC like you wouldn't believe. It was almost magical.jonesthecurl wrote:I miss targetman's "speel check".

BigBallinStalin wrote: the only person here suggesting that you're a fascist is yourself and possibly AndyDufresne.

pancakemix wrote:Quirk, you are a bastard. That is all.
Lil_SlimShady wrote: Semen is relatively vegie-friendly after you take the meat out of your mouth. All those proteins and glucose
Lil_SlimShady wrote: take the meat out of your mouth