What is your reasoning here?Streaker wrote: Most of you consider wing as scummy, I'd say there is 1 scum between Epi and wing. If one of them dies, and flips town, I'd be all over the other one to lynch.
Moderator: Community Team
What is your reasoning here?Streaker wrote: Most of you consider wing as scummy, I'd say there is 1 scum between Epi and wing. If one of them dies, and flips town, I'd be all over the other one to lynch.
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
"has" to be? no.benga wrote:according to draft at least 1 has to be mafia from bottom
so it's either pt, HS, maybe mitch
will still have to rethink my vote on pt, even if I don't like his attitude and even he doesn't say anything on his behalf
HS is just to quiet
Have you forgotten you are on the bottom and why are you giving Dakky a free pass? a lot of people have given you the evil eye and I thought no you are town but maybe you are the scum you are preaching aboutbenga wrote:according to draft at least 1 has to be mafia from bottom
so it's either pt, HS, maybe mitch
will still have to rethink my vote on pt, even if I don't like his attitude and even he doesn't say anything on his behalf
HS is just to quiet
I agree with this, it is possible that the top 5 are all scum or that the bottom 5 are all scum, we have no way of knowing. All that the draft order tells us is relative likelihood of someone having a PR.Epitaph1 wrote:I don't think the draft order has anything to do with alignment. I thought we all just submitted our numbers and the alignments were randomly generated.
This is like a list post only worse. While it is okay that you don't have a strong read on everyone at this point, you should at least provide reasons for your reads, even if you have stated them before. Otherwise you are forcing others to ask you your reasons and that allows you to artificially raise your activity level. Since most Day 1 lynches are policy lynches anyway, it appears you are just trying to skate by. Actually, going back and reading just your posts, I really get a bad feeling about your play so far. Your first five posts all include a vote or fos, while some of these are joke, that is still an awful lot to be changing. You admit that you normally support a no-lynch Day 1, but not this time. You say it is because of 33% odds, I might say it is because you are scum and looking for more deaths and it is a >80% chance that the lynch isn't in your group. I don't think that no lynch is the best choice, but a chance in play is often a red flag for me. You have endgame as scum for a short time because he was trying to get the game moving when we have a ten day day. This, even though shortly after you are placing your vote in a manner so as to "not splinter the vote." To me, this sounds like you wanting to narrow the focus to a couple candidates to make sure one is lynched relatively quickly. I get the feel that your actions and what you are saying really don't match up. You go on to support the idea of lynching all the inactives, because the odds are good that one of them could be scum, you defend this with that for any 5 lynched, one or two should be scum and this is an acceptable ratio because chances are that scum will kill each other off as well. The problem here is that we would mostly be shooting blind, and the active players would mostly be killed off while gaining little info from anything but deaths themselves. This may just be a personal style difference, but most of your posts are quick one or two liners. I'm not asking for novels, but I see posts like this as barely trying to scratch the surface. I get the scummiest vibes from your posts out of everyone's so unvote vote Army of GODArmy of GOD wrote:So far my three biggest scum reads are ptlowe, madmitch and benga.
My biggest town reads are dakky, Epi and Mets
Another fluff post. While I agree with what you say here, this is the simple "I'm making a correct statement which is positive so I'm town" post that I feel a lot of yours are. I will grant that some of my posts have been this, but I have also tried to do much more in my other posts.Army of GOD wrote:"has" to be? no.benga wrote:according to draft at least 1 has to be mafia from bottom
so it's either pt, HS, maybe mitch
will still have to rethink my vote on pt, even if I don't like his attitude and even he doesn't say anything on his behalf
HS is just to quiet
could very well be, yes. But that's a big difference.
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
what? I never said "this is what we should do". I said it's very well possible that scum could kill each other in the night. I never once suggested a no lynch which your post seems to imply.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:AoG seems to think that waiting for mafia to shoot each other is a viable strategy so may well consider lynching him too.
Whatsausage wrote:[This is like a list post only worse. While it is okay that you don't have a strong read on everyone at this point, you should at least provide reasons for your reads, even if you have stated them before. Otherwise you are forcing others to ask you your reasons and that allows you to artificially raise your activity level. Since most Day 1 lynches are policy lynches anyway, it appears you are just trying to skate by. Actually, going back and reading just your posts, I really get a bad feeling about your play so far. Your first five posts all include a vote or fos, while some of these are joke, that is still an awful lot to be changing. You admit that you normally support a no-lynch Day 1, but not this time. You say it is because of 33% odds, I might say it is because you are scum and looking for more deaths and it is a >80% chance that the lynch isn't in your group.Army of GOD wrote:So far my three biggest scum reads are ptlowe, madmitch and benga.
