my last post was saying that Hjelp was pushing too hard about sonic's soft claim. ostensibly, that puts me on sonic's side at that point. but re-thinking that idea based on a few things.
ragian's long, detailed post. sonic's response to that screams of "i can't argue the content so i'll attack the delivery"
sonic's explanation of his soft claim.:
i don't see how a soft claim can get townies to trust you but confuse scum. if you're vague enough, both sides are unsure. if you give enough detail to get the town's trust, you've also given enough detail to get scum attention.SoN!c wrote: Sun Mar 01, 2026 6:29 am Soft-claiming means hinting at your role without explicitly stating it.
When your soft claiming you’re trying to give enough information that town players can pick up on it and maybe trust you, but scum can’t be 100% sure what you are either.
It can also bait scum into mistakes / scum might react nervously to this (hinting at more info).
*****
on another topic that has come up. i've already stated my opinion that i would only vote for a D1 lynch if someone is clearly suspicious. so by corollary, i don't see any benefit to lynching an inactive. admittedly, i'm working under the assumption here that they aren't deliberately avoiding the game to hide their role. i'm assuming they're inactive due to real life things keeping them away. and that can affect townie as easily as it affects scum. so it would be a lynch that's based on literally zero information about the game and their role.



