Moderator: Community Team
I have a hard time reading anyone as scum right now. I do have a couple town reads, which I previously posted.Endgame422 wrote:I agree 100 percent with your 1st statement streaker.
Your second statement is mostly true as well,although scum may attempt to fakeclaim as roles like tailor are pretty inherently scummy(i would lynch anyone claiming tailor,wouldnt you?)
Also whos you pick for scum streaker?
Zero follow up on his vote, not calling out dazza at all after this, he couldn't care less if dazza actually posted something or not. Obviously trying to look active, not doing anything.benga wrote:I totally misunderstood the draft
The chance that mafia is bottom is likely as it's in the top. Only sure thing is we are kill vanillas going from bottom.
For now I will vote dazza2008 to get something more out of him.
Not really. Saw something that isn't worth adressing after a thorough read. Only thing I'd like to mention is the HUGE overreaction from PTlowe to what little pressure was on him by wing:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Streak you said you were going to follow up on Ptlowe WCG interaction. Anything you want to say about it?
ptlowe wrote:Firstly, I was on my phone when I confirmed. Your "theory" of my being skum is based on me posting twice. Second post was a joke vote would show that I voted sausage because he voted streaker than unvoted streaker. Making a mountain out of a mole hole like someone already pointed out.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I feel bad, I started this with my jokevote.Endgame422 wrote:
Does anyone have an opinion on Ptlowe? Or End's case on Hotshot, or AoG's on Endgame?
Second, I believe your so hard after me because I got such good reads in my last game. This makes me a strong player. Gotta focus on someone when your scum and thats what your doing. Point, point, point and hope someone else gets lynched. Well if I get lynched or killed during day 1 or night 1 my fellow townies you need to lynch Wing day 2 because he is definitely mafia. Yes Im calling you out Wing. My scum meter is higher on Tim. Your defending of Tim is reminiscent of last game where Dakky defended Tim. So I personally think Tim is scum and Im sticking to my guns on this one. Not changing it. His post was very scummy and on top of that it took him a day to respond to mine and dakkys accusation. As before when he was mafia he didnt out right defend himself. Just said he was "busy" with work. Well I work 6 days a week and 12 hours a day and still have the time to make posts.
Posts by person since confirmation....Now I might be off one or two and sorry for that.
Virus 1
Dazz 1
TimWoodbury 6
Madmitch 8
streaker 2
endgame 13
epitaph1 4
dakky21 6
ptlowe 7
AOG 4
Sausage 2
Wing 12
metsfan 7
hotshot 3
benga 2
So let me ask you...we have multiple people with 2 posts or less...We should probably try to ferrit out which ones are keeping there heads down to survive day 1. Look at Dazza for example. One nasty post and thats it.
He also seems to think you are 'hard after him'. Then he also redirects attention to the fact a few players have low vote count/low activity and we should look into that. Not into his scumread (Tim), but the inactives. The entire post that I quoted is crazy and a huge over-defense. Though I would have expected you to pick up on this, wing, as you have him as your main scum candidate.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:He seems to think I am defending Tim, which I'm not.
Is virus your scum read? What about the items brought forth this last page?TimWoodbury wrote:okay so only ones left to actually give something anything at all would be i think virus hes said the least starting to get concerned with him
that was just a before work peak, as im checking in before work. will reread and recheck everything when i get home from work tonightStreaker wrote:Is virus your scum read? What about the items brought forth this last page?TimWoodbury wrote:okay so only ones left to actually give something anything at all would be i think virus hes said the least starting to get concerned with him
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
I'd strongly object to a Virus lynch. Nothing in his opening post suggests scum, and his inactivity isnt abnormal.Streaker wrote:Is virus your scum read? What about the items brought forth this last page?TimWoodbury wrote:okay so only ones left to actually give something anything at all would be i think virus hes said the least starting to get concerned with him
Has anyone played with him before? Some people just get really flustered when they get accused, so it's not necessarily alignment-indicative. But your point is well taken.Streaker wrote:He also seems to think you are 'hard after him'. Then he also redirects attention to the fact a few players have low vote count/low activity and we should look into that. Not into his scumread (Tim), but the inactives. The entire post that I quoted is crazy and a huge over-defense. Though I would have expected you to pick up on this, wing, as you have him as your main scum candidate.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:He seems to think I am defending Tim, which I'm not.
Do you mean that you'd strongly object to a Virus lynch in general, or strongly object based on the currently available evidence? What if we pushed him and some useful information came out of it?WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I'd strongly object to a Virus lynch. Nothing in his opening post suggests scum, and his inactivity isnt abnormal.Streaker wrote:Is virus your scum read? What about the items brought forth this last page?TimWoodbury wrote:okay so only ones left to actually give something anything at all would be i think virus hes said the least starting to get concerned with him
Activity isnt a clear indicator of alignment, it is a tool used by those who are active to deflect the focus onto others. Ptlowe and Tim are the major pushers of this logic.
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
not that it's likely, but I could see a scenario where a claimed role could help...if someone counter claims. Since we know there's just one type of each role, we know one of them is lying. Of course, this could end up as a mislynch and at best we lynch scum and the role is claimed, but at least we got rid of a mafia member.Streaker wrote:Another thing, pushing someone to claim doesn't work this game. What you gonna do with the claimed information? No character names, and power roles completely independent from allignment. If someone claims doc, that means absolutely nothing.
not at all. Like I said previously, role and alignment have NO bearing on each other. A town member could've picked up the Tailor role to make sure scum didn't get it. I don't think that's out of the question.Endgame422 wrote:I agree 100 percent with your 1st statement streaker.
Your second statement is mostly true as well,although scum may attempt to fakeclaim as roles like tailor are pretty inherently scummy(i would lynch anyone claiming tailor,wouldnt you?)
Also whos you pick for scum streaker?
Your analysis and interpretation is like that of a wandering goat. Since your reads and ideas arent sticking on me you start putting me in with Tim and dismissing actual analysis. The more I read of your words the more I think your scum. Trying every which way to find another target to harp on outside of yourself. Your slinging mud to get anything to stick. Your the user of the logic you are pushing saying I am using. Im actually trying to find scum thank you.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I'd strongly object to a Virus lynch. Nothing in his opening post suggests scum, and his inactivity isnt abnormal.Streaker wrote:Is virus your scum read? What about the items brought forth this last page?TimWoodbury wrote:okay so only ones left to actually give something anything at all would be i think virus hes said the least starting to get concerned with him
Activity isnt a clear indicator of alignment, it is a tool used by those who are active to deflect the focus onto others. Ptlowe and Tim are the major pushers of this logic.