My biggest town reads are dakky, Epi and Mets
I assure you, this is consistent with how I play mafia. I'm not one for long-winded posts. I'm sure someone who's played with me here can attest to that.This may just be a personal style difference, but most of your posts are quick one or two liners. I'm not asking for novels, but I see posts like this as barely trying to scratch the surface.
I strongly disagree. This game has a higher percentage of scum than usual. We have a higher probability of hitting mafia in a random (D1 votes are random...no one is that good at scum reading) lynch in this game than in any other game (where they're usually 3-4 scum for 15 players).Epitaph1 wrote:IMy point about a no lynch scenario is that it's not as fatal to town this game as it is in normal mafia games.
Epitaph1 wrote: 1.Metsfanmax - leaning town; decent input
2.TimWoodbury - leaning town; his actions and claim strike me as a new town player wanting to prove himself. Don't want to pursue him at this point because he'll either be NK'd soon or we'll be able to hold him accountable for his kills.
4.WingCmdrGinkapo - can't tell if he's just trying to mix stuff up or is honestly scum. I don't like how hard he's gone after ptolwe, whom I read as town. I've also had other polar opposite reads (AoG comes to mind), which concerns me as well. However, idk if he'd be making this much noise and potentially attracting attention to himself if he's malicious. He's in the top 5 people, so my guess is that he gets NK'd within the first 2 night if he's town.
5.dazza2008 *Pixar* - no idea. pixar is always impossible to read for me
6.Army of GOD - didn't like his posts for a long time. He's picked up his activity since I started calling him out. I'm not as hot to trot on him as I was at first, but he's still on my short list.
7.Endgame422 - leaning town
8.Whatsausage - no idea. guy seems to come and go. Could use some more posting from him.
9.virus90 - same read as sausage, but he participates even less but it's par for the course for him.
10.Streaker - leaning town - would like to hear more reads from him since people seem to regard him as town
11.HotShot53 neutral to scummy. needs to step it up quite a bit.
12.dakky21 - neutral to leaning town. At first I thought his claim was new guy wanting to prove his role (see Tim) but he's dropped off quite a bit.
13.ptlowe - leaning town. I might be alone in this but he strikes me as classic new player
14.madmitch - neutral - had him leaning town based on claim (see dakky and tim) but now I'm not so sure. playing up his ignorance quite a bit and I think he knows more than he's letting on. He's been in quite a few mafia games recently to all of a sudden not understand that 2 separate mafias can't communicate.
15.benga - kinda scummy. not adding much, not sure if he's consciously doing this or new to the game
I did not mean to imply that you advocate a no-lynch. You have been very vocal in your advocation of a random lynch of inactives. I also will vouch that it is not abnormal for you to advocate random or no-lynches D1.Army of GOD wrote:what? I never said "this is what we should do". I said it's very well possible that scum could kill each other in the night. I never once suggested a no lynch which your post seems to imply.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:AoG seems to think that waiting for mafia to shoot each other is a viable strategy so may well consider lynching him too.
I am giving him free pass with my knowledge of his behaviour, you were the one came out so fast after him saying you are town, that's just nice of covering your ass.madmitch wrote:Have you forgotten you are on the bottom and why are you giving Dakky a free pass? a lot of people have given you the evil eye and I thought no you are town but maybe you are the scum you are preaching aboutbenga wrote:according to draft at least 1 has to be mafia from bottom
so it's either pt, HS, maybe mitch
will still have to rethink my vote on pt, even if I don't like his attitude and even he doesn't say anything on his behalf
HS is just to quiet
So your response to a post that makes the point "it's scummy to throw in correct one-liners to sound townish" is to compliment someone for their post with a one-liner, and then immediately do it again with "don't forget the double-voter?" Somehow I don't get the sense that you really believe it's a high-quality post.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:WhatSausages - Thats a really good quality post.
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
I was the first vote on Endgame and the second vote on you. That's hardly bandwagoning...ptlowe wrote:6.Army of GOD... Doesnt really show strong reads but goes with the bandwagon.