Moderator: Community Team
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
The hell is this? Talk about the lamest, most convenient way to appear townie while also muddling things up severely. We have a list of people we want to lynch. It's compiled by the mod and you get on to it by voting for people. What you're doing is compiling a list of any complaint any player might have against anyone, which doesn't help narrow down the lynch, it helps widen it. The day ends in like 48 hours. What we don't need right now, when it is acknowledged that we don't have much activity left remaining, is to start thinking about acting. We need to actually act.Epitaph1 wrote:Thank you.
Epi - mitch, HS, AoG
ptolwe - AOG, Wing, Sausage, Virus, hotshot
Keep it coming.
And another EPIC fail. Keep bandwagoning like that and you will be the next.madmitch wrote:well that settles that, pretty scummy Epic VOTE EPIC
Metsfanmax wrote:The hell is this? Talk about the lamest, most convenient way to appear townie while also muddling things up severely. We have a list of people we want to lynch. It's compiled by the mod and you get on to it by voting for people. What you're doing is compiling a list of any complaint any player might have against anyone, which doesn't help narrow down the lynch, it helps widen it. The day ends in like 48 hours. What we don't need right now, when it is acknowledged that we don't have much activity left remaining, is to start thinking about acting. We need to actually act.Epitaph1 wrote:Thank you.
Epi - mitch, HS, AoG
ptolwe - AOG, Wing, Sausage, Virus, hotshot
Keep it coming.
unvote
vote Epi

StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
Seriously. How mitch only has two votes right now is beyond me.dakky21 wrote:And another EPIC fail. Keep bandwagoning like that and you will be the next.madmitch wrote:well that settles that, pretty scummy Epic VOTE EPIC
I will keep my vote on you, I'm not voting epi for writing a sarcastic post.
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM? I am not bandwagoning and you know it , I made two votes in this game and they were both reasonable so quit trying to stir the pot,if you can;t vote for me in the first post you find someway to do it,so back offdakky21 wrote:And another EPIC fail. Keep bandwagoning like that and you will be the next.madmitch wrote:well that settles that, pretty scummy Epic VOTE EPIC
I will keep my vote on you, I'm not voting epi for writing a sarcastic post.
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
madmitch wrote:@ Dakky, I looked up your home town on google earth, looks nice,do live in the main city or the outskirts. what;s the deal about the tree and the rock? looks neat.
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
just wanted to get to know my adversary,no big deal,oh by the way I see on your profile one of your interests is fake claimingEpitaph1 wrote:madmitch wrote:@ Dakky, I looked up your home town on google earth, looks nice,do live in the main city or the outskirts. what;s the deal about the tree and the rock? looks neat.![]()
Not sure where you're going with this. . .
This is not going to do anything. Has it gotten us anywhere so far? Do you think it will save us in the next 48 hours? The problem is one you've already acknowledged: we all have suspicions of a number of players. There isn't going to be one single player who everyone is mostly suspicious of, to a significantly greater extent than everyone else. If that were true then that person would already be leading the vote count.Epitaph1 wrote:
So, what I've started doing is gathering a list of everyone's suspects. If a bunch of us keep listing a certain player or players, then we know who we should focus our attention in what little time we have.
Yes I know, we're all idiots for not instantly agreeing with this analysis. Please forgive us for being so slow.Seriously. How mitch only has two votes right now is beyond me.
Page 15Epitaph1 wrote: Who is everyone willing to lynch?
Page 16WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote: I would lynch any of, Epi, PT, Pix, Hotshot, or Benga.
Epitaph1 wrote: Wing, state it clearly on the record whom you would like to lynch right now.
Don't get too upset about it. It seems to have been established that a suspicion is not formal until you directly say it to Epi and Epi alone. That's why there is no list for Sausage and virus despite ptlowe clearly saying on page 15 that he would vote for them.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Page 14
Page 15Epitaph1 wrote: Who is everyone willing to lynch?
Page 16WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote: I would lynch any of, Epi, PT, Pix, Hotshot, or Benga.
Epitaph1 wrote: Wing, state it clearly on the record whom you would like to lynch right now.
I just proposed my idea 3.5 hours ago. . .Metsfanmax wrote: This is not going to do anything. Has it gotten us anywhere so far?
That's what I'm trying to figure out. I'd bet there are two or three people that a lot of us are willing to vote but we just need to get organized.Metsfanmax wrote:There isn't going to be one single player who everyone is mostly suspicious of, to a significantly greater extent than everyone else. If that were true then that person would already be leading the vote count.
I'm just asking people to simply and clearly list who they are willing to vote for. This isn't bias, this is a straightforward question that will hopefully lead to a clear list. I'm not ignoring everyone's comments from the past 15 pages. I'm not asking for reads. I'm asking: who would you vote for. For example, I think Wing is scummy but I'm not willing to lynch him on D1. I've explained why multiple times.Metsfanmax wrote: More importantly, this list is ripe for bias. You've only started collecting this information on the last page when there's plenty of information on who suspects who buried in the last 15 pages. Why are you ignoring all that? Does my suspicion of a player only count if it is on the Epitaph1-approved list? I mean, I voted for you and you didn't even add me to the list of people who are suspicious of you. So I have no idea what you're trying to do except spread confusion.
Didn't call you guys idiots. I'm just surprised that mitch has so few votes based on how he's played.Metsfanmax wrote: Yes I know, we're all idiots for not instantly agreeing with this analysis. Please forgive us for being so slow.
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
You've already established that this isn't about who is the scummiest, it is about who we can get 8 votes for. So you can't really complain.Epitaph1 wrote:Wing, do you really think I'm the scummiest person?
well saidMetsfanmax wrote:You've already established that this isn't about who is the scummiest, it is about who we can get 8 votes for. So you can't really complain.Epitaph1 wrote:Wing, do you really think I'm the scummiest person?
I'd like to hear him answer that.Metsfanmax wrote:You've already established that this isn't about who is the scummiest, it is about who we can get 8 votes for. So you can't really complain.Epitaph1 wrote:Wing, do you really think I'm the scummiest person?
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
He has not yet replied to my prod. I am giving him until tomorrow morning - if there is no reply, I will be replacing him, and giving an extension.ptlowe wrote: 9.virus90 (8,9) Should be kicked for inactivity