All wrong: Michangelo was painting a scene of the Last Judgement, a vision or view of Teachings of Religious significance, of something to invoke FEAR in those gazing on the painting, in an attempt to keep them "in line" via fear of eternal damnation, with fierce creatures of an active imagination and an artistic creativity. Exactly what were the inspirations for his visions and ideas? Who knows. I doubt that he actually sawConfederateSS wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 11:15 pm --------------------[size=20 I ALSO SAID.....MICHELANGELO.....PAINTED WHAT HE SAW.....CREATURES WHO WATCH FROM THE WOODS.......I NEVER SAID HE CALLED THEM BIGFOOT....THAT'S WHAT WE CALL THEM.......HE THOUGHT OF THEM AS NEIGHBORS(people/hairy people) WHO LIVE IN THE WOODS.....I SAID/WROTE THAT AS WELL...Along with others throughout HISTORY....Painted/wrote...ABOUT REAL LIVE BIGFOOTS....IN THEIR TIME....HISTORICAL FACTS....[/size]...ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion)...
![]()
that were indeed NOT what we may call Bigfoot creatures. They were NOT large or HUGE creatures.NEIGHBORS(people/hairy people) WHO LIVE IN THE WOODS
There may have been poor people who lived desperate lives in the Woods who were unkempt (hairy, no haircut or baths) and desperate for food and "creature comforts" of a bed and house and such. Be REAL, they are SIMPLY NOT Bigfoot.
And just because an image in a painting is LARGE does not mean that that is indeed a Bigfoot creature or a giant or any other such mythical creature.
And despite what ConfedSS inteprets that Duk supported his CRAZY ideas, here is what Duk actually said, and Duk casts doubt on the entire idea of a Bigfoot or Sasquatch in this painting.
I'm not techie enough to zoom in, but from what I can read online, it seems the creatures in the cave behind Christ have been called sasquatches by some commentators. Others say they are demons waiting and hoping to take souls to Hell if Christ fails to redeem them. Given the religious nature of the painting, I think the latter explanation is more likely.
means your ideas are NOT credible in Duk's mind, ConfedSS.latter explanation is more likely
Look and read again what Duk said. Or simply ask Duk.
And, NO SURPRISE: ConfedSs is talking gibberish
He painted Bigfoot, but did not call them Bigfoot. AND he wrote about them...?? REALLY? But they were NOT Bigfoot...or were they....???Painted/wrote...ABOUT REAL LIVE BIGFOOTS....IN THEIR TIME....HISTORICAL FACTS....
The incohence I keep reading from ConfedSs is almost scrambling my brain. I need to stop reading this incohent crazy gibberish, before he confuses me any more.



